Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019_11_12 CC PKTCity Council City of Brookings Meeting Agenda Brookings City Council Brookings City & County Government Center 520 3rd St., Suite 230 Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: (605) 692-6281 Fax: (605) 692-6907 "We are an inclusive, diverse, connected community that fuels the creative class, embraces sustainability and pursues a complete lifestyle. We are committed to building a bright future through dedication, generosity and authenticity. Bring your dreams!" Council Chambers5:00 PMTuesday, November 12, 2019 The City of Brookings is committed to providing a high quality of life for its citizens and fostering a diverse economic base through innovative thinking, strategic planning, and proactive, fiscally responsible municipal management. 5:00 PM STUDY SESSION 1.ID 2019-0472 Presentation of the City of Brookings Snow and Ice Removal Operations Plan. PlanAttachments: 6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING 1. Call to Order / Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Record of Council Attendance. 3. Consent Agenda: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call Matters appearing on the Consent Agenda are expected to be non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Council at one time, without discussion, unless a member of the Council or City Manager requests an opportunity to address any given item. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be discussed at the beginning of the formal items. Approval by the Council of the Consent Agenda items means that the recommendation of the City Manager is approved along with the terms and conditions described in the agenda supporting documentation. 3.A. Action to approve the agenda. 3.B.ID 2019-0458 Action to approve the October 22, 2019 City Council minutes. Page 1 City of Brookings November 12, 2019City Council Meeting Agenda 10/22/2019 MinutesAttachments: 3.C.ID 2019-0470 Action on annual Liquor and Wine Alcohol License Renewals for 2020. 3.D.RES 19-086 Action to approve Resolution 19-086, a Resolution authorizing Change Order No. 1, Final, for 2019-11STI Airport Sanitary Sewer Project; Meyer Services Inc. Resolution Map Attachments: 4. Items removed from Consent Agenda. Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call 5. Open Forum/Presentations/Reports: 5.A. Open Forum. At this time, any member of the public may request time on the agenda for an item not listed. Items are typically scheduled for the end of the meeting; however, very brief announcements or invitations will be allowed at this time. 5.B. SDSU Student Association Report. 5.C.ID 2019-0469 3rd Quarter CFO’s Report. CFO Report Sales Tax Receipts Attachments: 5.D.ID 2019-0442 Sustainability Council Report on Plastic Bag Reduction / Elimination. Memo Report List of Cities with Plastic Bag Bans Attachments: 6. Contracts/Change Orders: 6.A.RES 19-087 Action on Resolution 19-087, a Resolution Awarding Bids on Edgebrook Golf Cart Lease. Memo Resolution Attachments: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call 7. Ordinance First Readings: None The title of the Ordinance is read. No vote is required on the first reading of an Ordinance. Public Comment and Council discussion is permitted. The date for the second reading is announced. Page 2 City of Brookings November 12, 2019City Council Meeting Agenda 8. Public Hearings and Second Readings: None 9. Other Business: 9.A.ID 2019-0468 Action on a Legal Services Agreement between the City of Brookings and Steven J. Britzman, Attorney at Law for a one year contract (01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020). Memo 2020 Contract - Marked 2020 Contract - Clean Attachments: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call 10. City Council member introduction of topics for future discussion. Any Council Member may request discussion of any issue at a future meeting only. Items cannot be added for action at this meeting. A motion and second is required stating the issue, requested outcome, and time. A majority vote is required. 11. Executive Session ID 2019-0478 Executive Session, pursuant to SDCL 1-25-2, for purposes of consulting with legal counsel or reviewing communications from legal counsel about proposed or pending litigation or contractual matters. Action: Motion to enter Executive Session, Voice Vote Action: Motion to exit Executive Session, Voice Vote 12. Adjourn. Brookings City Council: Keith Corbett, Mayor; Patty Bacon, Deputy Mayor Council Members Leah Brink, Dan Hansen, Ope Niemeyer, Holly Tilton Byrne, and Nick Wendell Council Staff: Paul M. Briseno, City Manager Steven Britzman, City Attorney Bonnie Foster, City Clerk View the City Council Meeting Live on the City Government Access Channel 9. Rebroadcast Schedule: Wednesday 1:00pm/Thursday 7:00pm/Friday 9:00pm/Saturday 1:00pm The complete City Council agenda packet is available on the city website: www.cityofbrookings.org Assisted Listening Systems (ALS) are available upon request by contacting (605) 692-6281. If you require additional assistance, alternative formats, and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact Susan Rotert, City Human Resources Director and ADA Coordinator at (605) 692-6281 at least three working days prior to the meeting. Page 3 City of Brookings City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0472,Version:1 Presentation of the City of Brookings Snow and Ice Removal Operations Plan. Summary: Matt Bartley, Street Superintendent / Project Manager, will present the Snow and Ice Removal Operations Plan to the City Council and public. This presentation will share the decision making process, staff involvement, and the resources required for snow and ice removal operations on streets and alleys in the City of Brookings. The intent of the work session is to educate the public and Council of the City’s process and opportunities for notification when the plan is enacted. Attachments: Snow and Ice Removal Operations Plan City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ CITY OF BROOKINGS SNOW / ICE REMOVAL OPERATION PLAN, VERSION 2019 A.INTRODUCTION B.GENERAL POLICYSTATEMENTS C.STORMCLASSIFICATIONS D.IMPLEMENTATIONPROCEDURES 1.WEATHER/STORMDECISIONS 2.PERSONNELNOTIFICATION/RECALL 3.DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY ROUTE SNOW ADVISORY/ SNOW ALERT E.SNOW ROUTES, AREAS, PRIORITIES ANDRESPONSIBILITIES 1 CITY OFBROOKINGS 2 CONTRACTORS F.SNOW/ICE REMOVAL POLICIES ANDPROCEDURES 1.EMERGENCY SNOW ROUTETICKET/TOWING PROCEDURES 2.DE-ICER AND ABRASIVE APPLICATION 3.MEDIAINTERFACE 4.ACCIDENTS G.STAFF AND EQUIPMENTASSIGNMENTS H.PRE-WINTER SEASONPREPARATION 1.SAFETYTRAINING 2.OPERATORTRAINING/CERTIFICATION 3.EQUIPMENT PRE-INSPECTION ANDCALIBRATION I.POST OPERATIONSPROCEDURES A.INTRODUCTION: 1.The purpose of the Snow and Ice Removal Operation Plan is to provide all personnel who are involved in snow and ice removal, and the public a single source of information which clearly defines the City of Brookings’s policies and procedures in all snow and ice operations. 2.Snow and Ice operations will be accomplished as expeditiously as possible in conjunction with the priorities outlined in thisplan due to public safety and economic impact 3.The Snow and Ice season in Eastern South Dakota can begin as early as October and terminate as late as late-April. The rate of accumulation of snowfall or icing is affected by atmosphere temperature, pavement temperature, moisture content, wind direction and velocity, and intervals between storms. Each storm is unique, and conditions may vary across the city. Therefore, while this plan tries to cover the major operations during a Snow and Ice storm, it must be recognized that there must be sufficient flexibility within the plan to provide differences and or contingencies in order to respond effectively to actualconditions. B.GENERAL POLICYSTATEMENTS: 1.The policy of the City of Brookings is to clear Emergency Snow Routes and Public Safety Facilities of snow and ice as expeditiously as practicable within the City’s area of responsibility during and following every storm through the use of equipment and applicable materials 2.Snow and Ice control operations on all roads will be prioritized based on immediate need for the public safety. Emergency snow routes will be given the first priority for plowing and de-icing during and after a storm. The intent is for all Emergency Snow Routes to be kept open when possible. Emergency routes are shown in RED on the Snow Removal Map. a.No parking shall be permitted upon any portion of an Emergency Snow Route where two (2) or more inches of snow have fallen in any 24-hour period until such Emergency Snow Route has been cleaned of snow from curb to curb. Any vehicles parked upon an Emergency Snow Route shall be subject to ticketing and towing. 3.Snow removal and de-icing operations at the end of the storm, or during times deemed necessary will be shifted to non-emergency main artilleries and collector roads within city limits. These are shown in GREEN and BLUE on the Snow Removal Map 4.At the end of the precipitation event, snow removal and de-icing operations will be shifted to all remaining residential streets, cul-de- sacs and alley ways within city limits. 5.The downtown core area will be cleared during or after emergency route removal operations are complete or as manpower and equipment resources become available. This is typically done between the early morning hours of 1:00am – 7:00am. It is important for sidewalk snow and ice removal operations be completed prior to street snow and ice removal operations. (see Sec. 74-2) This ensures that the work has to be done only one time per storm. 6.All other sidewalks are to be maintained by the adjacent property owners per City Code. a.Sec. 74-211. Duty of owner or occupant. It shall be the duty of the owner or occupant or person in possession or in charge of any lot, parcel or plat of ground fronting or abutting any sidewalk, to keep such sidewalk free and clear from snow and ice at all times. When it is impossible to clear snow and ice from a sidewalk because it is frozen to the sidewalk, the owner, occupant, or person in possession or in charge of such lot shall sprinkle or spread some suitable material upon the same to prevent the walk from becoming slippery and dangerous to travel upon. b.Sec. 74-2 Deposits in rights-of-way; exception for sidewalk snow removal in central business district. It is unlawful for any person to shovel or deposit snow, leaves, material or other substances of any king and description from private property onto any public street, alley or public right of way. Such conduct or action is declared to be a nuisance. This section however, does not prohibit the placement of snow from a sidewalk in the central business district in the curb area of the street where no boulevard or other property exists to place snow from the sidewalk. 7.Snow removal and de-icing operations will not be undertaken in alleys unless there are snow accumulations in excess of 4” or ice accumulations in excess of ½” as verified by Street Department staff. 8.A Winter Storm Alert can only be declared by the Street Superintendent, Acting Street Superintendent, or in their absence, the Chief of Police or the City Manager. Notice of a Winter Storm Alert will be given by posting on the City Cable Television Channel, and by issuanceof a notification to the public via print, website, social media and other digital materials. In the event of a declaration of a Storm Alert, the Police will ticket or tow vehicles located on all Emergency Snow Routes as necessary to expedite the Snow and Ice removal operations. 9.City personnel will not clear plowed-in driveways. Clearing driveways is the citizens’ responsibility. The plowing operation produces a continuous windrow of snow, and by its nature is expected to block some citizens’ cleared driveways when there is significant snow accumulated in the street. 10.The Street Superintendent may provide the media with Snow/Ice removal updates during and after storm operations to keep the public informed of the conditions of the roads. The City Snow Hotline, telephone number 696-7669, and may be called for updates on City Snow removal operations. C.STORMCLASSIFICATIONS: 1.Each Snow or Ice storm will be unique and vary in intensity, duration and total precipitation. This section will apply a basic classification system to assist in establishment of priorities of equipment, material manpower, and a management system for implementation in all Snow and Ice removal operations. The storm classification system will utilize an estimated total expected snowfall for snow and total ice glazing for icestorms. This information will come from multiple weather sources including; NOAA, Keloland and the National Weather Service. 2.Classes of Storms: Class 1: 0” – 2” a.Class 1 storm is defined as a storm with accumulations of two inches or less, which in most cases will only require light plowing and treating of pavement with applicable materials. All controls and reporting of when the decision is made to proceed with snow and ice removal operations will be managed by the Street Superintendent. During a Class 1 storm City crews will handle snow removal or deicing operations. Contractors will not be activated. Class 2 Storm: 2”- 6” Emergency Route Snow Advisory b.Class 2 is defined as a storm of moderate to heavy snowfall with estimated range of two - six inches. A Class 2 storm will cause an issuance of an emergency route snow advisory. During a Class 2 storm event there is no parking on Emergency snow routes. Those routes will be given the first priority for plowing and de-icing. The intent is for all Emergency Snow Routes to be kept open when possible. A Snow Alert is possible if the actual conditions warrant. All controls and reporting of when and what equipment will be implemented for snow and ice removal operations will be managed by the Street Superintendent. During a Class 2 Storm, the Street Superintendent may use City crews within all departments or decide to activate contractors to plow their designated areas. Class 3 Storm: 6”+ , Snow Alert c.Class 3 storm is defined as a storm of extremely heavy snow of six inches or more occurring in a period of 24 hours or less. This type of storm will cause life threatening conditions to occur. When weather forecasts indicate that a Class 3 storm is imminent all appropriate city equipment will be mobilized immediately. The Street Superintendent, Acting Street Superintendent, or in their absence, the Chief of Police or the City Manager, will declare a Snow Alert. At that time a Parking ban on all City streets will be implemented and enforced. The declaring official shall make the appropriate media notifications of the Snow Alert. Parking ban on all City streets will be enforced. A class 3 storm will activate all contactors to plow their designated areas. d.Ice Storms. All Ice Storms will be rated as a Class 1 type storm. Ice Storms will cause an immediate threat to the public safety. If an Ice Storm is forecast as imminent or otherwise develops, the City will follow Class 1 procedures. D.IMPLEMENTATIONPROCEDURES: 1.Weather/Storm Decisions: a.During normal duty and non-duty hours the key personnel (Street Superintendent or their designees) involved in Snow and Ice control will monitor forecast storms utilizing the National Weather Service, and local news outlets for updated weather information. If a Class 1 storm is predicted, the Street Superintendent will monitor conditions to verify equipment needs. During a Class 2 storm event, an Emergency Route Snow Advisory will be issued, but a Snow Alert may or may not be activated. City crews will monitor conditions to determine the need for a Snow Alert. For Class 3 storms a Snow Alert will be issued by the Street Superintendent. b.In the event of a surprise storm outside normal work hours, the police dispatcher will, based on police observations, call the Street Superintendent, alerting them of the storm conditions. The Street Superintendent will make the decision to dispatch the appropriate personnel and equipment for the conditions. 2.Personnel Notification/Recall: a.It is imperative that the Street Department and other city departments maintain a current and validated recall roster during the snow and ice season. Quick response is the key to successful implementation of this plan. The Street Superintendent will prepare an active recall roster. 3.Declaration of a Winter Emergency Route Snow Advisory / Snow Alert: a.Only the Street Superintendent or Acting Street Superintendent can declare a Snow Advisory or Alert. In their absence, this decision is delegated to the Chief of Police and/or the City Manager. b.Emergency Route Snow Advisory will be issued for a snow event that requires Emergency Routes be cleared. This is done to ensure that emergency services can access all quadrants of town. During a Emergency Route Snow Advisory, Emergency Snow Routes will cleaned of snow from curb to curb. Any vehicles parked upon an Emergency Snow Route shall be subject to ticketing and towing 1)When an Emergency Route Snow Advisory has been declared, the declaring official will contact the media by posting or announcing that a Snow Advisory has been declared and all vehicles not removed from Emergency Routes will be subject to ticketing and towing. c.Snow Alerts will be issued for snow events that will require all available equipment and manpower to clear all City streets, alleys and cul-de-sacs. Emergency Routes will maintain a priority during Snow Alerts and may be cleared multiple times during the same event. The issuance of a Snow Alert will automatically implement a Parking Ban. This is done to ensure crews and their equipment can operate in a safe and efficient manner. 1)When a Snow Alert has been declared, the declaring official will contact the media by announcing that a Snow Alert has been declared and all vehicles not removed from all city streets will be subject to ticketing and towing. d.The declaring official will notify the City of Brookings key personnel. This includes the City Manager, Police Chief, Police Dispatch and the Fire Department. e.Ticketing and towing operations will be conducted by the City of Brookings Police Department. Section F.1 of this plan covers specifics for these procedures. E.SNOW ROUTES, AREAS, PRIORITIES ANDRESPONSIBILITIES: 1.City of Brookings a.The priorities for Snow and Ice removal will be as follows: (note Priorities may be adjusted due to specific storm conditions): 1)Emergency snow routes designated in RED on the Emergency Snow Route Map 2)Major arterial and collector routes designated GREEN and BLUE on the Snow Removal Map 3)Other through streets. 4)Cul-de-sacs and other streets with no outlet. 5)Alleys when snow accumulation greater than 4”, or ice accumulation greater than ½” as confirmed by Street Superintendent. A) Annex 1 is the emergency snow route map. B) Annex 2 is the City/Contractor snow maps 2.Contractors a.The City uses contractors to help assist in the snow removal process. Contractors are given a designated are of town, and they focus in that area only. This is done for consistency and effectiveness towards time. The Street Superintendent will provide them with maps of their area, and will also follow on contractor work quality and progress during snow removal operations. F.SNOW/ICE REMOVAL POLICIES ANDPROCEDURES: 1.Emergency Snow Routes - Ticket/Towing Procedures. a.Whenever snow has accumulated or there is a possibility that snow will accumulate to such a depth of 2” or more, snow removal operations will be required on Emergency Snow Routes, the Street Superintendent, Acting Superintendent, or in their absences, the Chief of Police, or City Manager, may declare a Snow Advisory, and until such traffic emergency is terminated, it shall be unlawful: 1)To park a vehicle on any street designated as an Emergency SnowRoute. 2)To operate a motor vehicle on any Emergency Snow Route in such manner or condition that such motor vehicle stalls and is unable to proceed. 3)Improperly parked or stalled vehicles as noted in 1) and 2) shall be ticketed and towed at the owner’sexpense. 4)The following Streets are Established Emergency Snow Routes: (as shown in Appendix 1) 1st Avenue … from 6th Street to Front Street Front Street … from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue 3rd Street … from 3rd Avenue to 22nd Avenue, excluding North side parking from 3rd Avenue to 5th Avenue Medary Avenue … from Highway 14 Bypass to 20th Street South, excluding West side parking from 8th Street to 9th Street 2.Snow Alert Parking Ban - Ticket/Towing Procedures. a.Whenever snow has accumulated or there is a possibility that snow will accumulate to 4+” and that snow removal operations will be required for the entire town, the Street Superintendent, Acting Superintendent, or in their absences, the Chief of Police, or City Manager, may declare a Snow Alert Parking Ban, and until such traffic emergency is terminated, it shall be unlawful: 1)To park a vehicle on any street, cul-de-sac or alley. 2)To operate a motor vehicle on any street within the city limits in such manner or condition that such motor vehicle stalls and is unable to proceed. 3)Improperly parked or stalled vehicles as noted in 1) and 2) shall be ticketed and towed at the owner’sexpense. b.A minimum of a 4-hour notice must be provided to the public by the initiating official. This allows for citizens to move vehicles, trailers and equipment out of the roadways. c.Parking Ban Information City of Brookings webpage Notify Me text and email notification alert system Social Media “Snow Line”: (605) 696-7669 Television: KDLT, KELO, KSFY, or Cable Channel 9 FM Radio: 93.7, 96.5, 102.3, 104.7, or 107.1 AM Radio: 910 or 1430 Other means deemed necessary due to changes of the above outlets. NOTE: When parked vehicles or other obstructions left in the street make the plowing or abrasive application unsafe, risky, or unproductive to the detriment of operations on other streets, the area in question will be skipped until such time as removal activities may be done safely and efficiently. 3.Media Interface: a.It is imperative that the general public be informed on a regular basis during Class 2 and 3 storms of the city’s efforts both successful and not so successful in all aspects of Snow and Ice removal operations. b.All media releases will be by the Street Superintendent, Acting Street Superintendent, Public Information Officer or other designated official. 4.Accidents: a.All accidents involving city vehicles occurring during Snow and Ice removal operations will be reported immediately by cell phone from snow equipment to the Street Superintendent. 1)Accidents are to be reported as follows. a)Vehicular Damage - An accident report will be filled out at the scene of the accident in addition to the radio report. Standard accident procedures and forms will be utilized. Additionally, a law enforcement officer will investigate the accident at the scene prior to resumption of Snow and Ice removal operations by the city vehicle involved. b)Private Property Damage - (Mail Boxes, sprinkler systems, and other private improvements) - Your mailbox and the access to it for the U.S. Postal Service is the responsibility of the resident. Again, because the crews have no place to put the snow, curbside mailboxes may become blocked and in those cases it is the responsibility of the resident to move that snow beyond the street so that the postal service may access the mailbox. Heavy snow pushed or thrown by the plow may damage mailboxes. This is not intentional, but does occasionally happen. The City is not responsible for damage to mailboxes or other private improvements placed within the road rights-of-way of its roads that occurs as a result of snow and ice removal operations. c)Claim filing procedure- Any claims for insurance purposes will be completed at the Street Department office at 125 7th Ave. or, the City Human Resource Department at 520 3 rd St Suite 230. After completion the claimant paperwork will then be processed for approval. G.STAFF AND EQUIPMENTASSIGNMENTS: 1.At the beginning of a Class 2 or 3 Storm the Street Department will immediately commence operation. 2.The Street Department will be the primary staff and equipment resource for all snow and ice removal operations. However, during sustained snow and ice removal operations other departments may be asked by the Street Superintendent to provide both staff and equipment resources to support the in snow and ice removal operations. 3.Due to personnel and extent of winter weather events, it may not be feasible to work shifts during extended storm events. For safe operations, every effort will be made to have as many streets in serviceable condition as possible in accordance with the storm route priorities in as short a time as feasible. If operations are not complete prior to personnel working for 15 continuous hours beginning when they reported to work, whether for their regular shift or specifically for emergency call out, operations will cease and personnel will be sent home to rest and sleep. Employees will report back to work no sooner than six (6) hours from the time operations ceased. H.PRE-WINTER SEASONPREPARATION: 1.Safety Training: Commencing in October and continuing through the fall and winter seasons, the Street Superintendent will schedule recurring training that will focus on snow and ice controlissues. a.City operations personnel will hold meetings to discuss known strengths and weaknesses in preparation for the snow and ice season. These meetings will be conducted by the Street Superintendent. b.Practice runs of the routes will be driven by all operators prior to mid-November to ensure all are familiar with the Emergency Snow Routes and their designated areas. 2.Operator Training/Certification: New operators will be assigned to an experienced operator to receive training on all phases of snow and ice control. New operators will receive this training in pre-season and during the actual snow and ice control season. The trainer of the new operator will at the time of the new operator proficiency, certify to the Street Superintendent of city operations that the new operator is cleared for individual (solo) operation. Operators will not be assigned to equipment that they are not qualified to operate under anycircumstance. 3.Equipment Pre-Inspection and Calibration: Commencing in October, the Street Division will prepare and ensure all snow and ice removal equipment is prepared and operational for mounting to its assigned piece of equipment. a.All salt/sand spreaders will be calibrated and certified by theStreet Superintendent, or his designee, to ensure maximum efficiency. b.Salt and sand spreaders will be mounted on the assigned truck after the end of the annual construction season or at such time as directed by the Street Superintendent. I.POST OPERATIONSPROCEDURES: 1.During storms, and after each shift, the operator will perform the required maintenance and services on his assigned equipment. These services include the following: FILL FUEL TANKS CHECK LIGHTS CHECK ALL FLUIDS INSPECT FOR FLUID LEAKS FILL WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID CHECK TIRE PRESSURE CHECK TENSION ON CHAINS (TIRE AND SPREADER) FILL SALT/SAND HOPPER WITH MATERIAL CHECK CUTTING EDGES ON EQUIPMENT 2.After storms, all equipment will receive a thorough inspection by the operators. Vehicles will be washed. All known deficiencies will be reported to the Street Superintendent for immediate correction. Repairs of snow and ice removal equipment will be first priority during winter storm season. APENDIX 1 – Emergency snow removal route map APENDIX 2 – City/Contractor snow removal maps NORTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST SOUTH WEST City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0458,Version:1 Action to approve the October 22, 2019 City Council minutes. Attachments: 11/22/2019 Minutes City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Brookings City Council October 22, 2019 (unapproved) The Brookings City Council held a meeting on Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 6:00 PM, at City Hall with the following City Council members present: Mayor Keith Corbett, Council Members Patty Bacon, Leah Brink, Dan Hansen, Holly Tilton Byrne, Nick Wendell, and Ope Niemeyer (via phone). Absent: Council Member Tilton Byrne and City Manager Paul Briseno. City Attorney Steve Britzman, and City Clerk Bonnie Foster were also present. 6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING Consent Agenda:A motion was made by Council Member Wendell, seconded by Council Member Hansen, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Brink, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. 3.A. Action to approve the agenda. 3.B. Action to approve the October 8, 2019 City Council Minutes. Open Forum. Mayor Corbett read a Proclamation declaring "Bring the Blue Week" celebrating ESPN bringing their College GameDay Show to Brookings on October 26, 2019. MAYORAL PROCLAMATION CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA WHEREAS, the City of Brookings and South Dakota State University will host ESPN College GameDay from 8:00 until 11:00 a.m. for the Dakota Marker football game to be held on Saturday, October 26th, 2019; and WHEREAS, the South Dakota State University and rival North Dakota State University Dakota Marker kickoff is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. at the Dana J. Dykhouse Stadium; and WHEREAS, this is the first time ESPN College GameDay is being held in South Dakota; and WHEREAS, it is the 150th Anniversary of College Football; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Keith W. Corbett, Mayor of the City of Brookings, do hereby proclaim October 21st through October 26th, 2019 as BRING THE BLUE WEEK and call upon all of Brookings to wear blue to support and celebrate the South Dakota State University students, staff, and faculty. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have placed the Seal of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota, this 22nd day of October, 2019. Keith W. Corbett, Mayor Recognition of City Attorney Steve Britzman. The City Council recognized Steve Britzman for his commitment and dedication to excellence in government as the City Attorney for the City of Brookings. City Attorney Steve Britzman received the Distinguished Service Award from the South Dakota Municipal Attorney’s Association at the South Dakota Municipal League Conference held in Aberdeen on October 8-11, 2019. The award was presented in recognition of and appreciation for Steve’s outstanding contributions and commitment to the South Dakota Municipal Attorney’s Association. National Disability Employment Awareness Month Proclamation. Mayor Corbett presented a proclamation recognizing October 2019 as National Disability Employment Awareness Month. Mark Sternhagen, Chair of the Brookings Committee for People who have Disabilities, accepted the Proclamation. Mayoral Proclamation City of Brookings, South Dakota WHEREAS, the National Disability Employment Awareness Month 2019 Theme is “The Right Talent, Right Now;” and WHEREAS, this is a time to celebrate the contributions and talents of Americans with disabilities, which make our city’s workforce an economic strength; and WHEREAS, workplaces welcoming of the talents of all people, including people with disabilities, are a critical part of our efforts to build an inclusive community and strong economy; and WHEREAS, National Disability Employment Awareness Month will honor the thirtieth anniversary of the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a celebration that will run through 2020; and WHEREAS, today more than ever, there is a race for talent, and smart businesses are navigating this by tapping into more talent pools, including people with disabilities, who offer not just needed skills, but also creative ways of thinking about how to solve problems and achieve business success; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, KEITH W. CORBETT, Mayor of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, hereby proclaim October 2019 as National Disability Employment Awareness Month. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set forth my hand and caused to be affixed the Great Seal of the City of Brookings, this 22nd day of October, 2019. Keith W. Corbett, Mayor Department Presentation: Street. Matt Bartley, Street Department Director, presented an update to the City Council and the public on Street Department operations. Resolution 19-085. A public hearing was held on Resolution 19-085, a Resolution Levying Assessment for Project 2018-01SWR, 2018 Sidewalk Repair Sites. A motion was made by Council Member Wendell, seconded by Council Member Hansen, that Resolution 19-085 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 6 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Brink, Bacon, and Wendell; Absent: 1 - Tilton Byrne. Resolution 19-085 - A Resolution Levying Assessment for Project 2018-01SWR 2018; Sidewalk Repair Sites Whereas, the City Council has provided for sidewalk repair work to be completed under Project 2018-01SWR, 2018 Sidewalk Repair Sites. Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, as follows: 1.The City Council has made all investigation and authorized by Resolution 18-051, which deem the work necessary and have found and determined that the amount which each lot or tract will be benefited by the construction of the sidewalk improvement heretofore designated as Concrete Maintenance Project 2018-01SWR is the amount stated in the proposed assessment roll. 2.The assessment for Sidewalk Assessment Project 2018-01SWR is hereby approved and the assessment thereby specified are levied against each and every lot, piece or parcel of land thereby described. 3.Such assessments, unless paid within thirty (30) days after the date of mailing of a statement of account by the City, shall be collected by the City in accordance with the procedure for Plan One in Sections 9-43, South Dakota Compiled Laws of 1967, as amended with interest of 10% on the unpaid balance. 4.Assessments amounting to less than $300.00 shall be paid in one payment. City Council Member introduction of topics for future discussion. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Wendell, to add the development and/or approval of a Brookings Youth Council to the December 10 th City Council Meeting either at a study session or the regular meeting. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 6 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Brink, Bacon, and Wendell; Absent: 1 - Tilton Byrne. Adjourn.A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that this meeting be adjourned at 6:31 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CITY OF BROOKINGS __________________________ ATTEST: Keith W. Corbett, Mayor __________________________ Bonnie Foster, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0470,Version:1 Action on annual Liquor and Wine Alcohol License Renewals for 2020. Summary: Enclosed for City Council review and action are the Annual Liquor and Wine License renewals for 2020. All required documentation has been submitted. Liquor (Off-Sale): 1.Brookings Municipal Liquor Store, 780 22nd Ave. So. Liquor (On-Sale): 1.Park Hospitality, Inc., 2500 6th St. (CL) 2.Applebee’s / Porter Apple Co. B Inc., 3001 LeFevre Dr. 3.Buffalo Wild Wings Bar & Grill / W&P of Brookings, LLC, 1801 6 th St. 4.Craft Fusion / Jesse Davis, LLC, 610 Medary Ave. 5.Cubby’s Sports Bar & Grill / GDT Inc., 307 Main Ave. 6.Danny’s / David Olson Inc., 703 Main Ave. So. 7.Elks Club Lodge #1490, 516 4th St. 8.Jim’s Tap / Urquhart Ent., Inc., 309 Main Ave. 9.The Lodge / Den Wil Hospitality Group, Inc., 2515 6th St. 10.9 Bar Nightclub / Nine Inc., 303 Main Ave. 11.Old Market Eatery, LLC, 424 5th St. 12.Pheasant Restaurant & Lounge / RGO, Inc., 726 Main Ave. So. 13.Pints & Quarts / KR Hospitality, Inc., 313 Main Ave. 14.Prairie Lanes Inc., 722 Western Ave. 15.The Ram / Ram & O’Hare’s Ent., LLC, 327 Main Ave. 16.Ray’s Corner / Fergen Enterprises Inc., 401 Main Ave. 17.Skinner’s Pub, Inc., 300 Main Ave. 18.Sully’s Irish Pub / B&L Sullivan Inc., 421 Main Ave. 19.VFW GEO Dokken Post 2118, 520 Main Ave. 20.Wilbert’s/Comfort Suites University / Den Wil Hospitality Group, 25th Ave. 21.The Wild Hare / Wonder, Inc., 303 3rd St. Restaurant (On-Sale): 1.Whiskey Creek Wood Fire Grill / Brookings Steak Co., LLC, 621 32nd Ave. Wine (On-Off Sale): 1.Brookings Municipal Liquor Store, 780 22nd Ave. So. 2.Cenex Zip Trip #63 / CHS, Inc., 1005 6th St. 3.Cenex Zip Trip #64 / CHS, Inc., 3045 LeFevre Dr. 4.Children’s Museum of South Dakota, 521 4th St. 5.The Depot / ERL, LLC, 919 20th St. So. 6.Deuces Casino, Commonwealth Gaming & Holdings Co., 223 6th St., Suite 105A 7.Deuces Casino, Commonwealth Gaming & Holdings Co., 223 6th St., Suite 105B 8.Deuces Casino, Commonwealth Gaming & Holdings Co., 223 6th St., Suite 105C th City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:ID 2019-0470,Version:1 9.Guadalajara Mexican Restaurant, 1715 6th St., Suite F 10.Hy-Vee Food Store / Hy-Vee, Inc., 700 22nd Ave. So. 11.McCrory Gardens Educational & Visitors Center, 6th St. & 22nd Ave. 12.New Sake / Sake, Inc., 724 22nd Ave. So. 13.Old Sanctuary / Old Sanctuary Assoc., LLC, 928 4th St. 14.Pheasant Restaurant & Lounge / RGO, Inc., 726 Main Ave. So. 15.Schoon’s Pump N’ Pak So. / Schoon Properties, Inc., 1205 Main Ave. So. 16.Swiftel Center, 824 32nd Ave. 17.Wal-Mart Supercenter #1538 / Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2233 6 th St. 18.Wilbert’s/Comfort Suites University / Den Wil Hospitality Group, 25th Ave. 19.Wooden Legs Brewing Co., 309 5th St., Suite 100 20.Yessica’s Restaurant, 1300 Main Ave. So. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 19-086,Version:1 Action to approve Resolution 19-086, a Resolution authorizing Change Order No. 1, Final, for 2019- 11STI Airport Sanitary Sewer Project; Meyer Services Inc. Summary: This resolution will approve Change Order No. 1, Final, for 2019-11STI Airport Sanitary Sewer Project for a total decrease of $5,479.00 to the contract and extend the final completion date to September 20, 2019 to close out the project. Background: The Brookings Regional Airport budgeted to install 10” sanitary sewer and manholes to serve the business hangar area located west of the Airport Fire and Rescue building. A new aviation hangar was constructed in 2018 in this area and the sanitary sewer will serve the new hangar and future hangars as development continues to grow. The project has been completed and is ready to be closed out. This change order will adjust plan quantities to current as-constructed quantities for a total decrease of $5,479.00 to the contract to close out the project. The contractor met the substantial completion date of June 15, 2019. However, the final completion date was extended to September 20, 2019 for the conditions to be dry enough to install seeding. The summary is as follows: Original Contract Price:$114,034.00 Increase from Previously Approved Change Orders:$0.00 Contract Price Prior to this Change Order:$114,034.00 Decrease of this Change Order (No. 1 Final):$5,479.00 Contract Price incorporating this Change Order:$108,555.00 Fiscal Impact: There will be a decrease of $5,479.00 to the contract for this project. Recommendation: Recommend approval of the change order. Attachments: Resolution Map City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Resolution 19-086 Resolution Authorizing Change Order No. 1 (Final) for 2019-11STI Airport Sanitary Sewer Project, Meyer Services, Inc. Be It Resolved by the City Council that the following change order be allowed for 2019- 11STI, Airport Taxilane Project: Construction Change Order Number 1: Adjust plan quantities to as-constructed quantities for a total decrease of $5,479.00 to the contract and adjust the final completion date to September 20, 2019 to close out the project. Passed and approved this 12th day of November, 2019. CITY OF BROOKINGS ________________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Bonnie Foster, City Clerk 2019‐11STI Airport Sanitary Sewer Project      City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0469,Version:1 3rd Quarter CFO’s Report. Summary: Chief Financial Officer, Erick Rangel, will present the 3rd Quarter Financial Report to the City Council and members of the public. Attachments: 3rd Quarter Financial Report Sales Tax Receipts City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Brookings City Council Meeting CFO’s Repot November 12, 2019 .5 M 2.5 M 4.5 M 6.5 M 8.5 M 10.5 M 12.5 M 2018 A 2019 A 19-Budget 2018 A 2019 A 19-Budget 2 2019 Jan –Sep Tax Revenue & Other Income A Actuals Δ Variance B Budget Revenue Tax Collected vs LY vs Budget2019 Tax Revenue & Other Income 2.4%4.3% Other Income –Other revenues for General and CIP Funds, excludes transfers (i.e. grants, fees, interest income) REVENUES (TH):FY2019 B Prorated YTD 2019 B 2019 YTD A Δ $ F/(U)Δ% Sales Tax: 1st Penny $6,818,600 $5,113,950 $5,373,175 $259,225 5.1% 2nd Penny $6,867,480 $5,150,610 $5,405,647 $255,037 5.0% 3rd Penny $969,000 $726,750 $793,195 $66,445 9.1% BID (Pillow Tax)$400,000 $300,000 $205,868 ($94,132)(31.4%) Total $15,055,080 $11,291,310 $11,777,885 $486,575 4.3% Property Tax:$3,236,500 $2,427,375 $1,745,256 ($682,119)(28.1%) Other Income $4,285,557 $3,214,168 $3,155,031 ($59,137)(1.8%) Grand Total $22,577,137 $16,932,853 $16,678,172 ($254,681)(1.5%) 3 Jan -September 2019 Budget vs Actuals General Fund Capital Improvement Projects & Other A Actuals Δ Variance B Budget * All Other –Other Government , Special, Capital Projects and Enterprise Funds managed by the City. Numbers exclude 3Q Swiftel Center results as they are finalizing their Financial System migration EXPENDITURES:FY2019 B Prorated YTD 2019 B 2019YTD A Δ $ (F)/U % Used Mayor & Council $127,528 $95,646 $63,045 ($32,601)49.4% City Clerk $323,170 $242,378 $145,156 ($97,221)44.9% City Manager $461,743 $346,307 $319,247 ($27,061)69.1% City Attorney $118,919 $89,189 $77,833 ($11,357)65.5% Human Resources $253,798 $190,348 $177,220 ($13,128)69.8% Finance $498,647 $373,985 $394,889 $20,904 79.2% IT $259,558 $194,668 $157,288 ($37,381)60.6% Government Buildings $184,346 $138,260 $16,008 ($122,252)8.7% Community Development $513,415 $385,062 $343,458 ($41,603)66.9% Engineering $540,359 $405,269 $382,619 ($22,650)70.8% County Reimbursement $406,226 $304,670 $209,079 ($95,591)51.5% Police Department $3,827,315 $2,870,486 $2,585,632 ($284,854)67.6% Fire Department $692,105 $519,079 $520,052 $973 75.1% Hydrant Rental $95,795 $71,846 $64,477 ($7,370)67.3% Street Department $2,672,041 $2,004,030 $2,070,492 $66,461 77.5% Animal Control $146,388 $109,791 $99,555 ($10,236)68.0% Dakota Nature Park $122,528 $91,896 $68,851 ($23,045)56.2% Aquatic Center $477,798 $358,348 $335,765 ($22,584)70.3% Recreation Department $356,110 $267,083 $210,381 ($56,702)59.1% Parks Department $1,663,800 $1,247,850 $1,272,439 $24,589 76.5% Ice Arena $670,489 $502,866 $250,586 ($252,280)37.4% Forestry $650,381 $487,785 $386,299 ($101,487)59.4% Library $1,269,683 $952,262 $909,004 ($43,259)71.6% Subsidies/Appropriation $890,202 $667,652 $822,702 $155,050 92.4% Total $17,222,344 $12,916,758 $11,882,076 ($1,034,682)69.0% EXPENDITURES:FY2019 B Prorated YTD 2019 B 2019YTD A Δ $ (F)/U % Used CIP $13,071,912 $9,803,934 $4,952,589 ($4,851,345)37.9% All Other*$27,399,434 $20,549,575 $13,104,543 ($7,445,032)47.8% Grand Total $57,693,690 $43,270,267 $29,939,208 ($13,331,059)51.9% 4 City Council Priority Project List * Note-Excludes Larson Ice Arena and Bob Sheldon upgrade projects as they are financed with the $7.1M 2019A Series Bond City Council Approved Projects*Cost Indoor Rec 1,500,000$ Food Bank 300,000$ Sinking Fund - CC action taken 350,000$ Interchange - CC action taken 2,000,000$ Priority Funding Available Balance After Approved 1,768,586$ Unapproved Priority Projects Cost Police Dept.5,500,000$ FD Training Tower 150,000$ Parks - Bike Trails (Grant Match)250,000$ Total Unapproved Priority Projects 5,900,000$ Desired Projects (NOT in priority order)Cost Indoor Pool 8,500,000$ Swiftel Convention Ballroom Expansion 7,500,000$ Indoor Tennis 2,500,000$ Sanitary Sewer North bypass 2,000,000$ 11 St Sewer (Innovation Campus)1,000,000$ Swiftel Dressing/Green/Locker 752,750$ Swiftel Kitchen/Storage/Receiving 709,259$ Parks - Parks Maintenance Addition 600,000$ Swiftel - East Parking Lot Paving 320,000$ Streets - 3rd Street Sweeper 265,000$ Streets - Tandem Axle Truck/Sander/etc.225,000$ Parks - Blue Rink Dehumidification (LIA)200,000$ Parks - Pickleball Court 120,000$ Parks - Floor Replacement (LIA)96,000$ PD Training Simulator 95,000$ Streets - Bucket Truck Retro Fit 85,000$ PD K9 Vehicle 65,000$ PD Charger 52,000$ Streets - Side Dump Trailer 50,000$ Swiftel - Outdoor Marquee (22nd Ave)41,500$ Parks - Bridge to East Pond (DNP)30,000$ Total Unapproved Desired Projects 25,206,509$ General Fund Reserves 2018 EOY Unassigned Balance 10,412,201$ 2019 15% General Fund Reserve Balance 2,872,158$ 2019 5% GF Budget Stabilization 957,386$ 2019 Projected Budget Revenue Shortfall 664,071$ City Council Priority Funding Available Balance 5,918,586$ Sales Tax Receipts 2019YoY Vs Budget YoY Vs Budget2018201919-Budget$%$%2018201919-Budget$%$%Jan640,912 605,016 568,217 (35,896) (5.6%)36,799 6.5%Jan70,051 69,782 80,750 (269) (0.4%) (10,968) (13.6%)Feb647,234 727,717 568,217 80,483 12.4% 159,500 28.1%Feb87,188 86,497 80,750 (691) (0.8%)5,747 7.1%Mar533,230 607,776 568,217 74,546 14.0% 39,559 7.0%Mar94,241 71,232 80,750 (23,009) (24.4%) (9,518) (11.8%)Apr503,428 331,414 568,217 (172,015) (34.2%) (236,803) (41.7%)Apr74,644 73,198 80,750 (1,446) (1.9%) (7,552) (9.4%)May566,336 786,569 568,217 220,232 38.9% 218,352 38.4%May87,171 195,014 80,750 107,844 123.7% 114,264 141.5%June406,774 313,127 568,217 (93,647) (23.0%) (255,090) (44.9%)June51,169 42,349 80,750 (8,820) (17.2%) (38,401) (47.6%)July730,263 664,353 568,217 (65,910) (9.0%)96,136 16.9%July87,579 90,745 80,750 3,166 3.6% 9,995 12.4%Aug687,384 776,861 568,217 89,477 13.0% 208,644 36.7%Aug78,649 100,329 80,750 21,680 27.6% 19,579 24.2%Sep602,903 560,344 568,217 (42,559) (7.1%) (7,873) (1.4%)Sep88,035 64,050 80,750 (23,985) (27.2%) (16,700) (20.7%)Oct418,082 568,217 Oct48,403 80,750 Nov598,082 568,217 Nov71,883 80,750 Dec601,892 568,217 Dec79,039 80,750 Total6,936,519 5,373,175 6,818,600 54,712 1.0%259,225 5.1%Total918,052 793,195 969,000 74,468 10.4%66,445 9.1%MA*556,860 578,693 21,833 3.9%MA*77,746 82,902 5,156 6.6%YoY Vs BudgetYoY Vs Budget2018201919-Budget$%$%2018201919-Budget$%$%Jan637,536 605,016 572,290 (32,520) (5.1%)32,726 5.7%Jan16,930 16,668 33,333 (262) (1.5%) (16,665) (50.0%)Feb643,799 731,224 572,290 87,425 13.6% 158,934 27.8%Feb16,460 18,324 33,333 1,864 11.3%(15,009) (45.0%)Mar530,874 612,133 572,290 81,259 15.3% 39,843 7.0%Mar17,300 20,180 33,333 2,880 16.6%(13,153) (39.5%)Apr500,782 333,790 572,290 (166,993) (33.3%) (238,500) (41.7%)Apr19,372 20,890 33,333 1,518 7.8%(12,443) (37.3%)May563,479 792,207 572,290 228,728 40.6% 219,917 38.4%May19,746 19,878 33,333 132 0.7%(13,455) (40.4%)June404,639 315,372 572,290 (89,267) (22.1%) (256,918) (44.9%)June20,460 25,866 33,333 5,406 26.4%(7,467) (22.4%)July726,473 669,116 572,290 (57,357) (7.9%)96,826 16.9%July17,820 30,636 33,333 12,816 71.9%(2,697) (8.1%)Aug683,882 782,430 572,290 98,547 14.4% 210,140 36.7%Aug28,028 28,108 33,333 80 0.3%(5,225) (15.7%)Sep599,776 564,361 572,290 (35,415) (5.9%) (7,929) (1.4%)Sep18,930 25,318 33,333 6,388 33.7%(8,015) (24.0%)Oct415,930 572,290 Oct25,586 33,333 Nov594,994 572,290 Nov28,550 33,333 Dec598,667 572,290 Dec18,608 33,333 Total6,900,830 5,405,647 6,867,480 114,407 2.2% 255,037 5.0%Total247,790 205,868 400,000 30,822 17.6% (94,132) (31.4%)MA*553,980 579,342 25,362 4.6%MA*19,757 22,679 2,922 14.8%YoY Vs Budget2018201919-Budget$%$%Jan1,365,428 1,296,481 1,254,590 (68,947) (5.0%)41,891 3.3%Feb1,394,680 1,563,762 1,254,590 169,081 12.1% 309,172 24.6%Mar1,175,645 1,311,320 1,254,590 135,675 11.5% 56,730 4.5%Apr1,098,227 759,292 1,254,590 (338,936) (30.9%) (495,298) (39.5%)May1,236,732 1,793,668 1,254,590 556,936 45.0% 539,078 43.0%June883,042 696,713 1,254,590 (186,329) (21.1%) (557,877) (44.5%)July1,562,134 1,454,849 1,254,590 (107,285) (6.9%)200,259 16.0%Aug1,477,943 1,687,727 1,254,590 209,784 14.2% 433,137 34.5%Sep1,309,644 1,214,073 1,254,590 (95,571) (7.3%) (40,517) (3.2%)Oct908,001 1,254,590 Nov1,293,509 1,254,590 Dec1,298,206 1,254,590 Total15,003,192 11,777,885 15,055,080 274,409 2.4% 486,575 4.3%2nd Penny (25% and 75%)1st Penny 3rd Penny (Bed,Booze & Lodging) Business Improvements District (Pillow)TOTAL M2 M4 M6 M8 M10 M12 M14 M16 M2015 2016 2017 2018 2019City of Brookings Sales Tax Received (As of Sept '19)1st Penny2nd Penny3rd PennyBIDCity of Brookings City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0442,Version:1 Sustainability Council Report on Plastic Bag Reduction / Elimination. Summary: The Sustainability Council has created and will present a report on the pros and cons of plastic bag bans, the current use of plastic bag ordinances, a list of communities who have banned plastic bags, and alternative tactics to reducing the use of plastic bags which do not require a plastic bag ban. Background: The Brookings Sustainability Council was established by ordinance in March 2011. The purpose of the Sustainability Council is to investigate, propose, educate, communicate, and advocate investment strategies and policies that will improve our future quality of life while still meeting the needs of the present. Areas of emphasis for the Sustainability Council include green community wide practices and future quality of life issues. Given the Sustainability Council’s purpose and areas of emphasis, City Council requested the Sustainability Council to research and report on plastic bag reduction and elimination strategies. June 25, 2019 City Council Minutes excerpt: “A motion was made by Council Member Tilton Byrne, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that the Sustainability Council study what peer communities are doing to reduce or eliminate the use of plastic bags and single-use plastics for City Council review at a future study session. The motion carried by a unanimous vote.” Fiscal Impact: None Recommendation: The Brookings Sustainability Council recommends that the City adopt a multi-faceted bag reduction strategy. Attachments: Memo Report List of Cities with Plastic Bag Bans City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Agenda Memo From:The Brookings Sustainability Council Council Meeting:October 22, 2019 Subject:Plastic Bag Reduction/Elimination Person(s) Responsible: Jennifer McLaughlin, Chair, Brookings Sustainability Council Summary: The Sustainability Council has created and will present a report on the pros and cons of plastic bag bans, the current use of plastic bag ordinances, a list of communities who have banned plastic bags, and alternative tactics to reducing the use of plastic bags which do not require a plastic bag ban. Background: The Brookings Sustainability Council was established by ordinance in March 2011. The purpose of the Sustainability Council is to investigate, propose, educate, communicate, and advocate investment strategies and policies that will improve our future quality of life while still meeting the needs of the present. Areas of emphasis for the Sustainability Council include green community wide practices and future quality of life issues. Given the Sustainability Council’s purpose and areas of emphasis, City Council requested the Sustainability Council to research and report on plastic bag reduction and elimination strategies. June 25, 2019 City Council Minutes excerpt: “A motion was made by Council Member Tilton Byrne, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that the Sustainability Council study what peer communities are doing to reduce or eliminate the use of plastic bags and single-use plastics for City Council review at a future study session. The motion carried by a unanimous vote.” Discussion: The Brookings Sustainability Council will present findings on reducing and/or eliminating the use of plastic bags. While there are both benefits and drawbacks to plastic bag bans, reduction strategies can be employed to reduce the use of the plastic bags in the community. Reduction strategies include spotlighting local business who are utilizing sustainable practices, working with private sector outlets for plastic bag recycling, and continually educating the public on the impact of plastic bag use. An additional alternative to a plastic bag ban would be to consider the use of a disincentive fee for the use of plastic bags. This fee could range from $.05 to $.25 on the use of some or all single use bags. Legal Consideration: There are no legal considerations at this time. Financial Consideration: There are no financial considerations at this time. Options: The City Council has the following options: 1. Utilize the report for information purposes 2. Implement a plastic bag ban or disincentive fee 3. Consider other approaches to reduce plastic bag use in Brookings Recommendation: The Brookings Sustainability Council recommends that the City adopt a multi-faceted bag reduction strategy through: 1. Education to help consumers reduce their use of plastic bags (and reuse/recycle when reduction isn’t feasible). 2. Showcasing local business initiatives in this area to encourage other businesses to take action. 3. Supporting incentives for reducing plastic bag use by both consumers and businesses. 4. Partnering with businesses who offer plastic bag recycling or providing plastic bag drop-off locations. Additionally, the Brookings Sustainability Council recommends that the City adopt policies, strategies and actions that support an overall Reduce-Reuse-Recycle culture with an emphasis on reduction for all single-use plastics and not just plastic bags. The Sustainability Council recommends that the City Council not pursue a plastic bag ban at this time. Action Requested: There is no action requested at this time as the Plastic Bag Reduction/Elimination Report is informational and advisory. Supporting Documentation: 1. Report 2. List of Cities with Plastic Bag Bans Plastic Bag Reduction/Elimination Report I.Concerns with Plastic Bags Reuse This Bag estimates that a plastic bag has a 12-minute lifespan from when it's initially filled with groceries at the grocery store to when it is discarded. Compare this with estimates that those same plastic bags take anywhere from 10 to 1,000 years to decompose depending on what environmental conditions the bag is disposed of in. Quickly, the picture becomes clear that for a few minutes of use, plastic bags weigh heavily on long-term environmental impact. These bags eventually make their way to landfills and into our oceans, adding to the 8 million metric tons of plastic entering the ocean every year. This impact every scale of marine ecosystems, from bottom feeders and microorganisms to whales. II.Current Status of Plastic Bag Bans in the USA There are four states that have passed plastic bag bans. They are California, Hawaii, New York, and Connecticut. The New York plastic bag legislation was signed into law in April of 2019 with implementation in March of 2020. The Connecticut legislation was signed into law in June of 2019 with implementation on July 1, 2021. There are over 350 cities that have passed plastic bag bans. Many of the city bans will go into effect either this year or 2020. The cities are mostly located on the west coast or the east coast. Cities in California have had their bans in place for a few years so they should have some history on how it works. There are a few cities nearby in Colorado and Illinois including Chicago that have plastic bag bans too. The plastic bag bans are either just a simple ban on single-use plastic bags or a ban on single-use plastic bags plus typically a 10 cent tax on paper bags. There are also 13 states that have state statues banning political subdivisions from passing ordinances banning plastic bags. Our neighboring states of Minnesota, Iowa, and North Dakota are among the 13 states stopping cities from writing ordinances banning plastic bags. Suspect the main reason is not to have a myriad of the different ordinances and different rules in each jurisdiction in the same state. South Dakota has no legislation related to the issue of plastic bags. III.Pros and Cons of Plastic Bag Bans The following are some arguments for and against plastic bag bans. Pros of Ban Bags: Ocean Contamination Plastic bags contribute to the garbage that is found in the ocean. The plastic eventually breaks down into microscopic pieces that are consumed by the sea life and works into the food chain. (So if you eat seafood, you might be consuming minute amounts of plastic.) Decomposition Time Plastic bags tend to be slow to degrade, especially in landfills. It is speculated that plastic in a controlled environment such as a landfill could take up to a thousand years to decompose. Difficult to Recycle Plastic bags are difficult to recycle. The USEPA estimates that less than 5% of plastic bags are recycled. (Note: Millennium Recycling in Sioux Falls no longer accepts single-use plastic bags.) Cons of Ban Bags: Environmentally Friendly According to the Environmental Agency of England, reusable cotton bags need to be used 131 times to equal the environmental impact of plastic bags. (This reflects energy, other resources consumed to raise and process the cotton.) Raising cotton can have additional environmental concerns such as fertilizer runoff from cotton fields. Cost and Convenience For retailers, plastic bags are cheap, easy to transport and store, as well as being simple to open and fill. Jobs Plastic bag bans could cost jobs in the plastic industry. Sanitary Conditions If unwashed, reusable bags can become contaminated especially if used to transport food such as uncooked meat. Unintended Consequences According to research done at the University of California–Berkeley, paper bag usage went up more than 31 million kilograms per year in California after several counties starting banning and taxing plastic bags in 2008. Single-use paper bags also require more energy to make, transport, and recycle than plastic. According to the Berkeley study, after bans were enforced in California, thicker kitchen garbage bags and large trash bags purchases rose by as much as 67 percent. (“The Pros and Cons of Banning Plastic Bags: Critics Weigh In” Jared Gnam, Special to the Epoch Times, February 22, 2018 IV.Plastic Bag Ordinances – Summary of Ordinances Currently in Place Plastic bag ban ordinances can vary greatly depending on what the intent of the elected leaders of the various cities were trying to achieve. Plastic bag ban ordinances can include several elements such as the size of the store (exempting smaller retailers), thickness of the plastic, taxes on paper bags, implementation date etc. As a result, the ordinances range from fairly simple to fairly complex. Size of Store Some cities are targeting large retailers and trying to exempt smaller businesses. As a result some ordinances use 20,000 square feet as a cut off. Large retailers subject to the ban and smaller businesses would be exempt. Thickness of Plastic Some cities are targeting certain types of plastic bags. Therefore, some ordinances refer to the mils of thickness of the plastic bag. Ranges can be from 2.25 mils to 12 mils. Some stores such as clothing stores use a thicker, better quality bag than many big box retailers. Taxes Some cities and states are targeting all bags and as a result put a 10 cent tax on paper bags as well as banning single-use plastic bags. Implementation Date Most ordinances set an implementation date that is one to two years later than the date the ordinance is passed. This is to give the retailers time to react to the ban. Miscellaneous Exemptions could be given to entities that are exempt from sales tax such as churches, food distribution centers, Goodwill, government entities, etc. V.Cities around the USA that have banned plastic bags There is a popular and growing movement to ban or heavily tax single-use plastic bags across the United States and globally. Here, we've collected the 349 known cities, counties, and states to have, in some way, banned or taxed plastic bag use. Currently, only Hawaii and California have statewide plastic bag bans, with several other cities having either mandatory recycling programs, taxes on plastic bag use, etc. Source: Wiki Commons NOTE: When looking through the list of cities that have partially or wholly banned plastic bags, it's important to note this is an active area of legislation. Local governments across the United States have plans to vote on a ban in the coming years. If you'd like to use a great interactive map of each state, visit Bag The Ban.https://www.bagtheban.com/ **See separate document with list of cities that have banned plastic bags. VI.Considerations Other Than a Ban or Fee program: Encouraging and Incentivizing Reduce-Reuse-Recycle There are businesses in Brookings who are already taking on sustainability initiatives and making efforts forward in a Reduce/Reuse/Recycle culture with an emphasis on Reduction. An opportunity may be to put the spotlight on those businesses to encourage more sustainable practices. For example, the Sustainability Council is aware that Cottonwood Coffee recently made a change in their business practices in that they no longer put several of their to-go items in plastic “to-go containers” (which were often also put into a plastic bag!). Their breakfast sandwiches and burritos are wrapped in tinfoil as before but are now put into small paper “lunch-bags” and handed to the customer. The Brookings Sustainability Council would like to promote sustainable business practices and changes such as the one undertaken by Cottonwood Coffee. Additionally, the City of Brookings currently does not have an outlet for plastic bag recycling. As such, it is not feasible to provide plastic bag recycling containers at this time. However, the Sustainability Council is making contact with private sector businesses in the community who currently offer plastic bag recycling opportunities. The Sustainability Council is working to identify strategic ways to support businesses who offer plastic bag recycling through promotion, branding, and education. VII.Notes to consider should the City proceed with a Plastic Bag Ban or other Plastic Bag program: 1) Although it is not what the Sustainability Council recommends, the City could implement a plastic bag ban in which case, we would recommend the following considerations: a. Like with any cultural change effort, education will be vital to a successful program should the City proceed with a Plastic Bag Ban. Several of our peer communities have done educational campaigns at events and speaking engagements. Social media, presentations, mailers, and booths have been used in peer communities. Using statistics specific to Brookings has the potential to make the campaign more effective. See examples from Moscow, Idaho. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxUtCFVmESwIODNZeWx0cjBjcjVZMWxkNmV0OFp WQ3BuV0hv and https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxUtCFVmESwIekJOSHd5ZVM0Q3hzd1RJMjhXNXZ5 N19mQktR b. The Brookings Sustainability Council would recommend the City carefully investigate the legal aspects of a ban, especially as it pertains to any conflicts with current or pending state legislation. 2) While it is also not what the Sustainability Council would recommend, the City could consider implementing a “disincentive” fee rather than a ban. If so, the Sustainability Council would recommend the City consider the following: a. Multiple cities have successfully implemented a fee on some or all (paper & plastic) single use bags. These fees range in price from $0.05 - $0.25. According to Surfrider, having a fee is an effective way to change behavior. In Washington D.C. a $0.05 fee on plastic bags has reduced their plastic bag usage by 60%. In a survey done after the fee was initiated, it stated that “53% of residents and 63% of businesses supporting the law outright. Only 16% of residents and 8% of businesses said they were bothered by the law, while the rest said they had no feelings about the bag law either way.” Another option in the fee area, would be to charge retailers who distribute a large amount of plastic bags an extra fee on their regular trash & recycling hauling fee. (https://ddoe.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ddoe/publication/attachments/DDOE% 202013%20Bag%20Law%20Survey%20Final%20Report%20(2).pdf) (Surfrider: http://publicfiles.surfrider.org/Plastics/Plastic_Bag_Law_Activist_Toolkit_2019.pdf) b. A few things to note with a bag fee: i. Should include a fee on both paper and plastic as they both have environmental impacts. We would need to decide what thickness of plastic bag would be included in the fee. ii. Have programs to ensure low income community members receive the reusable bags they need or are exempt from the fee 1. Some communities have handed reusable bags out for free. Other communities have allowed community members using SNAP/WIC no to bypass the fee. iii. Need to decide where that fee money goes and what it is used for 1. This varies from city to city, but options include a general fund, environmental fund, or monies staying with the retailer. iv. How would single use bags be handled in situations such as HyVee Aisle Online? Plastic bag bans across the United States Wiki Commons City / County State Ban DEL MAR CA City-wide ban on plastics bags and a 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags ALAMEDA COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags in all stores, and in all restaurants ST. HELENA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and a 10-cent fee on paper bags OCEANSIDE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and ten-cent fee on paper bags SAN DIEGO CA City-wide ban on single-use plastic bags and ten-cent fee on paper bags DANVILLE CA Town-wide ban on plastic bags SACRAMENTO COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags YOUNTVILLE CA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags CATHEDRAL CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags HERMOSA BEACH CA City-wide ban on plastic and 10-cent fee on paper AMERICAN CANYON CA City-wide ban on plastic bags MILPITAS CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags SEASIDE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags LAFAYETTE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags MANHATTAN BEACH CA Ban on plastic bags FAIRFAX CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags PACIFICA CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee SACRAMENTO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee for paper bags MARINA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags ENCINITAS CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags HERCULES CA Ban on plastic and ten cent fee on recycled and reusable paper bags PACIFIC GROVE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee for allowable carryout bags PLEASANT HILL CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee NEVADA CITY CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee MOUNTAIN VIEW CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee MONROVIA CA Ban on plastic bags KING CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags MARTINEZ CA Ban on plastic bags CHICO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee for paper bags GRASS VALLEY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags CALISTOGA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags INDIO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags WALNUT CREEK CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags BELVEDERE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on reusable bags SOUTH PASADENA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags ARCATA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags PALM SPRINGS CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags LOS ALAMOS CA Ban on plastic bags SANTA BARBARA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 5-cent fee on paper bags MONTEREY (COUNTY)CA County-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags SAN RAFAEL CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags NOVATO CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee PETALUMA CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags SANTA ROSA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags SALINAS CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee ROHNERT PARK CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags COTATI CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags CLOVERDALE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags HEALDSBURGH CA Ban on plastic and ten cent fee on paper SAUSALITO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SEBASTOPOL CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SONOMA CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SONOMA COUNTY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags WINDSOR CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags DAVIS CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags LOS ANGELES CITY CA Ban on plastic bags and ten-cent fee on paper bags TRUCKEE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags ORCUTT CA Ban on plastic bags and paper bag tax LOS GATOS CA Plastic bag ban CAMPBELL CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a small fee on paper and reusable bags PITTSBURG CA Ban on plastic bags and tax on paper bags RICHMOND CA Ban on plastic bags and 5-cent paper bag tax EL CERRITO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags SAN PABLO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 5-cent tax on plastic or reusable bags CULVER CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SAN JOSE CA City-wide ban on plastic with a 10-cent fee on paper bags MILL VALLEY CA Ban on plastic bags EAST PALO ALTO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags REDWOOD CITY (IN SAN MATEO COUNTY)CA Ban on plastic bags CUPERTINO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags LOS ALTOS CA Plastic bag ban and 25 cent fee on paper bags PALO ALTO CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags SAN CARLOS CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 5-cent fee on paper bags HALF MOON BAY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SAN BRUNO CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags PORTOLA VALLEY CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee PACIFICA CA Ban on plastic bags and 25-cent tax on paper bags MORGAN HILL CITY CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee MENLO PARK CA Ban on plastic bags BELMONT CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 25-cent fee on paper bags FOSTER CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags DALY CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags COLMA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SAN MATEO CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags SAN MATEO COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags WOODSIDE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags CARPINTERIA CA City-wide ban on plastic and paper bags SANTA CRUZ CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags DANA POINT CA City-wide ban on plastic bags CAPITOLA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 25-cent tax on paper bags BURLINGAME CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags BRISBANE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SUNNYVALE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags WEST HOLLYWOOD CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags CARMEL BY THE SEA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags MENDOCINO COUNTY CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags UKIAH COUNTY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags PLEASANTON CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags PIEDMONT CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags OAKLAND CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags NEWARK CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags MONTEREY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 25-cent paper bag fee ALBANY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags LIVERMORE CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags BERKLEY COUNTY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags HAYWARD CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags GLENDALE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags FREMONT CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on reusable and paper bags EMERYVILLE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on reusable and paper bags DUBLIN CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on reusable and paper bags CORVALLIS CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 5-cent fee on paper bags LAGUNA BEACH CA Ban on plastic bags and a ten cent fee on paper bags SAN LEANDRO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags UNION CITY CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags FORT BRAGG CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags ARROYO GRANDE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper PISMO BEACH CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags PASO ROBLES CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee MORRO BAY CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags ATASCADERO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags GROVER BEACH CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags WATSONVILLE CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-25 cent fee on paper bags MILLBRAE CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags SOLANA BEACH CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags PASADENA CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags OJAI CA Ban on plastic bags and 10-cent paper bag fee SAN LUIS OBISPO CA City-wide ban with a 10-cent fee on paper bags SAN FRANCISCO CA City-wide ban on plastic bags MARIN COUNTY CA Ban on plastic bags LOS ANGELES COUNTY CA Ban on plastic bags and ten cent fee for paper bags SANTA CLARA COUNTY CA County-wide ban on plastic bags with a 15 cent fee on paper bags SANTA MONICA CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags LONG BEACH CA Ban on plastic bags and ten cent fee on paper bags CALABASAS CA City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent fee on paper bags MALIBU CA Ban on plastic bags CALIFORNIA (STATEWIDE)CA Statewide ban on single-use plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and reusable bags BISBEE AZ City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 5-cent tax on paper bags ANCHORAGE AK City-wide ban on plastic bags, 10-50-cent tax for paper bags UNALASKA AK City-wide ban on plastic bags PALMER AK City-wide ban on plastic bags WASILLA AK City-wide ban on plastic bags CORDOVA AK City-wide ban on plastic bags HOOPER BAY AK City-wide ban on plastic bags BETHEL AK City-wide ban on plastic bags CRESTED BUTTE CO City-wide ban on plastic bags AVON CO Town-wide ban on plastic bags, 10-cent tax on paper bags NEDERLAND CO City-wide 10-cent fee on paper and plastic bags BRECKENRIDGE CO City-wide 10-percent tax on plastic bags BOULDER CO 10-cent fee on plastic bags ASPEN CO City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 20-cent fee on paper bags CARBONDALE CO City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 20-cent tax on paper bags TELLURIDE CO City-wide ban on plastic bags with a 10-cent tax on paper bags GREENWICH CT City-wide ban on plastic bags (3 year sunset) WESTPORT CT Westport, CT implemented a ban on plastic bags for all retailers in the city WASHINGTON DC City-wide 5-cent tax on plastic and paper bags CORAL GABLES FL City-wide ban on plastic bags OAHU HI County-wide ban on plastic bags, 15-cent tax on reusable plastic bags, and ban on all plastic bags by 2020 OAHU HI Ban on plastic bags HAWAII COUNTY HI County-wide ban on plastic bags HONOLULU HI City-wide ban on plastic bags MAUI COUNTY HI County-wide ban on plastic bags KAUAI COUNTY HI County-wide ban on plastic bags MARSHALL COUNTY IA County-wide ban on plastic bags OAK PARK IL City-wide 10-cent tax for retailers over 5,000 square feet CHICAGO IL City-wide 7-cent tax on plastic and paper bags EVANSTON IL City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 225ml thick DARTMOUTH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WILMINGTON MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags HAVERHILL MA City-wide ban on plastic bags for businesses with 8,000 square feet or more ANDOVER MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags LOWELL MA City-wide ban on plastic bags (retail establishments 3,000 sq ft or greater) DANVERS MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WESTFORD MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags GLOUCESTER MA City-wide ban on plastic bags HOPKINTON MA Town-wide plastic bag ban BELMONT MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags BOSTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags, Five-cent tax on paper, reusable and compostable bags COHASSET MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WINCHESTER MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags MARSHFIELD MA Town-wide plastic bag ban WESTBOROUGH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags SWAMPSCOTT MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags TOPSFIELD MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WAYLAND MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WAKEFIELD MA City-wide ban on plastic bags MELROSE MA City-wide ban on plastic bags (businesses over 8,000 sq ft) SOUTH HADLEY MA City-wide ban on plastic bags SUDBURY MA City-wide ban on plastic bags DALTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 40 mils YARMOUTH MA City-wide ban on plastic bags ARLINGTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags STOCKBRIDGE MA City-wide ban on plastic bags BOURNE MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags OAK BLUFFS MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags FRAMINGHAM MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags EDGARTOWN MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and fee on paper and reusable bags ATHOL MA City-wide ban on plastic bags SANDWICH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags IPSWICH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and fee on paper bags DENNIS MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags BEDFORD MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags PLYMOUTH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags NATICK MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WATERTOWN MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags SHREWSBURY MA City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 40 mils thick LENOX MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags LEE MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and tax on paper bags ADAMS MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags AMHERST MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags CHILMARK MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and fee on paper and reusable bags AQUINNAH MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WEST TISBURY MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and fee on paper and reusable bags TISBURY MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags and fee on paper and reusable bags SALEM MA City-wide ban on plastic bags WELLESLY MA City-wide ban on plastic bags BARNSTABLE MA City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 3 mils thick SOMERVILLE MA City-wide ban on plastic bags FALMOUTH MA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags HAMILTON MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags HARWICH MA City-wide ban on plastic bags CAMBRIDGE MA City-wide ban on single-use plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper and composed plastic bags TRURO MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags BRIDGEWATER MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags NORTHAMPTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags CONCORD MA City-wide ban on plastic bags CHATHAM MA City-wide ban on single-use plastic bags WELLFLEET MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags WILLIAMSTOWN MA Town-wide ban on plastic bags NEWTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags MARBLEHEAD MA City-wide ban on plastic bags PROVINCETOWN MA City-wide ban on plastic bags NEWBURYPORT MA City-wide ban on plastic bags GREAT BARRINGTON MA City-wide ban on plastic bags MANCHESTER MA City-wide ban on plastic bags BROOKLINE MA City-wide ban on plastic bags HARFORD MD County-wide ban on plastic yard waste bags ABERDEEN MD City-wide ban on plastic yard waste bags TAKOMA PARK MD City-wide ban on plastic bags MONTGOMERY COUNTY MD Five-cent charge on each paper or plastic carryout bag provided by retail establishments CHESTERTOWN MD Chestertown, MD implemented a ban on plastic bags for all retailers ROCKLAND ME City-wide ban on plastic bags MANCHESTER ME Town-wide ban on plastic bags BLUE HILL ME Town-wide plastic bag ban BATH ME City-wide ban on plastic bags, and a five-cent tax on paper bags (increasing to 10-cents and 15-cents in 2019 and 2020) BELFAST ME City-wide ban on plastic bags CAPE ELIZABETH ME Town-wide five-cent tax on plastic bags BRUNSWICK ME Town-wide ban on plastic bags TOPSHAM ME Town-wide 5-cent fee on plastic bags SACO ME City-wide ban on plastic bags FREEPORT ME Town-wide ban on plastic bags and five-cent fee on paper bags KENNEBUNK ME Town-wide ban on plastic bags FALMOUTH ME City-wide 5-cent fee on plastic and paper bags YORK ME Town-wide ban on plastic bags SOUTH PORTLAND ME City-wide 5-cent fee on plastic and paper bags PORTLAND ME City-wide 5-cent fee on plastic and paper bags WASHTENAW COUNTY MI County-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on reusable bags HYDE COUNTY NC County-wide ban on plastic bags DARE COUNTY NC County-wide ban on plastic bags CURRITUCK COUNTY NC County-wide ban on plastic bags JERSEY CITY NJ City-wide ban on plastic bags BELMAR NJ Borough-wide ban on plastic bags BRIGANTINE BEACH NJ City-wide ban on plastic bags HOBOKEN NJ City-wide ban on plastic bags, fee on paper and reusable bags (up to 25-cents); low-income customers exempt BRADLEY BEACH NJ Borough-wide ban on plastic bags STAFFORD TOWNSHIP NJ Town-wide ban on plastic bags ATLANTIC COUNTY NJ County-wide ban on plastic bags and straws within parks TEANECK NJ 5-cent tax on plastic bags MONMOUTH BEACH NJ Borough-wide ban on plastic bags LONG BEACH NJ Town-wide ban on plastic bags POINT PLEASANT BEACH NJ Borough-wide ban on plastic bags LONGPORT NJ 10-cent fee on paper and plastic bags SILVER CITY NM City-wide ban on plastic bags SANTA FE NM City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper bags BEDFORD NY Town-wide 10-cent fee on plastic and paper bags LEWISBORO NY Town-wide ban on plastic bags,15-cent fee on paper bags SEA CLIFF NY Village-wide minimum 5-cent tax on plastic bags SUFFOLK COUNTY NY County-wide five-cent fee on paper and plastic bags LONG BEACH NY City-wide five-cent fee on plastic bags NEW CASTLE NY City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags NEW YORK CITY NY City-wide 5-cent fee on plastic bags PATCHOGUE VILLAGE NY City-wide ban on plastic bags SAG HARBOR NY Village-wide ban on plastic bags SOUTHAMPTON NY City-wide ban on plastic bags NEW PALTZ VILLAGE NY Village-wide ban on plastic bags HASTINGS ON HUDSON NY City-wide ban on plastic bags LARCHMONT NY City-wide ban on plastic bags MAMARONECK NY Village-wide ban on plastic bags RYE NY City-wide ban on plastic bags EAST HAMPTON NY City-wide ban on plastic bags NEW YORK (STATEWIDE)NY Proposal for State-wide ban on plastic bags w/Amendments MILWAUKIE OR City-wide ban on plastic bags MANZANITA OR City-wide ban on plastic bags MCMINNVILLE OR City-wide ban on plastic bags HOOD RIVER OR City-wide ban on plastic bags FOREST GROVE OR City-wide ban on plastic bags ASHLAND OR City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent fee on paper bags EUGENE OR City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags CORVALLIS OR City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags PORTLAND OR City-wide ban on plastic bags PROVIDENCE RI City-wide ban on plastic bags and 10-cent tax on paper and reusable bags NORTH KINGSTOWN RI Town-wide ban on plastic bags JAMESTOWN RI City-wide ban on plastic bags NEW SHOREHAM RI Town-wide ban on plastic bags NEWPORT RI City-wide ban on plastic bags MIDDLETOWN RI City-wide ban on plastic bags BARRINGTON RI City-wide ban on plastic bags MOUNT PLEASANT SC City-wide ban on plastic bags BEAUFORT COUNTY SC County-wide ban on plastic bags SURFSIDE BEACH SC City-wide ban on plastic bags FOLLY BEACH SC City-wide ban on plastic bags ISLE OF PALMS SC City-wide ban on plastic bags BROWNSVILLE TX City-wide ban of plastic bags EAGLE PASS TX City-wide ban on plastic bags PORT ARANSAS TX City-wide ban on plastic bags suspended LAREDO TX City-wide plastic bag ban KERMIT TX Plastic bag ban and 10-cent tax on paper bags SUNSET VALLEY TX City-wide plastic bag ban FREER TX City-wide plastic bag ban AUSTIN TX The ordinance include specific carryout bag standards, exemptions and signage requirements LAGUNA VISTA TX Plastic bag ban at all retailers SOUTH PADRE ISLAND TX City-wide plastic bag ban FORT STOCKTON TX A bag ban ordinance with an exception for plastic bags that are labeled 100% recyclable MOAB UT City-wide ban on plastic bags PARK CITY UT City-wide ban on plastic bags in stores larger than 12,000 sq ft PARK CITY UT City-wide ban on plastic bags in stores larger than 12,000 sq ft BRATTLEBORO VT Town-wide ban on plastic bags KENMORE WA City-wide ban on plastic bags, 5-cent fee on paper bags LA CONNER WA Town-wide ban on plastic bags PORT ANGELES WA City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 225 mm, 5-cent tax on all bags TACOMA WA City-wide ban on plastic bags less than 225 mils thick FRIDAY HARBOR WA Town-wide ban on plastic bags SAN JUAN COUNTY WA County-wide ban on plastic bags TUMWATER WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags THURSTON COUNTY WA County-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags OLYMPIA WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags LACEY WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags MERCER ISLAND WA City-wide ban on plastic bags SHORELINE WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags ISSAQUAH WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags MUKILTEO WA City-wide ban on plastic bags PORT TOWNSEND WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags BAINBRIDGE ISLAND WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags BELLINGHAM WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags SEATTLE WA City-wide ban on plastic bags and 5-cent fee on paper bags EDMONDS WA City-wide ban on plastic bags What you'll notice is that there are quite a few states that are missing from the list above. Since plastic bag bans have been pushed by local governments, they may not be a top priority for certain regions. However, one thing is clear, the list will continue to grow. “US To Ban Plastic Bags, Will Your City Be Next?” Trevor Nace, Senior Contributor, Forbes, Sept. 20, 2018 City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 19-087,Version:1 Action on Resolution 19-087, a Resolution Awarding Bids on Edgebrook Golf Cart Lease. Summary: This resolution will award the Edgebrook Golf Cart Lease. Background: The Brookings Park & Recreation office held a bid letting on Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 1:30 pm at the City & County Government Center and the following bids were received: NB Golf Cars 2020 Club Car-Tempo Electric -$31,690.26/year x 5 years = $158,451.30 2020 Club Car-Precedent Electric -$30,781.80/year x 5 years = $153,909.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $37.00/day Miller & Sons Golf Cars 2020 EZ GO TXT 48V -$33,643.00/year x 5 years = $168,215.00 2020 EZ GO RXV Elite -$41,167.00/year x 5 years = $205,835.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $30.00/day The carts included in the bid package are new 2020 model electric carts and meet the bid specifications. Fiscal Impact: City budget is $33,800. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the NB Golf Cars bid of $158,431.30 and $37 per day/per cart. Memo Resolution City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Agenda Memo From: Dusty Rodiek, Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Director Council Meeting: November 12, 2019 Subject: Action on Resolution 19-087, A Resolution Awarding Bids on EdgeBrook Golf Cart Lease Person(s) Responsible: Dusty Rodiek, Parks, Recreation, Forestry Director Summary: This resolution will award the 5-year term EdgeBrook Golf Cart lease. Two competitive bids were received. Staff recommends the NB Golf Cars bid for $31,690 a year which is under budget. The term of the agreement is for five years. Background: The EdgeBrook Golf Course offers golf carts for rent to daily customers and as a part of many membership packages. The lease for the carts is set to expire. Lease provides carts for users without a major capital investment. The bids are competitively sought and two were received. Discussion: The City opened bids on Tuesday, November 5, 2019 with two firms providing acceptable proposals: NB Golf Cars 2020 Club Car-Tempo Electric -$31,690.26/year x 5 years = $158,451.30 2020 Club Car-Precedent Electric - $30,781.80/year x 5 years = $153,909.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $37.00/day Miller & Sons Golf Cars 2020 EZ GO TXT 48V -$33,643.00/year x 5 years = $168,215.00 2020 EZ GO RXV Elite -$41,167.00/year x 5 years = $205,835.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $30.00/day The Club Car Tempo model and both EZ GO models have the ability to be upgraded to accept GPS technology should this application become desired in the future. These carts have the future ability of adapted GPS systems that can improve the player experience, improve course flow by allowing management to track speed of play, provide added security from cart theft and provide weather safety alerts. The existing bid does not contain gps but is a future add on should the expense be offset by increased revenues. Legal Consideration: None. Financial Consideration: The City budgeted $33,800/year for the lease of golf carts. Options: The City Council has the following options: 1. Approve as presented 2. Deny Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the bid from NB Golf Cars for the Club Car Tempo model. Action Requested: Approve the resolution to award the EdgeBrook Golf Cart lease. Supporting Documentation: 1. Resolution Resolution 19-087 Resolution Awarding EdgeBrook Golf Course Golf Cart 5-Year Lease Whereas, the City of Brookings opened bids for EdgeBrook Golf Course Golf Cart 5- Year Lease on Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 1:30 pm at Brookings City & County Government Center; and Whereas, the City of Brookings has received the following bids: NB Golf Cars 2020 Club Car-Tempo Electric -$31,690.26/year x 5 years = $158,451.30 2020 Club Car-Precedent Electric - $30,781.80/year x 5 years = $153,909.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $37.00/day Miller & Sons Golf Cars 2020 EZ GO TXT 48V -$33,643.00/year x 5 years = $168,215.00 2020 EZ GO RXV Elite -$41,167.00/year x 5 years = $205,835.00 Tournament Fleet Rate - $30.00/day Now Therefore, Be It Resolved the bid from NB Golf Cars for the Club Car Tempo Electric model be accepted. Passed and approved this 12th day of November, 2019. CITY OF BROOKINGS ________________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Bonnie Foster, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0468,Version:1 Action on a Legal Services Agreement between the City of Brookings and Steven J. Britzman, Attorney at Law for a one year contract (01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020). Summary: Attached is a contract for City Attorney services for the City of Brookings with Mr. Steve Britzman. The term is for one year. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Memo Contract - Marked Contract - Clean 2019 Contract City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Work Session Memo From:Paul M. Briseno, City Manager Council Work Session:November 12, 2019 Subject:City Attorney Legal Services Agreement Renewal Person(s) Responsible: Paul M. Briseno, City Manager Summary: Annually, the City Council approves the legal services agreement with City Attorney Steve Britzman. The attached agreement is consistent with the 2019 agreement. The only substantial change is the fee, which has a proposed increase of 2.25%. Background: The City Attorney is one of three positions appointed by the City Council as outlined in the City Charter. The City Attorney services are contracted and outlined within an annual agreement. The agreement outlines the performance of legal service, conflicts of interest, reimbursement for services and services noted on pages three (3) and four (4) items 1 – 15. Discussion: The proposed 2020 agreement reflects the same parameters as the 2019 agreement; however, the fee is increased 2.25%, which is consistent with the projected pay adjustment. The 2020 annual contact is $97,162.44 and hourly rate of $175 for litigation or substantial recodification. Additionally, $4,125 is budgeted for membership and registration. Legal Consideration: There are no legal considerations at this time. Financial Consideration: The 2020 budget contains the proposed increase of 2.25%. Options: The City Council has the following options: 1. Approve as presented 2. Approve with Council changes 3. Deny 4. Refer to a work session Staff Recommendation: The City Attorney and City Manager discussed and recommend the proposed agreement. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2020 Contract – Marked 2. 2020 Contract – Clean Legal Services Agreement _______________ THE CITY OF BROOKINGS AND STEVEN J. BRITZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW agree that the City of Brookings has appointed Steven J. Britzman to serve as City Attorney for a one (1) year period, commencing January 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2020, unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties, in writing. The City of Brookings and Steven J. Britzman desire to set forth the terms of their Agreement concerning the provision of legal services by Steven J. Britzman as City Attorney as follows: 1. Performance of Legal Services Steven J. Britzman will perform all legal services as provided in the "Scope of Services for City Attorney for City of Brookings" (the "Scope of Services"). A copy of the Scope of Services for City Attorney is attached hereto. Steven J. Britzman will perform all legal services which shall include representing the City in Magistrate Court in the enforcement of City Ordinances. 2. Insurance Coverage Steven J. Britzman will maintain Attorneys Professional Liability coverage in the amount of One (1) million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and One (1) million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate during the term of this agreement. Steven J. Britzman will be responsible to pay any deductible amount under the foregoing coverage. 3. Conflicts of Interest The parties to this Agreement understand that actual or perceived conflicts of interest are defined in great detail in the Rules of Professional Responsibility which govern attorneys and which are a part of the statutes of South Dakota. Accordingly, Steven J. Britzman will follow the Rules of Professional Responsibility, immediately disclose to the City Council and City Manager any conflict or the appearance of a potential conflict, and resolve the issue to the satisfaction of the City of Brookings and the client. 4. Compensation for Legal Services Steven J. Britzman agrees to provide all of the legal services provided in the Scope of Services, for a monthly sum from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 of Eight Thousand Ninety-six and 87/100 ($8,096.87) Dollars, payable on the last day of the month. The hourly rate for other legal services, including those set forth in Item 15 of the Scope of Services is $175.00 during the term of this Agreement. The legal services provided by Steven J. Britzman will be performed as an independent contractor and Steven J. Britzman shall therefore pay all payroll and business expenses incurred in providing legal services to the City. 2 5. Expense Reimbursements, Meetings and Conferences In addition to the compensation for legal services during each year of this Agreement, the City will provide Three Thousand Dollars ($3,500.00) per year for membership in the International Municipal Attorneys Association (IMLA) (currently $625.00 per year) and for Conference registration, travel and lodging for the Annual Meeting of the International Municipal Lawyers Association which includes approximately nineteen hours of continuing legal education. The City Attorney will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses when required to travel outside the City of Brookings to other meetings or to perform legal services, provided such travel is approved by the City Manager in advance of travel. 6. Legal Services not within the Scope of Services Steven J. Britzman shall first obtain approval of the City to perform any legal services excluded from the Scope of Services, however Steven J. Britzman and the City agree that it is appropriate for the City Attorney to be responsive to residents of the city, the media, other municipal attorneys, the municipal league and other public officials where communication or an appropriate measure of assistance is in the best interest of the City. Dated this ____day of November, 2019. STEVEN J. BRITZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW Steven J. Britzman Dated this ____day of November, 2019. CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA Paul M. Briseno, City Manager ATTEST: _______________________________ Bonnie Foster, City Clerk SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CITY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF BROOKINGS THE CITY ATTORNEY SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: 1. The City Attorney will attend all City Council meetings as the legal advisor for 3 the Brookings City Council, unless the absence is due to vacation or illness or the subject matter does not require the assistance of counsel. 2. Provide all necessary legal consultation services, including oral and written opinions and research as requested by the Brookings City Council and the City Manager. 3. Provide legal assistance to the City’s Boards and Commissions, except the Utility Board and Hospital Board, as requested by the City Manager and City Council. 4. Provide legal representation to the City in litigation initiated against the City and by the City in circumstances where the City is not represented by legal counsel assigned by its insurance company. Legal representation in litigation must be authorized in each instance by the City Council and compensation will be in addition to the monthly compensation as provided in Section 15. 5. Assist in the preparation and review of all contract agreements, resolutions, ordinances and other legal documents considered, adopted or endorsed by the City. 6. To maintain a working knowledge of Municipal Law on both the State and Federal level. 7. Provide legal representation for the City before administrative bodies upon special request by the City Council. 8. As requested, review all claims made against the City. 9. Confer with colleagues who specialize in areas of law to establish and verify a basis for legal proceedings; serve as a liaison between outside legal counsel and City Officials on specialized legal issues. 4 10. Prepare a monthly written report to the City Manager of legal services performed which includes a description of the service and the time required to perform the service. 11. Assist the City Clerk and the private sector firm in Ordinance Codification. 12. The City Attorney will be an advisor to the labor negotiating staff and will review labor contracts as required or requested. 13. Maintain professional awareness of current literature and changes in law and attend continuing legal education to ensure the most efficient, cost- effective, and accurate operation of the City Attorney’s Office. 14. Review proposed state legislation affecting the City and prepare or supervise the preparation of state legislation relating to municipal and city government matters as directed by the City Manager or City Council. Consult with City Council, the City Manager and department heads in regard to such legislation and testify before legislative boards as requested. 15. The City Attorney’s basic fee does not include the following services: a. Litigation b. Recodification of substantially all of the City Ordinances. All services with the exception of litigation and recodification of the City Ordinances will be compensated pursuant to the City Attorney’s basic fee. Fees for services in a. and b. above will be as negotiated and agreed upon by the parties. Legal Services Agreement _______________ THE CITY OF BROOKINGS AND STEVEN J. BRITZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW agree that the City of Brookings has appointed Steven J. Britzman to serve as City Attorney for a one (1) year period, commencing January 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2020, unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties, in writing. The City of Brookings and Steven J. Britzman desire to set forth the terms of their Agreement concerning the provision of legal services by Steven J. Britzman as City Attorney as follows: 1. Performance of Legal Services Steven J. Britzman will perform all legal services as provided in the "Scope of Services for City Attorney for City of Brookings" (the "Scope of Services"). A copy of the Scope of Services for City Attorney is attached hereto. Steven J. Britzman will perform all legal services which shall include representing the City in Magistrate Court in the enforcement of City Ordinances. 2. Insurance Coverage Steven J. Britzman will maintain Attorneys Professional Liability coverage in the amount of One (1) million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and One (1) million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate during the term of this agreement. Steven J. Britzman will be responsible to pay any deductible amount under the foregoing coverage. 3. Conflicts of Interest The parties to this Agreement understand that actual or perceived conflicts of interest are defined in great detail in the Rules of Professional Responsibility which govern attorneys and which are a part of the statutes of South Dakota. Accordingly, Steven J. Britzman will follow the Rules of Professional Responsibility, immediately disclose to the City Council and City Manager any conflict or the appearance of a potential conflict, and resolve the issue to the satisfaction of the City of Brookings and the client. 4. Compensation for Legal Services Steven J. Britzman agrees to provide all of the legal services provided in the Scope of Services, for a monthly sum from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 of eight thousand ninety-six and 87/100 ($8,096.87) Dollars, payable on the last day of the month. The hourly rate for other legal services, including those set forth in Item 15 of the Scope of Services is $175.00 during the term of this Agreement. The legal services provided by Steven J. Britzman will be performed as an independent contractor and Steven J. Britzman shall therefore pay all payroll and business expenses incurred in providing legal services to the City. 2 5. Expense Reimbursements, Meetings and Conferences In addition to the compensation for legal services during each year of this Agreement, the City will provide Three Thousand Dollars ($3,500.00) per year for membership in the International Municipal Attorneys Association (IMLA) (currently $625.00 per year) and for Conference registration, travel and lodging for the Annual Meeting of the International Municipal Lawyers Association which includes approximately nineteen hours of continuing legal education. The City Attorney will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses when required to travel outside the City of Brookings to other meetings or to perform legal services, provided such travel is approved by the City Manager in advance of travel. 6. Legal Services not within the Scope of Services Steven J. Britzman shall first obtain approval of the City to perform any legal services excluded from the Scope of Services, however Steven J. Britzman and the City agree that it is appropriate for the City Attorney to be responsive to residents of the city, the media, other municipal attorneys, the municipal league and other public officials where communication or an appropriate measure of assistance is in the best interest of the City. Dated this ____day of November, 2019. STEVEN J. BRITZMAN,ATTORNEY AT LAW Steven J. Britzman Dated this ____day of November, 2019. CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA Paul M. Briseno, City Manager ATTEST: _______________________________ Bonnie Foster, City Clerk 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CITY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF BROOKINGS THE CITY ATTORNEY SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: 1. The City Attorney will attend all City Council meetings as the legal advisor for the Brookings City Council, unless the absence is due to vacation or illness or the subject matter does not require the assistance of counsel. 2. Provide all necessary legal consultation services, including oral and written opinions and research as requested by the Brookings City Council and the City Manager. 3. Provide legal assistance to the City’s Boards and Commissions, except the Utility Board and Hospital Board, as requested by the City Manager and City Council. 4. Provide legal representation to the City in litigation initiated against the City and by the City in circumstances where the City is not represented by legal counsel assigned by its insurance company. Legal representation in litigation must be authorized in each instance by the City Council and compensation will be in addition to the monthly compensation as provided in Section 15. 5. Assist in the preparation and review of all contract agreements, resolutions, ordinances and other legal documents considered, adopted or endorsed by the City. 6. To maintain a working knowledge of Municipal Law on both the State and Federal level. 7. Provide legal representation for the City before administrative bodies upon special request by the City Council. 8. As requested, review all claims made against the City. 9. Confer with colleagues who specialize in areas of law to establish and verify 4 a basis for legal proceedings; serve as a liaison between outside legal counsel and City Officials on specialized legal issues. 10. Prepare a monthly written report to the City Manager of legal services performed which includes a description of the service and the time required to perform the service. 11. Assist the City Clerk and the private sector firm in Ordinance Codification. 12. The City Attorney will be an advisor to the labor negotiating staff and will review labor contracts as required or requested. 13. Maintain professional awareness of current literature and changes in law and attend continuing legal education to ensure the most efficient, cost- effective, and accurate operation of the City Attorney’s Office. 14. Review proposed state legislation affecting the City and prepare or supervise the preparation of state legislation relating to municipal and city government matters as directed by the City Manager or City Council. Consult with City Council, the City Manager and department heads in regard to such legislation and testify before legislative boards as requested. 15. The City Attorney’s basic fee does not include the following services: a. Litigation b. Recodification of substantially all of the City Ordinances. All services with the exception of litigation and recodification of the City Ordinances will be compensated pursuant to the City Attorney’s basic fee. Fees for services in a. and b. above will be as negotiated and agreed upon by the parties. City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2019-0478,Version:1 Executive Session, pursuant to SDCL 1-25-2, for purposes of consulting with legal counsel or reviewing communications from legal counsel about proposed or pending litigation or contractual matters. SDCL 1-25-2. Executive or closed meetings--Purposes--Authorization--Violation as misdemeanor. Executive or closed meetings may be held for the sole purposes of: 1) Discussing the qualifications, competence, performance, character or fitness of any public officer or employee or prospective public officer or employee. The term, employee, does not include any independent contractor; 2) Discussing the expulsion, suspension, discipline, assignment of or the educational program of a student or the eligibility of a student to participate in interscholastic activities provided by the South Dakota High School Activities Association; 3) Consulting with legal counsel or reviewing communications from legal counsel about proposed or pending litigation or contractual matters; 4) Preparing for contract negotiations or negotiating with employees or employee representatives; 5) Discussing marketing or pricing strategies by a board or commission of a business owned by the state or any of its political subdivisions, when public discussion may be harmful to the competitive position of the business; or 6) Discussing information listed in subdivisions 1-27-1.5(8) and 1-27-1.5(17). However, any official action concerning such matters shall be made at an open official meeting. An executive or closed meeting shall be held only upon a majority vote of the members of the public body present and voting, and discussion during the closed meeting is restricted to the purpose specified in the closure motion. Nothing in § 1-25-1 or this section prevents an executive or closed meeting if the federal or state Constitution or the federal or state statutes require or permit it. A violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor. Source: SL 1965, ch 269; SL 1980, ch 24, § 10; SL 1987, ch 22, § 1; SL 2014, ch 90, § 2; SL 2019, ch 2, § 1 City of Brookings Printed on 11/8/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™