HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCMinutes_2009_02_24 301
Brookings City Council
February 24,2009
The Brookings City Council held a meeting on Tuesday,February 24, 2009 at 5:00 p.m., at City Hall
with the following membexs present: Mayor Scott Munsterman, Council Members Julie Whaley,
Ryan Brunner,Tim Reed,Mike McClemans,Mike Bartley and Tom Bezdichek. City Manager Jeff
Weldon, City Attorney Steve Britzman, and City Clexk Shari Thornes wexe also present.
Storm Drainage Plan U�dates. City Engineer Jackie Lanning and Assistant City Engineer Thad
Drietz reviewed and discussed the Pxoject Prioritization Procedure and presented the Preliminary
Prioritization Results. 'I'he Prioritization Process Development defines the problem aseas,
deterinines potential solutions, estimates the costs, categorizes the criteria to be used when assessing
the pros and cons o£each project, determines a `weight'that each category will carzy, scores each
project on a scale of 0 to 5 in each of the categories,multiplies the individual scores by the weight of
each category, totals the scores for each project, and ranks the projects by the total score.
Eight ranking criteria categories wexe presented at the last presentation. After public discussion, one
new category was added and one category was split into two. The 10 Project Ranking Categories
include: potential environmental impact,number of buildings affected, occupant evacuation,
property damage (new),traffic impacts,location in basin, cost versus budget,reduced ma.intenance
issues,infrastructure age/condition and citizen safety. The method of ranking the ranking
categories includes a review if the category poses an immediate threat to life and safety, the extent of
the threat and if the threat is irrunediate.
The criteria scoring system assigns scores of 0 to 5 in each category for each pxoject's goal. A score
of zero (0) typically means the project's goal has no impact on that category. A zero is also assigned
when the project does not provide a benefit in that particular category. A score of five (5) means
the project's goal is most consistent with the category definition or key points of the category.
Weight is a factor assigned to a category from 0.1 to 1.0 or greater. It is related to life and safety and
is independent of the project. Each category's weight is the same for all projects. Score is a number
assigned to a project from a 0 to 5 scale. It is related to the project's goal and its applicability to the
category being scored. A score is assigned in each category for each project. Each project will have
10 scores because there are 10 categories. Weight is based on safety. Score is based on applicability
of the project's goal.
In reviewing the category of potential envi.tonmental impact the weight considerations have no
unmediate effects on life and safety but could have long-term effects. The recommendation is 0.4.
Scoring considerations consider the potential environmental impact of the project. No change
would receive the highest score. Improvement may also score fairly high. The highest potential for
environmental impact would receive the lowest score.
The weight considerations for buildings affected include minimal flash flood effects in Bxookings.
Threat is generally predictable during a flood. Mid to long term effects on building safety. The
recommendation is 0.7. The scoring considerations include the number of buildings potentially in
contact with flood waters. A score of zero (0)would be assigned to projects that do not change the
number of buildings affected.
The weighting considerations for occupant evacuation include predictability of the need for
evacuations (night vs. day). Evacuateon is a response to an immediate threat. The recommendation
is 0.9. Scoring considerations include the number of occupants that would requi.te evacuation and
evacuation logistics (accessibility and population density).
The weighting considerations for property damage include no unmediate threat to life and safety and
potential health effects due to water damage. The recommendation is 0.5. The scoring
considerations include personal property and valuables,parked vehicles,property value and potential
lost revenue.
The weighting considerations for traffic impact include no uxunediate threat to life and safety. The
danger is typically observable and avoidable. Flooded streets can hamper emergency response
efforts. The recommendation is 0.7. Scoring considerations include if alternate routes are available
and if the flooded street isolates people.
� o �
The weighting considerations for location in basin include incorrect sequencing can create new
safety hazards either upstream or downstream of the project. The recommendation is 0.9. Scoring
considerations include detention projects should be constructed before increasing downstream flow
capacity (upstream fitst);projects which increase flow capacity should begin at the downstream end;
detention projects towards the populous center of the city will benefit more residents.
Cost vs. budget is a one-dimensional criterion (no safety issue). Since money is the driving force for
the whole prioritization process, category weight is high. The recommendation is 1.0. Scoring
considerations include the city should strive to accomplish as much as possible within a given
budget. Inexpensive projects with lower priority could be moved up in the prioritization list.
Lowest scores are assigned to projects with the highest costs. Highest scores axe assigned to
projects with the lowest scores. Project construction that can be `phased'will score higher. Each
construction phase must provide a standalone benefit.
The weighting considerations for reduced maintenance issues include no irnmediate threat to life and
safety and unmaintained features can create a hazard. The recommendation is 0.4. The scoring
considerations review if the project reduces the maintenance that is presently required. A score of
zero (0) means no change.
The weighting considerations for infrastructute age include aging drainage structures could have
failute potential,but not likely to cause an immediate threat to life and safety. The recommendation
is 0.5. The scoring considerations review only the structures that would be replaced by the project,
the structure's remaining useful life and if there is imminent danger of structural failure.
Citizen safety direcdy deals with life and safety of pedestrians,bystanders, etc. The recommendation
is 1.2. Scoring considerations include how quickly the threat develops,if there is ample warning for
citizens to avoid the threat and if the project actually reduces the threat potential.
Future re-evaluation of project xankings include: some projects can dramatically change the city's
hydrology, some projects can affect other projects either upstream or downstream,new storm
management techniques and technologies are always being developed. For these reasons, the
project prioritization list will tend to shuffle when re-evaluation takes places. The list should be re-
evaluated on an annual basis.
Detention projects construction before downstream flow capacity... problem area too much flow
downstteam and didn't do detention and just upsized. Other end would receive same amount of
water but at a high rate. Like a regulator.
i cu.r 'o : Sta.ff requested Council consensus on the weighting and guidelines portion of process.
ACTION: A motion was made by Reed,seconded by Whaley,to adopt the drainage project
prioritization spreadsheet. Corrections were noted in the packet: Buildings rated at 0.70,property
damage at 0.50 and occupants at 0.90. Discus.rion: There wa.r Council and cititien di.rcu.r.rion regarding
buidding categorie.r verre.r occupant.r a�'ected arrd the weighting factor.r. On the motion, all present voted yes;
motion carried. The presentation and results will be posted on the city website on February 25`�.
BATA Relocation. City Manager Weldon reported that the City was approached by Brenda
Schweitzer,Executive Director of the Brookings Area Transit Authority (BATA),about the
possibiliry of re-locating their facility to a clifferent location that would provide a larger facility. They
currendy have no room to grow and need a larger bus garage facilities.
Having looked for available land around the community and previous work session discussion with
City Council,BATA would like to discuss with the City Council using some of the city property
north of the Larson Ice Arena campgxound hookups or a corner parcel in the Telkamp Industrial
Park. Weldon said the pwrpose of having this agenda was to assess the Council's level of interest in
this project, and give staff direction if you wish to pursue the idea.
The Council evaluated the merits of the proposed locations asking Schweitzer for input on specifics
as to logistics,access to the interstate, funding,park&ride options,size requirements,shuttle
optio,ns,proximity to other ameriities,infrasttucture needs,coardination with SDSU's needs, other
location options in addition to those listed above,possible land swap options, and BATA's long
term expansion needs.
The final discussion related to timing in that BATA would need commitments very soon to meet the
funding deadlines.
303
The Council directed the City Manager to check into other land oprions in the Telkamp Industrial
Addition including initiating discussion with the 4H organization xegarding the riding arena area and
to review options at the Maxch 10`h meeting.
6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL MEETING
�onsent Agenda: A motion was made by Bardey, seconded by Reed, to appxove the agenda with
the above amendments,which included:
A. Action to approve the agenda.
B. Bids. Action to award bids for Fire Department Equipment for 15 -USAR Jacket PBO
(millennia) No thermal liner"SR" crosstech moisture barriet as pex Dept. Specs., 15 -USAR
Pants PBO (millennia) No thermal linex"SR" crosstech moisture barrier as per Dept. Specs,
and 15 -Technical Rescue/light-weight USAR, Full Brim w/4-point suspension to M&T
Fite&Safety,Volga, SD for$24,714.00. No other bids wexe received.
C. Bids. Action to award bid for 6F1 Command Vehicle,2009 3/<Ton 4x4 Truck,to Einspahr
Auto Plaza Inc,Brookings, for$33,390. No other bids were received.
D. Action to renew a joint City/School Facility A.greement.
Agreement for Intergovernmental Cooperation
Pertaining to the Joint Use of Buildings and Facilities
This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Brookings, a municipal
corporation,hereafter referred to as "City", and Brookings School District 5-1,hereafter
referred to as "School".
WHEREAS, each of the parties own and maintain certain buildings and facilities which
could be utilized by the other for purposes of executing theit xespective mission and public
service objectives. Further, the parties recognize it is in the best interest of the public and to
taxpayers to avoid duplication,maXimi7e utilization, and ninimi7e costs so facilities can be
shared;and that operations and costs are to be managed to provide the greatest possible
benefit to both parties and the general public,
NOW THEREFORE,in order to accomplish the objectives set forth above, the paxties
hereto agree to the following:
1. Designated Re�resenta,tives.The Director of Parks, Recreation,and Forestrq shall
represent the Ciry and the Activities Director shall represent the School in developing
changes,updates,modifications as deemed necessary to this agreement. The Directox of
Parks, Recxeation and Forestry shall report such changes to the City Manager and the
Activities Director shall report such changes to the School Superintendent who shall
subsequendy meet if necessary to address any changes,updates, or modifications.
Changes to this agteement shall be approved by the governing body of each governing
unit.
2. Descri�tion of facility and�arty res�onsibilities
• FACILITY DEVELOPMENT: The City and School share the same philosophy of
joint school/park facilities. In the past, ciry parks/schools,and joint facilities have
been planned to accommodate both parties. To the extent possible this practice will
continue in the future. 'This process maximi�es use of both outdoor and indoor
facilities for the use of students as well as members of the community.
� FACILITY MAINTENANCE: The Ciry and School shall cooperate in
maintenance, scheduling,and usage of both indoor and outdoor facilities. These
responsibilities will be defined further through an Operational Addendum to this
agreement itemizing arrangements for each school/park facility, developed by the
Directox of Parks,Recreation& Forestry and the Activities Director. This
agreement may provide for the transfer of funds for services provided or in kind
payments in lieu of services provided as noted on the opexational addendum.
• ANNUAL REVIEW AND MODIFICATIONS: School and City staff shall meet
annually to review the past year's operation and discuss any changes that should be
made to the Operational Addendum. Specific modifications to use, scheduling, and
maintenance of each facility are considered managerial purview and would not
require approval of the governing bodies,but would be subject to approval bq the
City Manager and School Superintendent. Said modifications must maintain the
joint use guidelines and philosophy of this agreement.
3. Indemnification. The City and School agree that each shall defend,indemrufy and save the
other, and theix officers and employees harmless against all liabilities, losses, damages, and
expenses which any or all of them may hereafter incur or pay out as a result of the
� o �
negligent acts or omissions of the indemnifying party. Accordingly, the City shall defend,
indemnify and save the School, its officers and employees harrnless against all liabilities,
losses, damages, and expenses which the School may hereafter incut or pay out as a result
of negligent acts or omissions of the City in performing this Agreement, and the School
shall defend, indemnify and save the City, its officers and employees harmless against all
liabilities,losses, damages, and e�enses which the City may hereafter incur or pay out as a
xesult of negligent acts or omissions of the School in performing this Agreement.
4. Mutual coo�eration and further agreements The City and School agree to cooperate in
good faith with regard to each and every aspect of this agteement.The City and School
further agree to negotiate in good faith and to enter such other and further agreements
as may be necessary to implement any aspect of this agxeement.Any revisions to this
agreement must be in writing and any further agreements between the parties must also
be in writing and approved by the goveming boards of each entity.
5. This agreement can be terminated by either parties but xequire a one yeax written notice.
E. Action to approve Restaurant Liquor Operating Agreement format. .
Liquor Operating Agreement for Restaurant Establishments
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the CITY OF BROOKINGS,
a municipal corporation of the State of South Dakota,hereinafter referred to as the "Ciry"
and . (dba�, , owner, hereinafter referred to
as the "Manager".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,the City has been issued an on-sale alcoholic beverage license and is engaged in
the sale of alcoholic beverages,and
WHEREAS,the City desires to enter into an operating agreement on a limited basis with the
Manager for the purpose of operating an on-sale establishment or business for and on behalf
of the City pursuant to law,and
WHERF.AS, the Manager has offered to have facilities in which to operate said on-sale
establishment solely upon the premises hereinafter described.
NOW,THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
I. This Agreement is made and entexed into on a limited basis between the paxties hereto to
allow the Manager to operate a xetail on-sale premises,pursuant to and in accoxdance with all
of the terms and conditions of this Agreement in accordance with all State laws and City
Otdinances now in effect and as may be enacted in the future.
II. The Manager shall be individually responsible for all operating expenses of said on-sale
establishment,including but not limited to utilities, taxes,insurance and license fees,if any.
The Manager shall furnish all equipment and fixtures necessary to operate the establishment.
III. The on-sale establishment shall be located upon real estate in the City of Brookings,
South Dakota, described as: (LEGAL DESCRIPTIOl�, City of Brookings,Brookings
County,South Dakota
N. The Manager shall dispense only alcoholic beverages supplied by the Municipal off-sale
establishment.
V.This Agxeement shall be in full force and effect for a pexiod of five (5)years with the
Manager having the option and privilege of a five (5)year extension,subject to the appxoval of
the governing body of the Ciry of Bxookings.
VI. Either the Manager or the City may terminate this Agreement without cause upon ninety
(90) days written notice served by either party upon the other. The City reserves the right to
immediately suspend or revoke this Agreement without ninety (90) days written notice for
alcohol related violations in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 25-88 or any
amendments thereto or for any late payments for alcoholic beverages supplied by the
Municipal off-sale establishment to be sold on the premises of Managex.
30 �
VII. The Manager shall receive as full compensation for its services rendered, the net profit
from the on-sale establishment under its management,and the sole profit to be derived by the
City shall be the markup hereinafter set forth on alcoholic beverages fiitnished by the
mutucipality to the Managex for the purposes of resale on the premises as above described.
VIII. The Manager shall pay to the City for all alcoholic beverages sold by the Ciry to the
Manager for resale on the above-described premises, the actual cost of distilled spirits and wine
supplied by the City,plus eleven percent (11%)in excess of such cost;the Manager shall pay to
the City for all malt beverages sold by the City to the Manager for resale on the above-
described premises,the actual cost of malt beverages,plus ten percent(10%) in e.�ccess of such
cost. The actual cost shall include cost price and transportation charges. The markup
percentages provided in this Agreement are subject to change by the City of Brookings. In the
event markup petcentages are changed by Oxdinance,then the markup percentages provided
by City Ordinance shall supercede the markup percentages provided herein. The Manager
further agrees that if either of the markup percentages shall be incxeased at any time by the
City,the Manager shall pay the markup as so increased.
IX. A complete and detailed record shall be maintained by the City of all alcoholic bevexages
supplied to the on-sale Manager and such alcoholic beverages so supplied shall be evidenced
by prenumbered invoices ptepared in triplicate showing the date,quantity,brand,size and
actual cost of such item,and such invoice shall bear the signatute of the authorized
representa.tive of the on-sale Manager or its authorized representative. One copy thereof shall
be retained by the Municipal off-sale establishment, one copy shall be retained by the on-sale
establishment,and one copy shall be filed with the City Clerk. All copies shall be kept as
permanent recoxds and made availa.ble for reference and audit purposes. The Manager also
agrees to maintain a complete record of all alcoholic beverages received from the City.
X. In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained,the Manager agtees to
pay the CITY OF BROOKINGS, One Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars
($1,500.00), constituting the Annual License Fee on or by January 1, .and on or by
the first day of each year thereafter as long as this agreement shall remain in force and effect
The Manager further agrees that if the annual fee shall be increased at any time by the
legislature,the Managex shall pay the amount of any such increase. In addition, the Managex
agrees to pay the federal stamp fee.
XI.The Manager agrees to keep the premises in a neat,clean and attractive appearance,and
Managex futther agrees to operate said on-sale establishment only on such days and at such
hours as permitted by state law and city ordinances.
XII. The Manager shall have the right to return,at any time,alcoholic beverages received
fxom the City and to receive in xetum any deposit made fox such alcoholic beverages;in the
event of termination of the business,all unused alcoholic beverages,which may be resold
without discount may be returned to the City and the Manager shall be reimbursed for the
cost of such alcoholic beverages.
XIII.The Manager agrees to abide by the credit policies of the City and acknowledges,by
execution of this Agreement,xeceipt of a copy of the credit policies of the City. The City
reserves the right to change or terminate its credit policies at any time,but shall be required to
provide written notice to Manager prior to the effective date of the change or termulation date
o£the credit policies.
XN. The Manager agrees to furnish the City upon demand,evidence of payment of the
following:
A. All salaxies of on-sale employees;
B. Social Security and withholding taxes on said employees;
C. Worker's Compensation insurance premiums covering said employees;
D. Unemployment ta�ces on the payrolls of said employees;
E. General liability insurance protecting both the City and Managex against claims for
injuty or damages to persons ox property, said policy to have generallia.bility limits
of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) single limit, and One
Million—Dollaxs ($1,000,000.00) aggregate, and a limitation of Fifty Thousand
Dollass ($50,000.00) for dama.ge to property. The genexal liability insurance limits
are subject to change and Manager agrees to change limits of insurance if required
by the City;
� o �
F. Rent and utility bills;
G. Any and all miscellaneous expenses,including taxes.
XV. The Manager agrees to observe all Federal and State laws and all ordinances of the City
of Brookings.
XVI. The City covenants and agrees to furnish the on-sale license to Manager pursuant to the
tertns and conditions of this Operating Agreement and the terms and conditions of the on-sale
license.
XVII. The City shall have the right to make inspections and investigations of the premises
during the hours of opexation,and make audits and examinations of the records of the
Manager relating to the on-sale establishment.
XVIII. The City shall have the right to require,and the Manager the obligation to provide,
applicable financial information as a means of auditing compliance with state and applicable
laws,in a format determined by the City,with 30 days written notice.
XIX. It is further specifically understood and agreed that the waiver of the rights of the City
under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuous waiver,and anp viola.tion ot breach of
the terms of this agreement by the Managex shall constitute a sepaxate and distinct offense and
grounds fox immediate termination and revocation of this Agreement
XX. This agreement shall not be assignable to anothex person or location without the written
consent of the Ciry.
F. Action on Resolution No. 13-09, a Resolution Establishing a Fee For Tax Inctement
Financing Applications.
Resolution No. 13-09
A Resolution Establishing a Fee for Tax Increment
Financing Applications
WHEREAS,the City of Brookings has adopted policies and procedures for pxocessing
applications fox Tax Incxement Finance assistance fxom the City,and
WHEREAS,the xeview, analysis,and administration of such applications can be expected to
consume City resources,and
WHEREAS,the expense of such resources are considered a special benefit exclusively to the
applicant and not a general benefit to the overall community, and
WFiEREAS, such special benefit expenses should be financed by the specific party receiving
said benefit from the services constituting a fee for service,and
WHERF.AS, such fee should be in an amount designed to cover the costs associated with
providing the service.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Ciry of Brookings establish a non-
refundable application fee of$1000 fox a full Tax Increment Finance application.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said fee shall cover only the in-house costs of the City
and applicant shall also pay costs associated with the City's legal and financial analysis of the
application that may be incurred beyond this initial application fee.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED there shall be no fee associated with the pre-application,
the fee must be paid at the time the full application is delivered to the City,and payment of
the fee shall not constitute approval of the application.
G. Action on Resolution No. 14-09,A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order
(CCO#1 Final) for 2008-01SWR, Sidewalk and Curb & Gutter Repair Project.
Resolution No. 14-09
A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order (CCO#1 Fina1) For
2008-01SWR Sidewalk and Cutb &Gutter Project Consolidated Readq-Mix,Inc.
307
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the following change o�dex be allowed for
2008-01SWR Sidewalk and Curb &Gutter Project: Construction Change Oxder Number 1
Final. Adjust estimated bid quantities to "as build" quantities for a total increase of
$2,286.45.
H. Action on Resolution No. 15-09,A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order
(CCO#1 Final) for 2008-06STI, Chip Seal Project.
Resolution No. 15-09
A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order (CCO#1 Final) For
2008-06STI Chip Seai Project Topkote, Inc.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the following change ordex be allowed for
2008-06STI Chip Seal Project: Construction Change Order Nutnbex 1 Final. Adjust
estimated bid quantities to "as build" quantities for a total increase of$16,377.90.
I. Action on Resolution No. 16-09,A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order
(CCO#1 Final) for 2008-08STI, Street Maintenance & Overlay Project.
Resolution No. 16-09
A Resolution Authorizing Fina1 Change Order (CCO#1 Final) For
2008-08STI Street Maintenance&Overlay Project
Bowes Construction Company, Inc.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the following change order be allowed for
2008-08STI Street Maintenance & Overla,y Project: Construction Change Order Number 1
Final. Adjust estimated bid quantities to "as build" quantities foz a total increase of
$4,285.47.
J. Action on Resolution No. 17-09,A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Order
(CCO#1 Final) for 2008-123, Seiler Addition Subdivision Utilities & Grading Project.
Resolution No. 17-09
A Resolution Authorizing Final Change Oxder (CCO#1 Final) For
2008-123 Seiler Addition Subdivision Utilities &Grading Project
Schedule B: VJ Ahlers Excavating, Inc.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the following change order be allowed fox
2008-123 Seiler Addition Subdivision Utilities &Grading Project: Construction Change
Order Number 1 Final. Adjust estimated bid quantities to "as build" quantities for a total
decrease of$288.36.
K. Action on Resolution No. 18-09, Resolution for Federal Aid Surface Transportation
Program, P3234(50) PCN OORL,34th Avenue from US 14 to Prince Drive.
Resolution No. 18-09
A Resolution For Federal Aid Surface Transportation Program
P3234(50) PCN OORL
34th Avenue from US 14 to Prince Drive,Brookings,SD
WHEREAS, the Brookings City Council desires the 2010 consttuction improvement of the
road as hereinafter described:
LOCATION AND LENGTH: 34`�Avenue from US 14 to Prince Drive (0.70 mile)
Estimated cost: $1,250,000.00.
TYI'E OF CONSTRUCTION: Grading,gravel, cuxb &gutter,storm sewer,asphalt paving
base bid with concrete pavement alternate bid, and pavement markings.
AND WHEREAS, the City of Brookings is obligated and hereby agrees to provide proper
maintenance as required by the Federal Highway Act as amended and supplemented thexeto
for the project after construction is completed and to regulate ox cause to be regulated the
installation of utility facilities within the limits of the right-of-way of the proposed project in
accordance with State and Federal requirements.
AND WHEREAS,the City of Brookings is obligated and hereby agrees to reimburse the
State for all costs not re.imbursable with Surface Transportation Program (STP) Funds and
associated State matching funds.
AND WHEREAS,the City of Brookings will request the consultant services of Banners
Associates, Inc. to design this project for an estimated cost of$66,700.00.
30 �
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:That the South Dakota Depaxtment of
Transportation be and hereby is authorized and xequested to program for construction,in
accordance with the"Secondary Road Plan" and the State's "Standaxd Specifications for
Roads and Bridges" the project described. Estimated Design Cost of Project: $66,700.00;
Estimated Cost of Project: $1,250,000.00; STP Funds: $1,879,520.35. Local Funds (if
needed to meet construction year): $0. Proposed Year of Construction: 2010
Action: Motion to approve, request public comment, roll call
Ordinance No. OS-09: First reading was held on Ordinance No. OS-09,an ordinance regulating
ultimate fighting contests in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Public Hearing.• March 10t6
Resolurion No. 19-09—Street Vacation. Public hearing was held on Resolution No. 19-09, a
resolution to vacate Ninth Street from the west side of 14`�Avenue to the Student Center Lane
roadway on the SDSU Campus. Hearing.• Terri Veen, SDSU employee, objected to the street vacation. A
motion was made by Reed,seconded by McClemans, to approve Resolution No. 19-09. All present
voted yes;motion carried.
Resolution No. 19-09
Street Vacation
WHEREAS,a petition to vacate has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Brookings,and
WHEREAS, the petition was filed in proper form and signed by one hundxed percent (100%) of the
adjacent property owners.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Brookings:
That the portion of 9�'Street from the west right-of-line of 14�'Avenue east 488 feet to the west
edge of the Student Center Lane roadway on the SDSU Campus is hereby vacated subject to a right-
af-way easement over the west 80 feet thexeof.
Adjourn• A motion was made by Reed, seconded by Whaley, to adjourn. All present voted yes;
motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
CITY O OOKINGS
Sco D stennan,Mayox
T:
=�pOr�,,...%Y�F
c�: �
y� ✓9
O= ��
�O�
Gr��;' rnes,City Clexk