The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018_01_09 CC PKTCity Council City of Brookings Meeting Agenda Brookings City Council Brookings City & County Government Center 520 3rd St., Suite 230 Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: (605) 692-6281 Fax: (605) 692-6907 "We are an inclusive, diverse, connected community that fuels the creative class, embraces sustainability and pursues a complete lifestyle. We are committed to building a bright future through dedication, generosity and authenticity. Bring your dreams!" Council Chambers6:00 PMTuesday, January 9, 2018 The City of Brookings is committed to providing a high quality of life for its citizens and fostering a diverse economic base through innovative thinking, strategic planning, and proactive, fiscally responsible municipal management. 6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING 1. Call to Order / Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Record of Council Attendance. 3. Consent Agenda: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call Matters appearing on the Consent Agenda are expected to be non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Council at one time, without discussion, unless a member of the Council or City Manager requests an opportunity to address any given item. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be discussed at the beginning of the formal items. Approval by the Council of the Consent Agenda items means that the recommendation of the City Manager is approved along with the terms and conditions described in the agenda supporting documentation. 3.A. Action to approve the agenda. 3.B.ID 2018-0002 Action to approve the December 12, 2017 City Council Minutes. 2017_12_12 CC MinutesAttachments: 3.C.ID 2018-0015 Action on Planning Commission appointments. 3.D.RES 18-004 Action on Resolution 18-004, a Resolution to declare Ballistic Vest as surplus property (Police Dept.) Page 1 City of Brookings January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Agenda Resolution Deuel County Agreement Attachments: 3.E.RES 18-002 Action on Resolution 18-002, a Resolution directing preparation of the Assessment Roll, dividing Assessments into Installments, and providing for the collection thereof for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA, Alley from 1st Street South and 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South. ResolutionAttachments: 3.F.RES 18-003 Action on Resolution 18-003, a Resolution directing preparation of the Assessment Roll, dividing Assessments into Installments, and providing for the collection thereof for Sidewalk Assessment Project 2017-01SWR (2017 Sidewalk Repairs). ResolutionAttachments: 3.G.ID 2018-0012 Action to abate the 2016, 2017 and 2018 Drainage Fees and interest for Parcel Number 40490-01400-000-00, otherwise known as railroad right-of-way in the Fourteenth Railroad Addition in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Abatement FormAttachments: 3.H.ID 2018-0007 Action on a Preliminary Plat of Lots 24-28, Block 7; Lots 6-32, Block 10; Lots 1-5, Block 11; Lots 1-21, Block 12; Lots 1-12, Block 13; Lots 1-19, Block 14; Lots 1-13, Block 15; Lots 1-29, Block 16; all of Timberline Addition. Planning Commission Minutes 12-5-2017 Hearing Notice Preliminary Plat Previous Preliminary Plat Floodplain Map Attachments: 3.I.ID 2018-0006 Action on a Preliminary Plat for Lots 15-21, Block 11 of Bluegill Second Addition. Planning Commission Minutes 12-5-2017 Hearing Notice Preliminary Plat Attachments: 4. Items removed from Consent Agenda. Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call 5. Open Forum/Presentations/Reports: 5.A. Open Forum. Page 2 City of Brookings January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Agenda At this time, any member of the public may request time on the agenda for an item not listed. Items are typically scheduled for the end of the meeting; however, very brief announcements or invitations will be allowed at this time. 5.B. SDSU Student Association Report. 5.C.ID 2018-0009 Informational Presentation by Brookings Regional Humane Society. PresentationAttachments: 6. Contracts/Change Orders: 7. Ordinance First Readings: No vote is taken on the first reading of an Ordinance. The title of the Ordinance is read and the date for the public hearing is announced. 8. Public Hearings and Second Readings: 8.A.ID 2018-0001 Public Hearing and Action on a request for an On-Off Malt Alcohol License for a Brewpub at 126 Main Avenue South, Sean Weber, owner, legal description: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Folsom Addition. Legal NoticeAttachments: Action: Open & Close Public Hearing, Motion to Approve, Roll Call 8.B.ORD 17-026 Second Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-026, an Ordinance amending Section 94-398 of the Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges. Ordinance - clean copy posted 1-02-2018 Ordiance - marked copy posted 1-02-2018 Ordinance - clean copy Ordinance - marked copy Planning Commission Minutes 9/5/2017, 10/3/2017, 11/7/2017 Hearing Notice Comparison Chart Attachments: Action: Open & Close Public Hearing, Motion to Approve, Roll Call Legislative History 11/28/17 City Council read into the record 12/12/17 City Council amended 12/12/17 City Council referred to subsequent meeting 8.C.ORD 17-031 Second Reading and Action on Ordinance 17-031, an Ordinance Revising Article IV, Site Runoff and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Page 3 City of Brookings January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Agenda Ordinance - clean copy Ordinance - marked copy Attachments: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call Legislative History 12/12/17 City Council read into the record 8.D.ORD 17-032 Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-032, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of S½ of the NW¼ of Section 34-T110N-R50W from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District (Timberline Addition). Ordinance Planning Commission Hearing Notice Planning Commission Minutes 12/5/2017 Rezoning Map Current Zoning Map Attachments: Action: Open & Close Public Hearing, Motion to Approve, Roll Call Legislative History 12/12/17 City Council read into the record 8.E.ORD 17-033 Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-033, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of Bluegill Second Addition; a portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE ¼ NE ¼ excluding W 44’ thereof and exluding N 30’ and excluding the E 300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N-R50W from an A, Agricultural District to Residence R-1D Single Family District. Ordinance 12-5-2017 Planning Commission Minutes Notice Rezoning Map Attachments: Action: Open & Close Public Hearing, Motion to Approve, Roll Call Legislative History 12/12/17 City Council read into the record 8.F.ORD 17-034 Second Reading and Action on Ordinance 17-034, an Ordinance Amending the Landscaping Regulations. Page 4 City of Brookings January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Agenda Ordinance as recommended by Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes 12/05/2017, 11/7/2017, 10/3/2017, 9/5/2017 Planning Commission Hearing Notice Landscaping Reference Table Bluegill - Apartment Examples Attachments: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call Legislative History 12/12/17 City Council read into the record 8.G.RES 18-001 Public Hearing and Action on Resolution 18-001, a Resolution authorizing a Real Estate Exchange Agreement between the City of Brookings and John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC. Resolution Agreement Mills Exchange Maps Notice Attachments: Action: Open & Close Public Hearing, Motion to Approve, Roll Call 9. Other Business: 9.A.ID 2018-0010 Discussion and possible action on the scope of work and proposed project for remodeling of the County Resource Center for the Swiftel Center. Renovations EstimateAttachments: Action: Motion to Approve, Request Public Comment, Roll Call 10.ID 2018-0017 National League of Cities Conference & Exposition Report. 11. City Council member introduction of topics for future discussion. Any Council Member may request discussion of any issue at a future meeting only. Items cannot be added for action at this meeting. A motion and second is required stating the issue, requested outcome, and time. A majority vote is required. 12. Adjourn. Brookings City Council: Keith Corbett, Mayor, Mary Kidwiler, Deputy Mayor & Council Member Council Members Patty Bacon, Dan Hansen, Ope Niemeyer, Holly Tilton Byrne, and Nick Wendell Council Staff: Jeffrey W. Weldon, City Manager Steven Britzman, City Attorney Shari Thornes, City Clerk View the City Council Meeting Live on the City Government Access Channel 9. Rebroadcast Schedule: Wednesday 1:00pm/Thursday 7:00pm/Friday 9:00pm/Saturday 1:00pm The complete City Council agenda packet is available on the city website: www.cityofbrookings.org Assisted Listening Systems (ALS) are available upon request. Please contact Shari Thornes, Brookings City Clerk, at (605)692-6281 or sthornes@cityofbrookings.org. If you require additional assistance, alternative formats, and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact Shari Thornes, City ADA Coordinator, at (605)692-6281 at least three working days prior to the meeting. Page 5 City of Brookings January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Agenda Page 6 City of Brookings City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0002,Version:1 Action to approve the December 12, 2017 City Council Minutes. Attachments: 12/12/2017 Minutes City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Brookings City Council December 12, 2017 (unapproved) The Brookings City Council held a meeting on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., at City Hall with the following City Council members present: Mayor Keith Corbett, Council Members Mary Kidwiler, Dan Hansen, Holly Tilton Byrne, Nick Wendell, Patty Bacon, and Ope Niemeyer. City Manager Jeff Weldon, City Attorney Steve Britzman, and Deputy City Clerk Bonnie Foster were also present. 5:00 PM Executive Session A motion was made by Council Member Niemeyer, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne, to enter into Executive Session for purposes of discussing the qualifications, competence, performance, character or fitness of any public officer or employee or prospective public officer or employee with the City Council and City Manager present. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. A motion was made by Council Member Kidwiler, seconded by Council Member Hansen, to exit Executive Session Item at 5:47 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Open Forum Kevin Nelson expressed concern regarding a sign located at the corner of Folsom St. & Main Ave. So. In his opinion, the sign blocks the view for traffic turning onto Main Ave. So. 6:00 PM Regular Meeting Consent Agenda.A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Kidwiler, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. A. Action to approve the agenda. B. Action to approve the November 28, 2017 City Council Minutes. C. Action on the following appointments to City Boards, Committees, and Commissions:Bicycle Advisory Committee: reappoint Emily Braun, Eric Rasmussen, and Joanie Holm (terms expire 1/1/2021); Board of Adjustment: appoint Justin Borns (term expires 1/1/2021), appoint Teresa Binkley (term expires 1/1/2019); Board of Appeals: reappoint George Houtman (term expires 1/1/2023); Board of Health: reappoint Paul Irwin, Robert Brotsky, Albert Patin, and Tricia Matson Buus (terms expire 1/1/2021); Brookings Committee for People who have Disabilities: reappoint Lonnie Bayer, Laura Crooks, and Shawn Minor (terms expire 1/1/2020), reappoint Dave Miller, Jessie Kuechenmeister, Nancy Hartenhoff Crooks, and Nadine Gjerde (terms expire 1/1/2021); Brookings Health System Board of Trustees: reappoint Walter Wosje (term expires 1/1/2021); Brookings Historic Preservation Commission: reappoint Carrie Kuhl, Janet Merriman, and Janet Gritzner (terms expire 1/1/2021); Business Improvement District #1 Board: appoint Randy Soma (term expires 1/1/2021); Human Rights Commission: reappoint Lawrence Novotny and Maggie Owens (terms expire 1/1/2021), appoint Erinn Osborne (term expires 1/1/2021), appoint Hanna Larsen Holmquist (term expires 1/1/2020); Library Board: reappoint James Rice (term expires 1/1/2021), appoint Sarah Meusburger (term expires 1/1/2021); Planning Commission: reappoint Lee Ann Pierce (term expires 12/31/2022); Public Arts Commission: reappoint Trayce Meyer, Linda Purrington, and Darla Biel (terms expire 1/1/2021); Sustainability Council: reappoint Jane Hegland, Mike Lockrem, and Robert McGrath (terms expire 1/1/2021); Swiftel Center Advisory Board: appoint Nick Schmeichel (term expires 1/1/2021); Traffic Safety Committee: reappoint Gary Gramm (term expires 12/31/2020), appoint Justin Bucher (term expires 12/31/2020), and appoint Staci Perry as Chamber Rep (term expires 12/31/2020). Resolution 17-114. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that Resolution 17-114, a Resolution Authorizing Change Order No. 1 (CCO#1) for 2017-04STI, Traffic Signal Improvement Project, 2nd Street South & Main Avenue South and 5th Street South & Medary Avenue South; Bowes Construction, Inc., be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Resolution 17-114 - Resolution Authorizing Change Order No. 1 (CCO#1) for 2017- 04STI Traffic Signal Improvements Project, 2nd Street South & Main Avenue South and 5th Street South & Medary Avenue South, Bowes Construction, Inc. Be It Resolved by the City Council that the following change order be allowed for 2017-04STI, Traffic Signal Improvements Project, 2nd Street South & Main Avenue South and 5th Street South & Medary Avenue South: Construction Change Order Number 1: Adjust plan quantities to current as-constructed quantities and for additional work to provide temporary signal wiring, fast track concrete, driveway work, landscaping work and curb grinding for a total increase of $14,104.61 to the contract. FIRST READING – Ordinance 17-031. Introduction and first reading was held on Ordinance 17-031, an Ordinance Revising Article IV, Site Runoff and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Second Reading: January 9, 2018. FIRST READING – Ordinance 17-032. Introduction and first reading was held on Ordinance 17-032, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of the S ½ of the NW ¼ of Section 34-T110N-R50W from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District (Timberline Addition). Public Hearing: January 9, 2018. FIRST READING – Ordinance 17-033. Introduction and first reading was held on Ordinance 17-033, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of Bluegill Second Addition; a portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE ¼ of the NE ¼ excluding the West 44’ thereof and excluding the North 30’ and excluding the East 300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N-R50W from an A, Agricultural District to a Residence R-1D Single Family District. Public Hearing: January 9, 2018. FIRST READING – Ordinance 17-034. Introduction and first reading was held on Ordinance 17-034, an Ordinance Amending the Landscaping Regulations. Second Reading: January 9, 2018. Resolution 17-103. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Kidwiler, that Resolution 17-103, a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Operating Agreement for a Liquor License for Jesse Davis LLC, dba Craft Fusion, Jesse Davis, owner, 610 Medary Ave., Brookings, SD, legal description: Lots 3, 4, 5 Randi Peterson Addition, be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Resolution 17-103 - Jesse Davis LLC, dba Craft Fusion On-Sale Liquor Operating Agreement Be It Resolved by the City of Brookings, South Dakota, that the City Council hereby approves a Lease Agreement for the Operating Liquor Management Agreement for Liquor between the City of Brookings and Jesse Davis LLC, dba Craft Fusion, Jesse Davis, owner, for the purpose of a liquor manager to operate the on-sale establishment or business for and on behalf of the City of Brookings at 610 Medary Ave.: legal description: Lots 3, 4, 5 Randi Peterson Addition. Be It Further Resolved that the City Manager be authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, which shall be for a period of five (5) years and renewal for another five (5) years. Ordinance 17-025. Second reading was held on Ordinance 17-025, an Ordinance revising Division 3 of Chapter 82 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Speed Zones in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that Ordinance 17- 025 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Ordinance 17-026. A public hearing was held on Ordinance 17-026, an Ordinance amending Section 94-398 of the Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges. Public Comment: Josh Westwick. A motion was made by Council Member Niemeyer, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne, to approve Ordinance 17-026. An Amendment was made by Council Member Wendell, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne, to separate hedges from walls and fences, using the same language as stated in A1, to change hedge maximum height to 72” when located between the front lot line and principal building, with a maximum height of 30” if located within the sight triangle. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. An additional public hearing will be held on January 9, 2018. Ordinance 17-027. Second reading was held on Ordinance 17-027, an Ordinance amending Section 42-102 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings, SD and pertaining to Transfers to the Brookings Health System Investment Authority. A motion was made by Council Member Kidwiler, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that Ordinance 17-027 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Ordinance 17-028. Second reading was held on Ordinance 17-028, an Ordinance amending Chapter 2, Article V, Division 4 pertaining to appointments to the Swiftel Center Advisory Board. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne that Ordinance 17-028 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Ordinance 17-029. Second reading was held on Ordinance 17-029, an Ordinance amending Chapter 22 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and providing Procedures for the Licensing of Residential Contractors in the City of Brookings, SD. Public Comment: George Houtman and Charles Wallowing Bull. A motion was made by Council Member Bacon, seconded by Council Member Kidwiler, that Ordinance 17-029 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Ordinance 17-030. Second reading was held on Ordinance 17-030, an Ordinance authorizing Supplemental Appropriation #3 to the 2017 Budget. A motion was made by Council Member Wendell, seconded by Council Member Hansen, that Ordinance 17- 030 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Resolution 17-112. A public hearing was held on Resolution 17-112, a Resolution Levying Assessment for 2017 Assessment of the 2014-02STA, Main Avenue South and 26th Street South Reassessment. A motion was made by Council Member Niemeyer, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne, that Resolution 17-112 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Resolution 17-112 - Levying Assessment for 2017 Assessment of the 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Reassessment Whereas, the City Council has provided for the work completed under Project No. 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Project, now therefore, Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 05-14 and has made all investigation which it deemed necessary and has found and determined that the amount which each lot or tract is benefited by the construction of the street improvement heretofore designated as Street Assessment Project 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Project in the amount is the amount stated in the proposed assessment roll. 2. The City Council adopted Resolution 15-096 Levying Assessment for Project No. 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Street Assessment Project and the requirements have not been met for parcel number 40970-10950-022-00 located in the N1550’ of the NW1/4, Exc platted areas & Exc. the S640’ of the N1062’ of E246’ & Exc. S20’ of N422’ of E223’ & Exc. the W40’ of E223’ of S165’ of N402’, Section 2-T109N-R50W and parcel number 40970-10950-022-15 located in the W1/2 of the NW ¼ Exc. N1550’ & Exc. Platted areas, Section 2- T109N-R50W, as referenced on the 2014-02STA Assessment Roll approved by Resolution 15-096 on September 22, 2015. The assessment is therefore being amended and reassessed, and collected by the City in accordance with the procedure for Plan One in Section 9-43-102, South Dakota Compiled Laws of 1967, as amended. 3. The City Council adopted Resolution 17-034 to levy the assessment for the 2017 Assessment of the 2014-02STA Main Avenue & 26th Street South Reassessment as referenced on the 2014-02STA Assessment Roll approved by Resolution 17-034 on March 28, 2017. 4. The City Council adopted Resolution 17-067 to levy the assessment for the 2017 Assessment of the 2014-02STA Main Avenue & 26th Street South Reassessment as referenced on the 2014-02STA Assessment Roll approved by Resolution 17-067 on July 11, 2017. 5. The 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Assessment and Reassessment thereof have been revised as shown on the Assessment Roll filed with the City Clerk’s Office on 11/20/17 and are hereby approved and the assessments set forth in the assessment roll are hereby levied against each and every lot, piece or parcel of land as described in the proposed assessment roll. The assessment roll has been modified to reflect prior payments and adjustments commensurate with Resolution 17- 067 as adopted by the City Council. Assessments in the sum of $605,014.58 are set forth on the assessment roll, however these assessments will be removed from the assessment roll if there is no valid objection or other action preventing the reassessment and levy of the 2017 Assessment of the 2014-02STA Main Avenue South & 26th Street South Reassessment as set forth herein. 6. The assessment shall be divided into ten (10) equal annual installments. 7. Such assessments, unless paid within thirty (30) days after the date of mailing of a statement of account by the City, shall be collected by the City in accordance with the procedure for Plan One in Sections to SDCL 9-43-102, South Dakota Compiled Laws of 1967, as amended. 8. Interest of ten (10) percent per annum shall accrue on the unpaid balance of the assessment for a maximum of ten (10) years. 9. The revised assessment and collection procedures set forth herein replace the assessment payment procedures for Parcel 40970-10950-021-00 as set forth in Resolution 15-096 dated September 22, 2015. Resolution 17-113. A motion was made by Council Member Niemeyer, seconded by Council Member Wendell, that Resolution 17-113, a Resolution Amending the Fee Schedule of the City of Brookings, South Dakota (Residential Contractor’s License), be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Corbett, Niemeyer, Hansen, Kidwiler, Bacon, Wendell, and Tilton Byrne. Resolution 17-113 - A Resolution Amending the Fee Schedule of the City of Brookings, South Dakota (Residential Contractor’s License) Whereas the fines, fees, and procedures pertaining to services of the City of Brookings shall be reviewed and revised; and Whereas, license fees have been established by various chapters of the Code of Ordinances; and Whereas, the City of Brookings Engineer’s Department fees shall be revised, pursuant to Ordinance No. 17-029, to establish an annual license fee for the Residential Contractor’s License for the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the following permit fee be adopted: City Engineer’s Department Residential Contractor’s License: $75.00 annually. 2018 City Manager Compensation Package. A motion was made by Mayor Corbett, seconded by Council Member Niemeyer, that the 2018 City Manager Compensation Package (increase of $6,277.09, for a total salary of $163,204.29; to include a $500 mileage fee for any trips outside of Brookings County), be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Adjourn. A motion was made by Council Member Hansen, seconded by Council Member Wendell, to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CITY OF BROOKINGS Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0015,Version:1 Action on Planning Commission appointments. Summary: Mayor Keith Corbett has submitted the following Planning Commission appointment recommendations for City Council advice and consent: Planning Commission Number of positions: 2 Term Length: 5 years Residency Requirement: Required Purpose: The City Planning Commission is responsible for the city comprehensive plan for the physical development of the city, including areas outside the boundaries of the city and within the planning jurisdiction. Mayor’s Recommendation: 1. Appoint Charles D. Siver 2. Appoint Gregg Jorgenson Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 18-004,Version:2 Action on Resolution 18-004, a Resolution to declare Ballistic Vest as surplus property (Police Dept.) Summary: Officer Laurie Smith has resigned her position with the Brookings Police department effective January 7, 2018. She will begin working for the Deuel County Sheriff’s office and has requested to keep her ballistic vest for use in her new position. Ballistic vests are purchased as a capital expenditure and half the purchase cost is reimbursed from the Federal Government. Ballistic vests are made to fit the officer they are intended for and are male/female specific. Officer Smith’s vest would most likely not fit anyone else properly and would be best utilized if she were to retain possession. A memo transferring ownership from the City of Brookings to Deuel County is attached. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Resolution Deuel County Agreement City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Resolution 18-004 Resolution to declare Ballistic Vest as surplus property (Police Dept.) Whereas, the City of Brookings purchases Ballistic Vests as a capital expenditure, and half the cost is reimbursed from the Federal Government; and Whereas, Officer Laurie Smith has resigned her position with the Brookings Police department effective January 7, 2018. She will begin working for the Deuel County Sheriff’s office and has requested to keep her ballistic vest for use in her new position; and Whereas, Ballistic vests are made to fit the officer they are intended for and are male/female specific. Officer Smith’s vest would most likely not fit anyone else properly and would be best utilized if she were to retain possession. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the governing body of the City of Brookings, SD, that this property be declared surplus property according to SDCL Chapter 6-13. Passed and approved this 9th day of January, 2018. CITY OF BROOKINGS ___________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 18-002,Version:1 Action on Resolution 18-002, a Resolution directing preparation of the Assessment Roll, dividing Assessments into Installments, and providing for the collection thereof for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA, Alley from 1st Street South and 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South. Summary: This resolution will approve directing the preparation of the Assessment Roll for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA, Alley from 1st Street South and 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South. Background: The City received a petition to pave the alley from 1st Street South to 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South. The City Council approved Resolution of Necessity 16-103 on December 13, 2016, authorizing the City to proceed with bidding the project. The project included excavation, gravel and asphalt pavement and the final change order has been approved. The City is proceeding with the process to assess the property owners with their portion of the construction and engineering costs. The assessment for all abutting properties shall be divided into five (5) equal annual installments and interest of ten (10) percent per annum shall accrue on the unpaid balance of the assessment. This resolution directs the preparation of the Assessment Roll and dividing into installments for the 2017-05 STA, Alley from 1st Street South and 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South. There will be two upcoming resolutions; one to set the hearing date and one to levy the street assessment. Fiscal Impact: The assessment costs will be approved with the resolution to levy the project. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Resolution City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Resolution 18-002 Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll, Dividing Assessments into Installments, and providing for the collection thereof for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA, Alley from 1st Street South to 2nd Street South between 5th Avenue South and 6th Avenue South Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, as follows: 1. More than twenty days have elapsed since the adoption and publication of Resolution of Necessity 16-103 for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA. The referendum has not been invoked, and no written protests against the making of said improvement have been filed with the City Manager. 2. A contract for Alley Assessment Project 2017-05STA has been duly executed, and the City Council is authorized to levy special assessments pursuant to the provisions of chapter 9-43, SDCL 1967, as amended. 3. The City Engineer has caused an estimate of the expense of the work to be made and filed in her office showing the total cost of said improvement as follows: Final contract price:$33,317.05 Engineering, inspection, fiscal, legal expense, publication $1,761.69 Total Expense $35,078.74 4. The total cost of said improvement shall be paid as follows: Assessable costs $29,361.50 City costs: sidewalk & alley approach $3,955.55 5. There shall be made and filed in the office of the City Clerk an assessment roll for said improvement. The costs for the alley shall be assessed against all abutting lots and tracts of land on the basis of front foot upon each lot or tract of land contiguous to the alley constituting said improvement. 6. The assessment for all assessable properties shall be divided into five (5) equal annual installments and interest of ten (10) percent per annum shall accrue on the unpaid balance of the assessment. 7. Unless paid to the City in advance of maturity, the assessments shall be collected by the City Manager in accordance with the procedure for Plan One in Chapter 9-43, SDCL 1967, as amended. Passed and approved this 9th day of January, 2018. CITY OF BROOKINGS __________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 18-003,Version:1 Action on Resolution 18-003, a Resolution directing preparation of the Assessment Roll, dividing Assessments into Installments, and providing for the collection thereof for Sidewalk Assessment Project 2017-01SWR (2017 Sidewalk Repairs). Summary: This resolution will authorize the City to prepare the Assessment Roll for 2017-01SWR, 2017 Sidewalk Repairs. This project is the annual concrete project and entails construction of miscellaneous concrete work including curb and gutter repair, fillets, valley gutters, curb ramps, and sidewalk along vacant property. This project also includes homeowner trip hazards that weren’t repaired in the 2016 sidewalk area, which is east of Medary Avenue South and between 6th Street and Orchard Drive and property owners in the 2017 sidewalk area who volunteered to be in the project, which is north of 6 th Street and east of Medary Avenue. Resolution 16-045 was adopted on June 14, 2016 and authorized the Sidewalk Assessment Project for the trip hazard sidewalks and Resolution 17-061 was adopted June 13, 2017 which authorized the Sidewalk Assessment Project for the new sidewalk locations. The assessment cost for each property owner is calculated by using their specific sidewalk cost plus a 6% fee for engineering and administration. This resolution directs the preparation of the Assessment Roll for the sidewalk repairs in the 2017-01SWR project. There will be two upcoming resolutions; one to set the hearing date and one to levy the sidewalk assessment. Fiscal Impact: The City will collect the assessment costs for the sidewalk repairs. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Resolution City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Resolution 18-003 Resolution Directing Preparation Of Assessment Roll, Dividing Assessments Into Installments, And Providing For The Collection Thereof For Sidewalk Assessment, Project 2016-01SWR (2017 Sidewalk Repairs) Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, as follows: 1. More than twenty days have elapsed since the adoption and publication of Resolution 16-045 and Resolution 17-061, Resolution Determining the Necessity of Repairing or Installing Sidewalks for Sidewalk Assessment Project No. 2017-01SWR. The referendum has not been invoked, and no written protests against the making of said improvement have been filed with the City Manager. 2. A contract for Sidewalk Assessment Project No. 2017-01SWR has been duly executed, and the City Council is authorized to levy special assessments pursuant to the provisions of chapter 9-43, SDCL 1967, as amended. 3. The City Engineer has caused an estimate of the expense of the work to be made and filed in City Hall showing the total cost of said improvement as follows: Contract price $207,585.91 Engineering, inspection, fiscal, legal expense, publication $ 2,030.15 Total Expense $209,616.06 4. The total cost of said improvement shall be paid as follows: City Repair Costs $173,750.11 Assessable costs $ 33,835.80 5. There shall be made and filed in the office of the City Clerk an assessment roll for said improvement. The assessments shall be on the basis of benefits upon each lot or tract of land contiguous to the sidewalk constituting said improvement. 6. The assessment shall be divided into five (5) equal annual installments for all amounts over $300.00. For amounts of $300.00 or less, the entire assessment shall be due. 7. Unless paid to the City in advance of maturity, the assessments shall be collected by the City Manager in accordance with the procedure for Plan One in Chapter 9-43, SDCL 1967, as amended. 8. The interest rate to be borne by the unpaid installments of the special assessment is ten percent (10%). Passed and approved this 9th day of January, 2018. CITY OF BROOKINGS ___________________________________ ATTEST:Keith W. Corbett, Mayor Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0012,Version:1 Action to abate the 2016, 2017 and 2018 Drainage Fees and interest for Parcel Number 40490- 01400-000-00, otherwise known as railroad right-of-way in the Fourteenth Railroad Addition in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Summary: This motion will authorize Brookings County to abate the 2016, 2017 and 2018 Drainage Fees and interest in the amount of $20.48 for Parcel Number 40490-01400-000-00, which is a portion of railroad right-of-way in the Fourteenth Railroad Addition. Background: Parcel Number 40490-01400-000-00 is a platted parcel of railroad right-of-way located where 12th Avenue right-of-way intersects the railroad right-of-way in the Fourteenth Railroad Addition. This parcel incorrectly had a Drainage Fee assigned to it, and the fee should be zero since the parcel is right-of-way. This motion will abate the following drainage fees and interest: 2016: $13.28 2017: $3.63 2018: $3.57 Total: $20.48 This motion will abate the drainage fees and interest in the amount of $20.48 from Parcel Number 40490-01400-000-00. Fiscal Impact: The Drainage Fee Revenue will be reduced by $20.48. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Abatement Form City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Brookings City Clerk Abatement and Refunds South Dakota Codified Law 10-18-6 & 7 stipulates that no tax on property within a municipal corporation shall be abated or refunded without the approval of the governing body of said Municipal Corporation, duly filed with said application. In any case where the concurrence of a municipality in the granting of any abatement of refund is required, the action of the municipality shall be certified to and filed with the county auditor of the county within thirty days after an application for such concurrence shall have been filed with the clerk or the presiding officer of the governing body of such municipality, and if not so filed with said county auditor within such time, the municipality shall be deemed to have concurred in granting the application. Application: City of Brookings Year: 2016, 2017 & 2018 Abatement Amount: $20.48 Parcel Number:40490-01400-000-00 Legal Description: Fourteenth Railroad Addition Background: This parcel is railroad right-of-way and is not subject to drainage fees. The abatement is as follows: 2016 drainage fee & interest:$13.28 2017 drainage fee & interest: $3.63 2018 drainage fee: $3.57 Total: $20.48 I hereby certify that on January 9, 2018, the following attached application for abatement or refund of taxes has been duly acted on by the governing body of the city or town of Brookings, in Brookings, South Dakota. Such action is recorded in the official minutes of said municipality, dated January 9, 2018, and reads as follows: “A motion was made by CM ??, seconded by CM ??, to approve an abatement request made by the City of Brookings to abate the drainage fee and interest in the amount of $20.48 for Parcel No. 40490-01400-000-00, located in Fourteenth Railroad Addition. “All present voted yes; motion carried.” Signed by: ______________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings, Brookings, SD City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0007,Version:1 Action on a Preliminary Plat of Lots 24-28, Block 7; Lots 6-32, Block 10; Lots 1-5, Block 11; Lots 1- 21, Block 12; Lots 1-12, Block 13; Lots 1-19, Block 14; Lots 1-13, Block 15; Lots 1-29, Block 16; all of Timberline Addition. Summary: The applicant is seeking Preliminary Plat approval of 131 residential lots in Timberline Addition. The plat has been redesigned from a previous version that was approved by the Planning Commission on March 14, 2017. Background: The vacant parcel of land is located west of Timberline Addition and will be accessed by an extension of Summit Pass and Steamboat Trail. The property has multiple zoning districts including: R-1C, R-2, R-3, and R-1D. The owner has proposed a rezoning request along with the Preliminary Plat so the zoning corresponds to the new layout and remedies lots with split zoning. The general area includes a mix of residential to the north and east and vacant farmland to the south and west. Summit Pass and Brighton Road are classified as collector streets while all the other streets are considered local streets. The new design offers increased density with 19 additional lots on the same land area as the previously approved Preliminary Plat. The layout also eliminates two (2) cul-de-sacs and provides additional connectivity throughout the development. A portion of land along the west side of the development is located within the 100 year floodplain. The owner is planning to raise the elevation to meet the requirements of the floodplain ordinance. The City Parks Master Plan shows a mini/neighborhood park on the south side of the property. City staff will discuss parkland options with the owner. Findings of Fact: 1. The Preliminary Plat is showing adequate access and right-of-way widths, block lengths, and cul-de-sac designs. The overall design meets the requirements. 2. The lot sizes and frontage requirements for the corresponding zoning districts are met. 3. City services are available and will be extended to serve the property. 4. The secondary access requirement will apply at the Final Plat stage. Staff Recommendations: 1.Name street connections to the north on Final Plat. 2.All necessary utility and drainage easements shall be shown on the Final Plat. 3.Staff will continue to discuss parkland options with the owner. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat. City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:ID 2018-0007,Version:1 Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes 12-5-2017 Hearing Notice Preliminary Plat Previously Approved Preliminary Plat Floodplain Map City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota December 5, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #6a –Sioux Empire Development Corporation has submitted a revised preliminary plat of Lots 24-28, Block 7; Lots 6-32, Block 10; Lots 1-5, Block 11; Lots 1- 21, Block 12; Lots 1-12, Block 13; Lots 1-19, Block 14; Lots 1-13, Block 15; Lots 1-29, Block 16; all in Timberline Addition in the SE1/2 of the NW1/4 and the W1/2 of the NE1/4, Section 34-T110N-R50W. (Pierce/Gregg ) Motion to approve the revised preliminary plat subject to an approved preliminary drainage report being approved by the City Engineer, the name street connections to the north need to be noted on the Final Plat, all necessary utility and drainage easements shall be shown on the Final Plat and the owner shall resolve all parkland issues with city staff. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #6a –This is a preliminary plat of 131 residential lots in Timberline Addition. The plat has been redesigned from a previous version that Planning Commission approved in March of 2017. This vacant parcel of land is located west of Timberline Addition and will be accessed by an extension of Summit Pass and Steamboat Trail. The general area includes a mix of residential to the north and east and vacant farmland to the south and west. Pierce noted that the Comprehensive Plan consultant is suggesting that the city look at eliminate cul-de-sacs and she appreciates that two cul-de-sacs have been removed in this revised plat. Drew asked if a secondary access requirement will need to be met? Bungard stated yes, that this will be required on the Final Plat. Tornquist questioned where the water is going to go from the land that is in the 100 year flood plain. Bungard explained that this will be resolved and shown on the Final Plat. If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. NOTICE OF HEARING ON A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That Sioux Empire Development Corp. has submitted a revised preliminary plat of the following described real estate situated in the City of Brookings in Brookings County, South Dakota, to wit: Preliminary Plat of Lots 24-28, Block 7; Lots 6-32, Block 10; Lots 1-5, Block 11; Lots 1-21, Block 12; Lots 1-12, Block 13; Lots 1-19, Block 14; Lots 1-13, Block 15; Lots 1-29, Block 16; all of Timberline Addition in the SE1/2 of the NW1/4 and the W1/2 of the NE1/4 Section 34-T110N-R50W. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City and County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT 30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8' ' S8'' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S8'' S24'' ST18'' ST24'' ST 36'' ST8'' W8'' W8'' W 8'' W8'' W 8'' W 8'' W8'' W8'' W2122BLOCK 6BLOCK 817181919A1234521222316E264'N1/2 NW1/434-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: GREENWOODCEMETERY ASSOC.)BK: 119 PG 647E1635' N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. CLITES ADDN & EXC E264' BUT INCLUDING APARCEL OF LAND ABUTTING BLK 3 CLITES ADD'N TO THE EAST ANDBLK 4 CLITES ADD'N TO THE WEST34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: SIOUX EMPIRE DEV. CORP)BK: 142 PG 686W338' N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. S92'34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: MICHEL H. & VICKY J. CLITES)BK: 142 PG 720N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. E1635' & EXC. E540' W878' N219' & EXC. W338'INC. S92' W338' 34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: GERARD J. & JEAN MORIARTY)BK: 142 PG 644N1/2 SW1/4 34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: SIOUX EMPIRE DEV. CORP)BK: 131 PG 24712'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W168'± 153'±54'±75'±101'±96'±75'±97'±8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8' ' W8' ' W 8'' W 8'' W 12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8' ' W8'' W8'' W8'' W90'±94'±92'±164'±17'±6 2 '±33'± 105'±14'±24'±R60'R6 0 '8'' W115'±119'±13'±R60'8'' W8'' W59'±75'±103'±161'±89'± 55'±55'±55'±76'±164'±47'±20'±5 6 '± 61 '±62'±77'±77'±140'±40'±127'±62'±5 3'± 54'± 43'±87'±150'±33'EXIST. ROW.35'PROPOSED ROW.1' "NA"ESMT.12'' W12'' WRED ROCK LANE8'' W8'' W170'±40'±73'±1' "NA"ESMT.DURANGO PASS171'± 173'± 174'± 175'±102'±100'±SSS8'' S8'' SS8' ' W8' ' W8' ' S 8'' W 8'' W 8'' W 8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S125'±100 '±186'±163'±125'±130'±125'±186'±21'±64'±21'±75'±75'±56'±142'±100'±59'±43'±10'±76'±50'±5 4 '±54'±80'±38'±37'±75'±75'±75'±71'±SS8'' SSSSS8'' SS8'' W8'' W8'' W75'±8'' W 125'± 125'± 125'± 125'± 125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±90'±90'±142'±SS8'' S8'' SS8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' SSS8'' SSSS8'' SMANHOLERIM = 1593.74INV (30") = 1588.22MANHOLERIM = 1594.58INV (30") = 1587.91SSSSSS 8'' S 8'' S S S S8'' S 91'±142'±75'±117'±70'±75'±75'±75'±125'±125'±125'±145'±125'±125'±90'±75'±46'±144'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±125'± 125'± 125'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±75'±78'±132'±14 9 '±77'±140'± 140'± 140'± 140'±77'±77'±77'±77'±154'±139'±65'±65'±40'±91'±162'±164'±87'±139'± 12 1 '±81'±17'±65'±77'±77'±152'±78'±141'±163'±170'±170'±76'±14'±50'±170'±100'± 140'± 140'± 140'± 156'± 147'±170'±80'±77'±77'±41'±30'±77'±77'±34'±14'±71'±44'±8'±14'±31'±67'±56'±13'±78'±90'±90'±90'± 125'±125'±95'±181'±166'±96'±125'±125'±125'±124'±110'±118'±121'±125'±125'±125'±195'±75'±10'±65'±10'±65'±10'±60'±69'±90'±78'±123'±61'±3 7 '±173'±27'±27'±87'±64'±54'±60'±6 5'±60'±71'±38'±78'±78'±8'' SS8'' S8' ' W8' ' W8' ' W8' ' W8' ' S8' ' S8' ' W8' ' W8' ' W WOLF CREEK COURT WOLF CREEK CIRCLEBEAVER CREEK TRAILROCKY MOUNTAIN WAYARAPAHOE LANE 8'' W8'' W 8'' W 8'' W 8'' W 8'' W DURANGO C IRCLE PIKES PEAK C IRCLE 156'±145'±70'±125'±87'±70'±75'±41'±70'±125'±100'±125'±75'±125'±75'±126'±21'±59'±100'±125'±75'±125'±125'±100'±80'±80'±9'±54'±80'±100'±115'±126'±125'±134'±158'±121'± 63'±142'±17'±80'±80'±80'±100'± 100'±125'±80'±125'±80'±125'±80'±125'±80'±125'±41'±3 9 '± 6 4 '±129'±132'±65'±66'±78'±129'±101'±125'±125'±100'±80'±80'±80'±80'±40'±8 9 '±107'±144'±101'± 100'±80'±80'±80'±69'±5 9 '±17'±101'±8'' W 8'' W 8'' W 8'' SELDORA C IRCLE LOT 246)LOT 256)LOT 266)LOT 276)LOT 286)BLOCK 7BLOCK 10LOT 66)LOT 76)LOT 86)LOT 96)LOT 106)LOT 116)LOT 126)LOT 136)LOT 146)LOT 156)LOT 166)LOT 176)LOT 186)LOT 196)LOT 206)LOT 216)LOT 226)LOT 236)LOT 256)LOT 266)LOT 276)LOT 286)LOT 296)LOT 306)LOT 316)LOT 326)LOT 246)BLOCK 13LOT 16)LOT 26)LOT 36)LOT 46)BLOCK 11LOT 216)LOT 206)LOT 196)LOT 186)LOT 176)LOT 166)LOT 156)LOT 146)LOT 136)LOT 126)LOT 116)LOT 106)LOT 96)LOT 86)LOT 76)LOT 66)LOT 56)LOT 46)LOT 36)LOT 26)LOT 16)BLOCK 12BLOCK 14BLOCK 15LOT 296)LOT 286)LOT 276)LOT 266)LOT 256)LOT 246)LOT 236)LOT 226)LOT 216)LOT 206)LOT 196)LOT 186)LOT 176)LOT 166)LOT 156)LOT 146)LOT 136)LOT 126)LOT 116)LOT 106)LOT 96)LOT 86)LOT 76)LOT 66)LOT 56)LOT 46)LOT 36)LOT 26)LOT 16)BLOCK 16MANHOLERIM = 1595.14INV (30") = 1587.44MANHOLERIM = 1594.59INV (30") = 1587.09S8'' S8'' S197'±75'±73'±2'±75'±95'±61'±103'±30'±125'±55'±229'±26'±63'±230'±17'±125'±93'±97'±23'±SUMMIT PASSBRIGHTON ROADDURANGO PASS STEAMBOAT TRAILSNOWMASS CIR. THINLEAF CIR. W. 16TH AVE. / 469TH AVE.SILVERTON CIRCLESTEAMBOAT TRAILEAGLE AVE. CRESTED BUTTE AVE.CRESTED BUTTE CIRCLE8'' W8'' S 171'±242'±100'±125'±125'±75'±26'±75'±75'±56'±55'±28'±132'±100'±79'±97'±41'±56'± 141 '± 34'±26'±125'±125'±125'±100'±25'±31'±19'±66'±70'±70'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±125'±80'±80'±80'±80'±100'±LOT 106)LOT 96)LOT 116)LOT 126)LOT 86)LOT 76)LOT 66)LOT 56)LOT 46)LOT 36)LOT 26)LOT 16)LOT 136)LOT 196)LOT 16)LOT 26)LOT 186)LOT 36)LOT 176)LOT 166)LOT 46)LOT 156)LOT 146)LOT 136)LOT 126)LOT 116)LOT 106)LOT 96)LOT 86)LOT 76)LOT 66)LOT 56)LOT 76)LOT 66)LOT 56)LOT 86)LOT 96)LOT 46)LOT 36)LOT 26)LOT 106)LOT 116)LOT 126)LOT 16)SS S SS S 8'' S 8'' S R60'LOT 56)78'±12'±100'±125'± 125'± 125'± 125'± 142'± 125'±100'±75'±96'±99'±170'±PRELIMINARY PLATLOTS 24 TO 28 IN BLOCK 7; LOTS 6 TO 32 IN BLOCK 10; LOTS 1 TO 5 IN BLOCK 11; LOTS 1 TO 21 IN BLOCK 12; LOTS 1 TO 12 IN BLOCK 13; LOTS 1 TO 19 IN BLOCK 14;LOTS 1 TO 13 IN BLOCK 15; LOTS 1 TO 29 IN BLOCK 16; ALL OF TIMBERLINE ADDITIONIN THE S1/2 OF THE NW1/4 AND THE W1/2 OF THE NE1/4, ALL IN SECTION 34-T110N-R50W, BROOKINGS COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTALEGENDMONUMENT (FOUND)OWNER INFORMATIONSIOUX EMPIRE DEVELOPMENT CORP.603 MAIN AVENUEBROOKINGS, SD 57006EXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINESTANDARD CURB & GUTTER TO BE PLACED ON BOTHSIDES OF SUMMIT PASS AND BRIGHTON ROAD.ROLLOVER TYPE CURB & GUTTERS TO BE PLACED ONBOTH SIDES OF ALL OTHER STREETS.OWNER TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY TURN AROUND ONALL DEAD END STREETS LONGER THAN 100 FEET.STREET NOTECOVENANTS TO BE ADOPTED BY OWNERS PRIOR TOFINAL PLATTING.COVENANT NOTEGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS TO BE ADOPTED PRIORTO FINAL PLANNING.DRAINAGE NOTE2.5'14.5'30'2.5'13'13'14.5'30'8" BASE COURSE4" ASPHALTTYPICAL SECTION - LOCAL STREETS31' ROAD WIDTHANY LAND SHOWN IN THE ABOVE PRELIMINARY PLAT ANDDESIGNATED AS A STREET OR COURT IS HEREBY DEDICATED TOPUBLIC USE AS SUCH FOREVER, BUT SUCH DEDICATION SHALL NOTBE CONSTRUED TO BE A DONATION OF THE FEE OF SUCH LAND.RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION NOTENAT'L FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMMAP PANEL NO. 46011C0440CDATE: JULY 16, 2008ZONE "X" OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINZONE "A" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SUBJECT TOINUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. NOBASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINED.FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATIONEXISTING WATER LINEWEXISTING SANITARY LINES2.5'14.5'35'2.5'18'18'14.5'35'9" BASE COURSE5" ASPHALTTYPICAL SECTION - SUMMIT PASS AND BRIGHTON ROAD41' ROAD WIDTH4'4'4'4'10'10'10'10'200'100'050'100'GRID BEARINGROLLOVER CURBROLLOVER CURBFUTURE PROPERTY LINEF:\21704-02\Design Phase\Acad\Timberline Phase 4 Preliminary Plat.dwg;11/15/2017 2:03 PM www.bannerassociates.com - Toll Free: 1.855.323.6342RE V I EW ON L Y FORDESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No.:PROJECT / SHEET TITLE : REV.DATE DESCRIPTIONSHEET No. :1"1/2"0SCALE REDUCTION BARJDBBJWJLUDECEMBER 201721704-02PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMBERLINE ADDITION BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA 1 OF 2PROPOSED WATER LINE(8" UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER(8" UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)WS70' ROW60' ROWHORIZONTAL DATUM: - NAD 83 - PROJECTION: SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PLANECOORDINATES NORTH ZONEVERTICAL DATUM: - NAVD 88 - GEOID 09BASIS OF BEARING: GEODETIC NORTHALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE INTERMS OF U.S. SURVEY FEETZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYDWELLINGSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 2 UNITSSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 3 UNITSSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 4 UNITSTWO-FAMILY DWELLINGSCONDOMINIUMSTOWNHOUSES2 UNITS3 UNITS4 UNITSAPTS., CONDOMINIUMSTOWNHOUSES* 5 OR MORE UNITSOTHER ALLOWABLE USES7,5006,0005,0004,5004,9504,1003,6752,420**7,50012,00015,00018,0009,90012,30014,70016,0007,50050 FEET80 FEET100 FEET120 FEET65 FEET80 FEET95 FEET100 FEET50 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL7 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL7 FEET7 FEET7 FEET7 FEET***7 FEET***25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-2 TWO-FAMILY DISTRICT* THREE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLINGUNIT EXCLUSIVE OF REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK AREAS, ACCESS DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS.TWO-THIRDS OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE LOCATED IN A CONTINUOUS, SINGLE TRACTWHICH CONTAINS NO PORTIONS THEREOF WHICH ARE NOT CONTIGUOUS, ADJACENT AND ABUTTINGTO EITHER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OR ENTIRE LENGTH OF SAID TRACT. PARKING LOTS SHALL BESCREENED FROM SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ACCORDING TO SECTION94-401.** A MAXIMUM OF 18 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE SHALL BE ALLOWED.*** THE SIDE YARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED TO TEN FEET WHEN THE BUILDING IS THREEOR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYDWELLINGTWO DWELLING UNITS6,00050 FEET20 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-3 APARTMENT DISTRICT1,815**8,40065 FEET20 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETSINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED0 FEET SIDE YARD2 UNITS9,60075 FEET20 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL25 FEET35 FEET3 UNITS12,00090 FEET20 FEET25 FEET35 FEET4 UNITS14,000105 FEET20 FEET25 FEET35 FEETAPTS, CONDO'S, TOWNHOUSES*(3 OR MORE UNITS)10,00075 FEET20 FEET7 FEET***25 FEET45 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES6,00050 FEET20 FEET7 FEET***25 FEET45 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL* THREE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT EXCLUSIVE OF REQUIREDBUILDING SETBACK AREAS, ACCESS DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. TWO-THIRDS OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACONTINUOUS, SINGLE TRACT WHICH CONTAINS NO PORTIONS THEREOF WHICH ARE NOT CONTIGUOUS, ADJACENT AND ABUTTING TOEITHER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OR ENTIRE LENGTH OF SAID TRACT. FIFTY PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREA MAY BE USEDFOR PARKING SPACES IN EXCESS OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. PARKING LOTS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM SINGLE-FAMILY ANDTWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-401.** A MAXIMUM OF 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE SHALL BE ALLOWED.*** THE SIDE YARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED TO TEN FEET WHEN THE BUILDING IS THREE OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGTWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS7,5007,50050 FEET25 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-1C SINGLE FAMILY5,62511,25075 FEET25 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES10,00075 FEET25 FEET10 FEET25 FEET35 FEETDENSITY PER FAMILY REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO DORMATORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, NURSING HOMESOR OTHER SIMILAR GROUP QUARTERS WHERE NO COOKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUAL ROOMS.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYSINGLE-FAMILY,0 FT SIDE YARD - 2 UNITS6,0006,00050 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-1D SINGLE FAMILY6,00012,00080 FEET20 FEET0 FEET*20 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES10,00075 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES9,00075 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEET4,500* OR 6' ON NON-PARTY WALLDENSITY PER FAMILY REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO DORMATORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, NURSING HOMESOR OTHER SIMILAR GROUP QUARTERS WHERE NO COOKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUAL ROOMS. UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTTT TT30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S30'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8' ' S8'' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8' ' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S8'' S24'' ST18'' ST24'' ST 36'' ST8'' W8'' W8'' W 8'' W8'' W 8'' W 8'' W8'' W8'' W2122BLOCK 6BLOCK 817181919A1234521222316E264'N1/2 NW1/434-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: GREENWOODCEMETERY ASSOC.)BK: 119 PG 647E1635' N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. CLITES ADDN & EXCE264' BUT INCLUDING A PARCEL OF LANDABUTTING BLK 3 CLITES ADD'N TO THE EASTAND BLK 4 CLITES ADD'N TO THE WEST34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: SIOUX EMPIRE DEV. CORP)BK: 142 PG 686W338' N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. S92'34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: MICHEL H. &VICKY J. CLITES)BK: 142 PG 720N1/2 NW1/4 EXC. E1635' & EXC. E540'W878' N219' & EXC. W338' INC. S92' W338'34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: GERARD J. & JEAN MORIARTY)BK: 142 PG 644N1/2 SW1/4 34-110-50UNPLATTED(OWNER: SIOUX EMPIRE DEV. CORP)BK: 131 PG 247SE1/4 34-110-50 UNPLATTED(OWNER: DUANE G. KNUTSON)BK: 141 PG 51412'' W12'' W8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' W8'' W85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±150'± 156'± 154'± 153'±54'±85'±75'±75'±423'±75'±85'±38'±75'±75'±97'±110'±90'±90'±133'±50'±77'±85'±85'±85'±8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S 8'' S 8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S 8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S8' ' W8' ' W 8'' W 8'' W 8'' S12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W12'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8' ' W8'' W8'' W8'' W85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±90'±155'±69'±150'±85'±85'±85'±85'±85'±90'±90'±90'±86'±105'±112'±85'±85'±85'±7 0 '±159'±90'±38'±85'±26'±59'±53'±32'±118'±150'±150'±150'±150'±150'± 150'± 150'± 150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±85'±9'±76'±64'±21'±85'±29'±48'±8'±90'±21'±90'±69'±90'±148 '±151'±165'±133'±156'±134'±150'±158'±90'±86'±21'±6 2 '± 5 5 '±52'±65'±59'±25'±133'±174'±68'±77'±76'±100'±141'±77'±121'±152'±121'±150'±153'±133'±114'±141'±77'±156'±52'±57'±53'±61'±15'±141'±112'±158'±126'±108'±87'±150'±120'±134'±152'±127'±184'±83'±83'±83'±33'±93'±80'±59'±80'±61'±85'±150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±157'±2 5 '±80'±61'±80'±80'±80'±85'±112'±150'±150'±150'±104'±85'±85'±85'±71'±28'±46'±132'±84'±51'±86'±85'±85'±127'±150'±110'±150'±110'±150'±150'±150'±150'±94'±100'±100'±110'±110'±100'±100'±98'±13'±16'±149'±95'±57'±75'±55'±164'±17'±6 2 '±34'±75'±75'±112'±43'±573'±492'±18'±8'±77'±86'±45'±32'±14'±24'±52'±60'±46'±R6 0 ' R60'R60'R6 0 'R60'70'70'70'70'70'70'60'60'60' 60'60'60'60'60'60'60'60'60'70'70'70'70'70'60'±70'±60'±8'' W8'' W93'±108'±125'±125'±125'±128'±127'±133'±125'±51'±10'±30'±84'±85'±72'±38'±34'±72'±72'±72'±88'±125'±125'±125'±125'±124'±117'±121 '±124'±90'±54'±54'±18'±54'±21'±51'±24'±48'±27'±45'±72'±88'±125'±148'±60'±90'±75'±75'±38'±37'±60'±70'±60'R60'78'±733'±88'± 356'±29'±149'±8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' W 8'' S8'' S76'±85'±84'±159'±64'±60'±41'±50'±75'±63'±12'±75'±70'±125'±81'±125'±125'±50'±75'±125'±80'±99'±69'±162'±161'±105'±63'± 67'±204'±121'±50'±53'±5 8 '± 4 3'± 62'±104'±167'±188'±22'±178'±14'±81'±9'±98'±160'±160'±110'±77'±20'±145'±7 4 '± 7 0'±185'±55'±115'±202'±178'±1 7 3 ' ± 40'±173'±100'±145'±76'±20 '± 87'±160'±36'±87'±150'±106'±8'±32'±33'EXIST. ROW.35'PROPOSED ROW.1' "NA"ESMT.11,820± S.F.9,359± S.F.9,900± S.F.9,375± S.F.9,375± S.F.9,412± S.F.15,000± S.F.16,500± S.F.15,000± S.F.14,878± S.F.13,413± S.F.13,020± S.F.17,204± S.F.12,953± S.F.8,186± S.F.8,734± S.F.8,991± S.F.9,000± S.F.9,000± S.F.9,000± S.F.11,000± S.F.15,740± S.F.11,801± S.F.15,892± S.F.18,003± S.F.17,765± S.F.16,078± S.F.18,509± S.F.15,042± S.F.12,750± S.F.12,750± S.F.16,684± S.F.12,751± S.F.17,429± S.F.12,750± S.F.13,191± S.F.11,748± S.F.12,750± S.F.12,000± S.F.12,000± S.F.12,000± S.F.12,000± S.F.17,225± S.F.16,500± S.F.14,292± S.F.15,213± S.F.16,555± S.F.19,002± S.F.16,573± S.F.17,963± S.F.17,399± S.F.19,100± S.F.12,750± S.F.17,524± S.F.17,510± S.F.17,694± S.F.16,541± S.F.8,420± S.F.11,630± S.F.11,247± S.F.11,622± S.F.14,107± S.F.16,111± S.F.18,052± S.F.16,080± S.F.17,945± S.F.17,375± S.F.12,750± S.F.19,437± S.F.19,227± S.F.13,358± S.F.16,845± S.F.15,656± S.F.12,016± S.F.13,958± S.F.18,221± S.F.12,750± S.F.13,664± S.F.21,825± S.F.12,753± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.13,161± S.F.13,500± S.F.13,500± S.F.13,500± S.F.12,750± S.F.12,750± S.F.12,750± S.F.11,252± S.F.11,252± S.F.13,639± S.F.14,721± S.F.16,500± S.F.13,500± S.F.13,500± S.F.20,932± S.F.12,752± S.F.21,851± S.F.13,010± S.F.12,762± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,752± S.F.12,750± S.F.17,848± S.F.12,750± S.F.12,750± S.F.14,073± S.F.12,751± S.F.9,497± S.F.9,373± S.F.60'60'12'' W8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W80'±75'±129'±40'±37'±49'±100'±71'±119'±164'±74'±100'±125'±125'±118'±154'±40'±51'±10'±24'±53'±55'±76'±54'±5 2'±116'±138'±150'±125'±55'±75'±114'±125'±136'±123'±96'±18'±57'±174'±25'±106'±31'±37'±239'±164'±141'±50'±9'±30'±61'±17,643± S.F.10,194± S.F.14,618± S.F.15,675± S.F.15,628± S.F.9,375± S.F.9,466± S.F.11,285± S.F.12,501± S.F.13,407± S.F.18,306± S.F.12,067± S.F.11,250± S.F.9,375± S.F.9,375± S.F.9,375± S.F.12,421± S.F.RED ROCK C IRCLERED ROCK LANEELDORA CIRCLE88'±75'±75'±75'±29'±58'±125'±125'±125'±125'±73'±51'±75'±75'±75'±88'±150'±150'±150'±150'±173'±110'±114'±42'±165'±124'± 5 8 '± 5 2'±54'±54'±3 9'±56'±170'±140'± 15 9 '± 128 '±177'±190'±155'±83'±83'±62'±21'±70'±13'±106'±19'±21'±56'±15,783± S.F.20,604± S.F.13,634± S.F.14,405± S.F.20,497± S.F.13,858± S.F.12,793± S.F.17,220± S.F.12,450± S.F.12,450± S.F.17,565± S.F.12,450± S.F.75'±18'±170'±170'±170'±170'±38'±16,302± S.F.16,719± S.F.37'± 33'±42'±16'±125'±70'70'60'60'163'±138'±187'±120'± 1 9 1 '±138'±166'±150'±150'±1' "NA"ESMT.1' "NA"ESMT.STEAMBOAT TRAILSUMMIT PASSW. BRIGHTON CIRCLEBRIGHTON ROADN. EAGLE CIR.S. EAGLE CIR.DURANGO PASS DURANGO PASSBLOCK 11BLOCK 10BLOCK 12ELDORA ROADBLOCK 15BLOCK 17BLOCK 18BLOCK 19BLOCK 20201234191011121314121211102223242512345678910111213141516171819212224232725262928303125323324262728291243161523171819202122242526BLOCK 1219202122232425262728293031323334STEAMBOAT TRAILSNOWMASS CIR. THINLEAF CIR. W. 16TH AVE. / 469TH AVE.2728291314151617182120181716151413121110987654391011122187612345STEAMBOAT CIRCLE12 3434567128BLOCK 13BLOCK 14BLOCK 16261937'±81'±BLOCK 10BLOCK 7 150'± 150'±99'±24'±150'± 150'± 150'±110'±90'±150'±90'±150'±158'±1 3 0 '± 24'±172'±23'± 158'± 150'± 150'± 150'± 150'± 150'± 150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±150'±183'±8'' S8'' WE. BRIGHTON CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLATLOTS 24 TO 29 IN BLOCK 7; LOTS 1 TO 4 AND 15 TO 29 IN BLOCK 10; LOTS 6 TO 26 IN BLOCK 11; LOTS 1 TO 33 IN BLOCK 12; LOTS 1 TO 34 IN BLOCK 13; LOTS 1 TO 5IN BLOCK 14; LOTS 1 & 2 AND 10 TO 12 IN BLOCK 15; LOTS 1 TO 4 IN BLOCK 16; LOTS 1 TO 14 IN BLOCK 17; LOTS 1 TO 4 IN BLOCK 18; AND LOT 1 IN BLOCK 19; ANDBLOCK 20; ALL OF TIMBERLINE ADDITIONIN THE S1/2 OF THE NW1/4 AND THE W1/2 OF THE NE1/4, ALL IN SECTION 34-T110N-R50W, BROOKINGS COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTALEGENDMONUMENT (FOUND)OWNER INFORMATIONSIOUX EMPIRE DEVELOPMENT CORP.603 MAIN AVENUEBROOKINGS, SD 57006EXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINESTANDARD CURB & GUTTER TO BE PLACED ON BOTHSIDES OF SUMMIT PASS AND BRIGHTON ROAD.ROLLOVER TYPE CURB & GUTTERS TO BE PLACED ONBOTH SIDES OF ALL OTHER STREETS.OWNER TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY TURN AROUND ONALL DEAD END STREETS LONGER THAN 100 FEET.STREET NOTECOVENANTS TO BE ADOPTED BY OWNERS PRIOR TOFINAL PLATTING.COVENANT NOTEGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS TO BE ADOPTED PRIORTO FINAL PLANNING.DRAINAGE NOTE2.5'14.5'30'2.5'13'13'14.5'30'8" BASE COURSE4" ASPHALTTYPICAL SECTION - LOCAL STREETS31' ROAD WIDTHANY LAND SHOWN IN THE ABOVE PRELIMINARY PLAT ANDDESIGNATED AS A STREET OR COURT IS HEREBY DEDICATED TOPUBLIC USE AS SUCH FOREVER, BUT SUCH DEDICATION SHALL NOTBE CONSTRUED TO BE A DONATION OF THE FEE OF SUCH LAND.RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION NOTENAT'L FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMMAP PANEL NO. 46011C0440CDATE: JULY 16, 2008ZONE "X" OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINZONE "A" SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SUBJECT TOINUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. NOBASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINED.FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATIONEXISTING WATER LINEWEXISTING SANITARY LINES2.5'14.5'35'2.5'18'18'14.5'35'9" BASE COURSE5" ASPHALTTYPICAL SECTION - SUMMIT PASS AND BRIGHTON ROAD41' ROAD WIDTH4'4'4'4'10'10'10'10'200'100'050'100'GRID BEARINGZONING BOUNDARYROLLOVER CURBROLLOVER CURBFUTURE PROPERTY LINEF:\21704-02\Design Phase\Acad\Timberline Phase 4 Preliminary Plat.dwg;2/28/2017 8:08 AM www.bannerassociates.com - Toll Free: 1.855.323.6342RE V I EW ON L Y FORDESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No.:PROJECT / SHEET TITLE : REV.DATE DESCRIPTIONSHEET No. :1"1/2"0SCALE REDUCTION BARJDBBJWJLUFEBRUARY 201721704-02PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMBERLINE ADDITION BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA 1 OF 2PROPOSED WATER LINE(6" UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER(8" UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)WSPROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT70' ROW60' ROWHORIZONTAL DATUM: - NAD 83 - PROJECTION: SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PLANECOORDINATES NORTH ZONEVERTICAL DATUM: - NAVD 88 - GEOID 09BASIS OF BEARING: GEODETIC NORTHALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE INTERMS OF U.S. SURVEY FEETZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYDWELLINGSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 2 UNITSSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 3 UNITSSINGLE-FAMILY 0 FEET SIDEYARD 4 UNITSTWO-FAMILY DWELLINGSCONDOMINIUMSTOWNHOUSES2 UNITS3 UNITS4 UNITSAPTS., CONDOMINIUMSTOWNHOUSES* 5 OR MORE UNITSOTHER ALLOWABLE USES7,5006,0005,0004,5004,9504,1003,6752,420**7,50012,00015,00018,0009,90012,30014,70016,0007,50050 FEET80 FEET100 FEET120 FEET65 FEET80 FEET95 FEET100 FEET50 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL7 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL0 FEET OR 7 FEET ONNONPARTY WALL7 FEET7 FEET7 FEET7 FEET***7 FEET***25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET25 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-2 TWO-FAMILY DISTRICT* THREE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLINGUNIT EXCLUSIVE OF REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK AREAS, ACCESS DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS.TWO-THIRDS OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE LOCATED IN A CONTINUOUS, SINGLE TRACTWHICH CONTAINS NO PORTIONS THEREOF WHICH ARE NOT CONTIGUOUS, ADJACENT AND ABUTTINGTO EITHER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OR ENTIRE LENGTH OF SAID TRACT. PARKING LOTS SHALL BESCREENED FROM SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ACCORDING TO SECTION94-401.** A MAXIMUM OF 18 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE SHALL BE ALLOWED.*** THE SIDE YARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED TO TEN FEET WHEN THE BUILDING IS THREEOR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYDWELLINGTWO DWELLING UNITS6,00050 FEET20 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-3 APARTMENT DISTRICT1,815**8,40065 FEET20 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETSINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED0 FEET SIDE YARD2 UNITS9,60075 FEET20 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL25 FEET35 FEET3 UNITS12,00090 FEET20 FEET25 FEET35 FEET4 UNITS14,000105 FEET20 FEET25 FEET35 FEETAPTS, CONDO'S, TOWNHOUSES*(3 OR MORE UNITS)10,00075 FEET20 FEET7 FEET***25 FEET45 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES6,00050 FEET20 FEET7 FEET***25 FEET45 FEET0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL0 FEET OR 7 FEETON NON-PARTYWALL* THREE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT EXCLUSIVE OF REQUIREDBUILDING SETBACK AREAS, ACCESS DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. TWO-THIRDS OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACONTINUOUS, SINGLE TRACT WHICH CONTAINS NO PORTIONS THEREOF WHICH ARE NOT CONTIGUOUS, ADJACENT AND ABUTTING TOEITHER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OR ENTIRE LENGTH OF SAID TRACT. FIFTY PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREA MAY BE USEDFOR PARKING SPACES IN EXCESS OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. PARKING LOTS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM SINGLE-FAMILY ANDTWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-401.** A MAXIMUM OF 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE SHALL BE ALLOWED.*** THE SIDE YARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED TO TEN FEET WHEN THE BUILDING IS THREE OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGTWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS7,5007,50050 FEET25 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-1C SINGLE FAMILY5,62511,25075 FEET25 FEET7 FEET25 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES10,00075 FEET25 FEET10 FEET25 FEET35 FEETDENSITY PER FAMILY REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO DORMATORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, NURSING HOMESOR OTHER SIMILAR GROUP QUARTERS WHERE NO COOKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUAL ROOMS.ZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYSINGLE-FAMILY,0 FT SIDE YARD - 2 UNITS6,0006,00050 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-1D SINGLE FAMILY6,00012,00080 FEET20 FEET0 FEET*20 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES10,00075 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES9,00075 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEET4,500* OR 6' ON NON-PARTY WALLDENSITY PER FAMILY REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO DORMATORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, NURSING HOMESOR OTHER SIMILAR GROUP QUARTERS WHERE NO COOKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUAL ROOMS.LOT 26 TO BE USED FORDRAINAGE PURPOSES ANDWILL BE MAINTAINED BYTHE OWNER. B rook ings County, SD Timberline Prelimin a ry P la t Floodplain M ap Developed by The Schneider Corporation Par cel ID 409701105034205 Sec/T wp/Rng 34-110-50 Pr oper ty Address A lter nate ID n/a Cla ss AGD A cr eage 75.7 Owner Addr ess SIOUX EMPIRE DEVEL OP MENT C ORP PO BOX 705 BROOKINGS SD 57006 Distr ict 4001 - BROOKINGS/BROOKINGS SC H Br ief T ax Descr iption FARMLAND S 1/2 NW 1/4 EXC PL ATTED AREAS SEC 34-110-50 75.7 AC RES (Note: Not to be used on leg a l documents) Date created: 11/21/2017 Last Data Uploa ded: 11/21/2017 2:39:46 AM 829 ft Overvi ew Legend Br ookings City Limits City L imits T ow nship Boundar y Sections Parcels Roa ds Floodplain 2008 0.2 PC T ANNUAL C HANC E FL O OD HAZARD A AE X  City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0006,Version:1 Action on a Preliminary Plat for Lots 15-21, Block 11 of Bluegill Second Addition. Summary: The applicant is seeking Preliminary Plat approval for seven (7) residential lots for future development. Background: The property is located south of an extension of 23rd Street South. The general area is developing into a residential neighborhood with new homes to the west and a planned development to the north. Access will be provided by 23rd Street South and Lucerne Avenue will continue north to 20th Street South in the future. The secondary access requirement will need to be met prior to recording a final plat for this land area. Findings of Fact: 1. The Preliminary Plat is showing adequate access and right-of-way widths, block lengths, and cul-de-sac designs. The overall design meets the requirements. 2. The lot sizes and frontage requirements are met for the proposed R-1D District. 3. City services are available and will be extended to serve the property. 4. The secondary access requirement will apply at the Final Plat stage. 5. All necessary easements shall be shown on the Final Plat. City Engineer’s Comments: There are no additional drainage requirements for this plat. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat. Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes 12-5-2017 Hearing Notice Preliminary Plat City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota December 5, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #6b –Bluegill Inc and Joe & Janet Mendel have submitted a preliminary plat of Lots 15- 22, Block 4 of Block 11 of Bluegill Second Addition; Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE1/4NE1/4 excluding W44’ thereof and excluding N30’ and excluding the E300’ thereof and excluding platted areas; all in Section 1-T109N-R50W. (Johnson/Pierce) Motion to approve the preliminary plat with staff recommendations that the secondary access requirement will be met at the Final Plat stage and all necessary easements shall be shown on the Final Plat. (Rasmussen/Fargen) Amendment to the motion to state Lots 15-21 of Block 11 of Bluegill 2nd Addition. All present voted aye. AMENDMENT CARRIED. Motion as amended was voted on. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #6b –This plat is for 7 additional residential lots south of 23rd Street South for future development. Access will be provided by an extension of 23rd Street South and Lucerne Avenue will continue north to 20th Street South in the future. The secondary access requirement will need to be met prior to recording a final plat. Rasmussen noted that the drawing indicated Lots 15-21 but the notice stated Lots 15-22 . Bungard explained that Lot 22 has been pulled by the applicant. Fargen questioned if this was part of Block 4 of Block 11? Bungard explained that this was a typo and needs to be corrected. If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. NOTICE OF HEARING ON A PRELIMINARY PLAT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That Bluegill Inc. and Joe & Janet Mendel have submitted a preliminary plat of the following described real estate situated in the City of Brookings in Brookings County, South Dakota, to wit: Lots 15-21, Block 11 of Bluegill Second Addition NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City and County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner 14122311,054± S.F.BLOCK 4111'±105'±SS S S S SSS8'' S8'' S91011147,700± S.F.137,700± S.F.157,700± S.F.167,700± S.F.177,700± S.F.1810,710± S.F.218,826± S.F.2011,000± S.F.228,827± S.F.115121013BLOCK 118'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' W 8'' S 8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W 8'' W 8'' W8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' S S8'' S8'' S8'' S67898'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S ST8'' S S8'' W8'' W30'' ST 30'' S T S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' SS8'' S8'' S8'' S8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W8'' W 8'' W 8'' W1515,491± S.F.1615,290± S.F.1723,174± S.F.1823,560± S.F.1919,370± S.F.2013,729± S.F.2113,095± S.F.BLOCK 11170'±119'±110'±85'±111'±25'±141'±129'±169'±59'±182'±94'±122'±122'±85'±153'± 156'± 115'±92'±85'±29'±74' ±60'±6 2 '± 6 6'±52'±63'±130'±WS1020111619.32MH-SAN1020241619.82LP1020251622.17FHYDADDIT ION SECONDBLUEGILL 100'50'025'50'HORIZONTAL DATUM:- NAD 83- PROJECTION: SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PLANECOORDINATES NORTH ZONEVERTICAL DATUM:- NAVD 88- GEOID 09BASIS OF BEARING: GEODETIC NORTHALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE INTERMS OF U.S. SURVEY FEETGRID BEARINGLEGENDMONUMENT (FOUND)EXISTING CONTOURS1600OWNER INFORMATIONBLUEGILL, INC.611 6TH ST.BROOKINGS, SD 57006EXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEBUILDING SETBACK LINENAT'L FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAMMAP PANEL NO. 46011C0445CDATE: JULY 16, 2008ZONE "X" OUTSIDE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINFLOOD ZONE DESIGNATIONEXISTING WATER LINEWPROPOSED WATER LINEWEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEUGEEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINEUGFEXISTING TELEPHONE LINEUGTMONUMENT SET THIS SURVEY(5/8" REBAR W/STAMPEDPLASTIC CAP #9924)PRELIMINARY PLATLOTS 15 THROUGH 21 IN BLOCK 11 OF BLUEGILL SECOND ADDITION; ALL IN SEC. 1-T109N-R50W, BROOKINGS COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTAPROPOSED SANITARY LINESEXISTING SANITARY LINESNEW DROP INLETNEW SANITARY MANHOLENEW WATER VALVENEW FIRE HYDRANTNEW CURB STOPSSTEXISTING SANITARY MANHOLEEXISTING STORM MANHOLESPROPOSED STORM LINEST2.5'14.5'30'2.5'13'13'14.5'30'8" BASE COURSE4" ASPHALT31'TYPICAL SECTIONSCALE: NONEZONING REGULATIONS:SINGLE-FAMILYSINGLE-FAMILY,0 FT SIDE YARD - 2 UNITS6,0006,00050 FEET20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET35 FEETPER UNIT DENSITYSQ. FT.MIN. LOTAREA SQ. FT.MIN. LOTWIDTHMIN. FRONTYARDMIN. SIDEYARDMIN. REARYARDMAX.HEIGHTR-1D SINGLE FAMILY6,00012,00080 FEET20 FEET 0 FEET* 20 FEET 35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES10,00075 FEET 20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET 35 FEETOTHER ALLOWABLE USES9,00075 FEET 20 FEET6 FEET20 FEET 35 FEET4,500* OR 6' ON NON-PARTY WALLDENSITY PER FAMILY REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO DORMATORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, NURSING HOMESOR OTHER SIMILAR GROUP QUARTERS WHERE NO COOKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN INDIVIDUAL ROOMS.PROPOSED CONTOURS1600F:\20623-00-08\Design Phase\Acad\Bluegill 2nd Addition Blk 11 Lots 15-22 Preliminary Plat.dwg;11/27/2017 9:47 AM RE V I EW ON L Y FORDESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No.:1"1/2"0SCALE REDUCTION BARPROJECT / SHEET TITLE : REV.DATE DESCRIPTIONSHEET No. : www.bannerassociates.com - Toll Free: 1.855.323.6342JDBPJCJLUDECEMBER 201720623-00-08PRELIMINARY PLAT BLUEGILL 2ND ADDITION BROOKINGS, SD160'ROW60'ROWR60' ROW23RD ST SLUCERNE CIRCLECASCADE CIRCLE LUCERNE AVENUE ACE AVENUE City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0009,Version:1 Informational Presentation by Brookings Regional Humane Society. Summary: The Brookings Regional Humane Society wishes to provide a program and financial update to the City Council pertaining to the organization. Attachments: presentation City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Brookings Regional Humane Society AgendaBrief HistoryProgram Impact to the CommunityBRHS Operations, Budget & Financial OverviewObservations and ChallengesComparable Area Humane SocietiesRequestNext StepsQuestions Brief HistoryFounded in 1997Foster Home Program 2006 - First Location at Main & 3rdStreet 2009 - Second Location at South Main2013 - Current Location Western & Division Ave (former site of a closed veterinarian practice)* Average Annual # of Animals in System40 - 6050 - 250250 - 400450 - 600* Only Cats and Dogs All leased locations Program ImpactServes community needEducation on Spay/Neuter, assimilate animals with animal and community safety in mind, Supports other community programsSafety Town, SDSU, Community Food Pantry, Brookings School District, Volunteer Opportunities for CommunityProvide a service for City and CountyIntake unclaimed animals from Animal Control Safety Town What to do if they encounter stray animals or wildlife, etc. Students are able to meet and interact with dogs (and cats when available) during this time.During Safety Town each summer, we have been invited by the Brookings Police Department as a guest speaker on the day the children study animal safety (6 sessions each summer!).We discuss how to keep our animal friends safe, and how to stay safe around animals • what animals say when they do/do not want to be petted• meeting new animals, • when not to pet –such as when sleeping, eating, etc. Food PantryLocal K12• We operate a food pantry for local animals.• we partner with the community food pantry• Supported by local food donations.We regularly visit local schools•give presentations as requested.• allow interaction similar to safety town.Cabinets new from Lowe’s Employee Project VolunteersVolunteers are Welcome• Many younger volunteers• K12 from inside and outside of Brookings• Advance• Community Members•SDSU• Boys and Girls Scouts, 4H, etc.ADVANCE brings individuals weekly to learn job skills on site –• folding laundry, • filling litter boxes with litter, sweeping, • etc. SDSU Programs• We often participate in pre-vet seminar classes• Support the SDSU State-a-Thon for Children's Miracle Network• Bring Animals on campus to support multiple stress relief eventsofinals week osuicide awareness weekoEtc.oNew Opportunity Area Animal Intakes24.9%56.0%Antidotal correlation of increase in feline numbers occurring in lower income area’s in part from having to end (for last 3 years) of low income spay/neuter program. Financial OverviewIncome • Down Adoption FeesMedical•FlatCity/CountyOther• Up SlightlyDonations (till article)Expenses• Down None•FlatFacilitiesFundraisingOther•UpSalariesMedical $‐ $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,0002012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017BRHS IncomeAdoptionMedical SericesPublic DonationsCity/CountyFundraising/Other $‐ $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 $200,000 $220,0002012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017BRHS ExpensesMedicalFacilitiesPayrollFundraisingOther Many Groups Care about BRHSDakota Diggity Dogs - Food Vendor @ Fall Festival at Bennett BarnCarrot Seed - knife sharpeningHy-Vee - paw printsSunflower Salon - basket auctionWooden Legs - Trivia ContestBrookings Register - pet photosChoke Cherry Photography - Christmas photosScooters tip jarMission Coffee House tip jar4H - collected donationsSioux Valley school middle school penny war (over $1027 plus they volunteered for about an hour - the winning class of 20+ kids got to come)...Dacotah Bank Jean Day money for us.The high school service learning project groupRTI DonationsMrs Bezdicheck' s 4th grade class in Volga collected donationsBilly Wilburn selling collars for a cause at Found by Funky JunkBaked Potato lunch at AdvanceAnd a special thank you to all of our regular donors and supporters! Observations & ChallengesMedical Costs have increased annually. No longer see income on services provided due to loss of founder and volunteer veterinarian. This impacts availability of a number of grants.Disproportional intake of cats impact adoption fees. (harder to adopt out)Fundraising from private sources has become flat. We continue to grow and costs continue to rise (medical, payroll, etc.)Availability of consistent and reliable volunteers has gone down, driving staff costs up to manage and maintain facility.Many local charitable foundations and organizations restrict funding to specific types of organizations limiting sources.Opportunity to work toward closer relationship with the city and county.The humane society is a strongly and popularly supported community organization. Going back to 2000 when a petition of some 3000 community supporters led to a council vote for 2ndpenny funding losing 4 to 3. Comparable Humane SocietiesYankton - Heartland Humane SocietyThe Humane Society of Meeker & Kandiyohi Counties (HSKMC) Hawk CreekAberdeen Area Humane Societyhttp://anewleashonlife.net/http://thehskmc.com/http://heartlandhumanesociety.net/ ComparisonBrookings, SD Yankton, SD Aberdeen, SD Wilmar, MNApproximate Population Served35,000 25,000 40,000 65,000Own Their Building/LandNo Yes Yes YesHow AcquiredN/A Donated Donations, County some CityRelationship with City/CountyWorking Working Limited IntegratedAnimals Coming Through500 ‐ 600 500‐600 400 ‐ 500 1500 (All of AC's 2 counties)Total Annual Budget200,000$ 240,000$ $ 408,000 Labor99,000$ 137,000$ $ 236,000 FTE's126PTE's224Paid Volunteers (limited)5+ Work StudyMedical10,000$ 29,000$ $ 81,000 Medical CareVolunteers and some paid Vet supportContract 2 days / week. Local Vets struggling to find Vets.Facilities41,000$ 24,000$ $ 21,000 RevenueDonations90,000$ 156,000$ $ 170,000 City/County20,000$ 10,000$ $ 94,000 Interesting CommentsNo AC. Use training police officers for AC. They use work study students from college. Pay about 25% of cost. RequestRequest for financial support for facility & operational costs related to the increasing animals received from the city & county.Engage in developing a long term partnership plan to create a more sustainable community organization.Acknowledgement of local government to BRHS as a key part of the local community and commitment to this necessary public service. Next StepsForm task force to develop and review options to accomplish request.Come back to City and County with proposed option/s by May 2018.Task force make up to be made up based on input from city and county. ProposedMayor or Appointee (as chair)Council MemberCommissionerBRHS DirectorBRHS Board Member (with activity/research support from full board)Citizen Member (1 to 3) Questions? City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0001,Version:1 Public Hearing and Action on a request for an On-Off Malt Alcohol License for a Brewpub at 126 Main Avenue South, Sean Weber, owner, legal description: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Folsom Addition. Summary: The City of Brookings has received an application for an On-Off Sale Malt License for a Brewpub, Sean Weber, owner, 126 Main Ave. So., Brookings, South Dakota. All required documents have been submitted for this application. Background: A public hearing and action by the local governing body is required to approve all alcohol licenses. The On-Off Sale Malt License would be effective until to June 30, 2018, and then subject to an annual renewal. If approved, the application would be forwarded to the State Department of Revenue for final action and issuance of the license. Further Information: SDCL 35-2-1.2 provides all applications for retail licenses …shall be submitted to the governing board of the municipality within which the applicant intends to operate…The governing board: “shall have discretion to approve or disapprove the application depending on whether it deems the applicant a suitable person to hold such license and whether it considers the proposed location suitable.” SDCL 35-2-6.2 provides the “character” requirements for alcoholic beverage licensees: “Any license under this title…must be a person of good moral character, never convicted of a felony, and, if a corporation, the managing officers thereof must have like qualifications.” Procedure for issuance of licenses: Procedurally, SDCL 35-2-3 provides that “no license for the on or off-sale at retail of alcoholic beverages…shall be granted to an applicant for any such license, except after public hearing, upon notice.” SDCL 35-2-5 provides the procedure for the time and place of hearing and for publication of notice. If an application for a license is refused, “no further application may be received from a person until after the expiration of one year from the date of a refused application.” Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Legal Notice City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On-Off Sale Malt License – Eponymous Brewing Co., LLC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Brookings City Council in and for the City of Brookings, South Dakota, on January 9, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the Brookings City & County Government Center Chambers, 520 Third Street, will meet in regular session to consider an application for issuance of an On-Off Sale Malt License for Eponymous Brewing Co., LLC, Sean Weber and Kyle McElhany, owners, 126 Main Ave. So., Brookings, South Dakota, legal description: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Folsom Addition. At which time and place all persons interested will be given a full, fair and complete hearing thereon. Dated at Brookings, South Dakota, this 29th day of December, 2017. Shari Thornes, City Clerk Published time(s) at an approximate cost $ . City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ORD 17-026,Version:3 Second Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-026, an Ordinance amending Section 94-398 of the Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges. Summary: Staff has prepared an Ordinance Amendment to the fences, walls, and hedges section of the Zoning Ordinance. Background: Currently, the Ordinance prohibits any fence, wall, or hedge above 30 inches in the front yard. A fence with a horizontal rail design that is 70 percent open may be up to 42 inches in height. The front yard includes all the yard area between the front of the residence and the front property line. In an effort to work with property owners, staff is proposing an amendment that will allow fences, hedges, and walls in the front yard to be maximum height of 4 feet. Any fence, wall, or hedge shall not be over 30 inches in height in the sight distance triangle, unless the design is at least 70 percent open for fences. The Planning Commission tabled the item on September 5, 2017 and again on October 3, 2017. At the December 12, 2017 City Council Meeting, an amendment to the ordinance was made by Council Member Wendell, seconded by Council Member Tilton Byrne, to separate hedges from walls and fences, using the same language as stated in A1, and to change the maximum hedge height to 72” when located between the front lot line and principal building, with a maximum hedge height of 30” if located within the sight triangle. Additional edits were required to Section (b) Exceptions, to eliminate conflicting language with the amendment. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 8-1 to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment on November 7, 2017. Attachments: Ordinance - Clean Copy posted January 2, 2017 Ordinance - Marked Copy posted January 2, 2017 Ordinance - Clean Copy Ordinance - Marked Copy Planning Commission Minutes 9/5/2017, 10/3/2017, 11/7/2017 Planning Commission Hearing Notice Comparison Chart City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. 17-026 An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Brookings and pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges for the purpose of administration of the Zoning Ordinance Be it ordained by the Council of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota: that Chapter 94, Zoning, Section 94-394, Subsection (a) and (b) shall be amended as follows: I. Sec. 94-398. - Fences, walls, hedges (a)Regulations generally. 1. Regulations regarding fences and walls are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy fencing utilizing solid board or other similarly designed fences and walls shall not exceed 48 inches in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. Fences and walls on any other part of a lot may not exceed six feet in height when located within the minimum required setback area. The height of such walls and fences shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such fence or wall. a. Fences, walls, and hedges, shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. b. Fences with a design that results in 70 percent or more of open space from the grade to the top may be permitted in the required site triangle. 2. Regulations regarding hedges are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy hedges shall not exceed six feet in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. The height of such hedges shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such hedge. a. Hedges shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. (b)Exceptions. 1.Fences and walls up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting an arterial street where: a.The lot is a double frontage lot; and b.The lot is not adjacent to an alley which accesses onto the arterial street; and c.The lot is not a corner lot; and d.No driveways exit onto the arterial street; and e.The fence or wall is set back four or more feet from the front property line. Page 2 2.Fences and walls up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting a local or collector street where: a.The lot is a double frontage lot; and b.The fence orwall meets the minimum required setback of the district the lot is located in. (c) In all business districts, fences up to eight feet in height may be erected within 20 feet of any front property line and up to any side or rear property line. Exception: Fences shall not be erected between a lot line and any areas required to be landscaped. This provision shall not prohibit the screening of outdoor storage of materials and inventory as required by other sections of this chapter. Amend Section 94-1. Definitions. Hedges:a fence or boundary formed by a dense row of shrubs, bushes, or low lying trees. II. Any and all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PUBLISHED: CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA ___________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ City Clerk Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. 17-026 An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Brookings and pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges for the purpose of administration of the Zoning Ordinance Be it ordained by the Council of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota: that Chapter 94, Zoning, Section 94-394, Subsection (a) and (b) shall be amended as follows: I. Sec. 94-398. - Fences, walls, hedges (a)Regulations generally. 1. Regulations regarding fences, and walls, and hedges are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy fencing utilizing solid board or other similarly designed fences, and walls and hedges shall not exceed 48 inches in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. Fences and walls on any other part of a lot may not exceed six feet in height when located within the minimum required setback area. The height of such walls and fences shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such fence or wall. a. Fences, walls, and hedges, shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. b. Fences with a design that results in 70 percent or more of open space from the grade to the top may be permitted in the required site triangle. 2. Regulations regarding hedges are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy hedges shall not exceed six feet in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. The height of such hedges shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such hedge. a. Hedges shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. (b)Exceptions. 1.Fences, and walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting an arterial street where: a.The lot is a double frontage lot; and b.The lot is not adjacent to an alley which accesses onto the arterial street; and c.The lot is not a corner lot; and d.No driveways exit onto the arterial street; and e.The fence, or wall or hedge is set back four or more feet from the front property line. Page 2 2.Fences, and walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting a local or collector street where: a.The lot is a double frontage lot; and b.The fence, or wall or hedge meets the minimum required setback of the district the lot is located in. (c) In all business districts, fences up to eight feet in height may be erected within 20 feet of any front property line and up to any side or rear property line. Exception: Fences shall not be erected between a lot line and any areas required to be landscaped. This provision shall not prohibit the screening of outdoor storage of materials and inventory as required by other sections of this chapter. Amend Section 94-1. Definitions. Hedges:a fence or boundary formed by a dense row of shrubs, bushes, or low lying trees. II. Any and all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PUBLISHED: CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA ___________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ City Clerk Page 1 Ordinance 17-026 An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Brookings and pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges for the purpose of administration of the Zoning Ordinance Be It Ordained by the Council of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota: that Chapter 94, Zoning, Section 94-394, Subsection (a) and (b) shall be amended as follows: I. Sec. 94-398. - Fences, walls, hedges (a)Regulations generally.Regulations regarding fences, walls, and hedges are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy fencing utilizing solid board or other similarly designed fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 48 inches in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. Fences and walls on any other part of a lot may not exceed six feet in height when located within the minimum required setback area. The height of such walls and fences shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such fence or wall. (1) Fences, walls, and hedges, shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. (2) Fences with a design that results in 70 percent or more of open space from the grade to the top may be permitted in the required site triangle. (b)Exceptions. (1) Fences, walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting an arterial street where: a. The lot is a double frontage lot; and b. The lot is not adjacent to an alley which accesses onto the arterial street; and c.The lot is not a corner lot; and d. No driveways exit onto the arterial street; and e. The fence, wall or hedge is set back four or more feet from the front property line. (2) Fences, walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting a local or collector street where: a. The lot is a double frontage lot; and b. The fence, wall or hedge meets the minimum required setback of the district the lot is located in. (c) In all business districts, fences up to eight feet in height may be erected within 20 feet of any front property line and up to any side or rear property line. Exception: Fences shall not be erected between a lot line and any areas required to be landscaped. This provision shall not prohibit the screening of outdoor storage of materials and inventory as required by other sections of this chapter. Page 2 Amend Section 94-1. Definitions. Hedges: a fence or boundary formed by a dense row of shrubs, bushes, or low lying trees. II. Any or all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading:November 28, 2017 Public Hearing and Adoption:December 12, 2017 Published:December 15, 2017 CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD _________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk Page 1 Ordinance 17-026 An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Brookings and pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges for the purpose of administration of the Zoning Ordinance Be It Ordained by the Council of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota: that Chapter 94, Zoning, Section 94-394, Subsection (a) and (b) shall be amended as follows: I. Sec. 94-398. - Fences, walls, hedges (a)Regulations generally.Regulations regarding fences, walls, and hedges are as follows: In all residential districts and on lots used principally for residential purposes in any business or industrial district, privacy fencing utilizing solid board or other similarly designed fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 48 inches 30 inches in height when located between the front lot line and the principal building. Fences with a horizontal rail design that results in 70 percent or more of open space from grade to the top of the top rail may extend 42 inches above the adjacent grade measured from grade to the top of the top horizontal rail. Fences and walls on any other part of a lot may not exceed six feet in height when located within the minimum required setback area. The height of such walls and fences shall be determined by measurement from the ground level at the lowest grade within three feet of either side of such fence or wall. (1)Fences, walls, and hedges, shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height in the sight triangle as referenced in Section 94-407. (2)Fences with a design that results in 70 percent or more of open space from the grade to the top may be permitted in the required site triangle. (b)Exceptions. (1) Fences, walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting an arterial street where: a. The lot is a double frontage lot; and b. The lot is not adjacent to an alley which accesses onto the arterial street; and c.The lot is not a corner lot; and d. No driveways exit onto the arterial street; and e. The fence, wall or hedge is set back four or more feet from the front property line. (2) Fences, walls and hedges up to six feet in height may be placed in a front yard opposite the street address of a lot abutting a local or collector street where: a. The lot is a double frontage lot; and b. The fence, wall or hedge meets the minimum required setback of the district the lot is located in. (c) In all business districts, fences up to eight feet in height may be erected within 20 feet of any front property line and up to any side or rear property line. Exception: Fences shall not be erected between a lot line and any areas required to be landscaped. This Page 2 provision shall not prohibit the screening of outdoor storage of materials and inventory as required by other sections of this chapter. Amend Section 94-1. Definitions. Hedges: a fence or boundary formed by a dense row of shrubs, bushes, or low lying trees. II. Any and all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading:November 28, 2017 Public Hearing and Adoption:December 12, 2017 Published:December 15, 2017 CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD ________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota September 5th, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Absent was Greg Fargen. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Mike McClemans, John Mills, Donald Denure, David Jones, Rick Ribstein, Larry Fjeldos, Kelan Bludorn, Mary and Orren Erickson, Kathy Larson, John Kratochvil, Tom Becker, Shawn Weber, Josh Westwick, Stacy Davis, Jolane Tomhave, and others. Item #8c – The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-398 pertaining to Fences, Walls, and Hedges. (Tornquist/Aiken) Motion to approve the ordinance amendments. (Gregg/Rasmussen) Motion to table. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #8c –Staff has reviewed the current ordinance and is proposing amendments to the ordinance to try to balance neighborhood privacy needs with safety concerns keeping a clear sight distance triangle. Currently fences, walls and hedges can only be 30 inches in height in the front yard. Unless it is a slotted fence that is 70 percent open, then the height restriction is 42 inches in the front yard. Staff is proposing an amendment to allow fences, walls and hedges to be a maximum height of 4 feet in the front yard. However in the sight distance triangle, the fence, wall or hedge will need to be 30 inches or less unless it is 70 percent open then it may be up to 42 inches in height. Heuton clarified that the site triangle includes the right-of-way intersections and the alley. Josh Westwick, 502 9th Avenue, received a letter from the City regarding the height of his hedge. He purchased this house a year ago and had/has never heard of this issue until recently. He feels that the amendments to the site triangle ordinance should itself take care of the safety issue. Westwick has spoken with several residents in Brookings they were never aware of the ordinance or they had not yet been contacted by the City that they needed to take care of the hedge in their yard. Westwick is in favor of an amendment to this ordinance. However, he feels that the amendment being proposed for Section 94-407, Intersection Safety Zones, addresses the safety issues that City Staff are concerned about. He also feels that the word “hedges” should be removed entirely from Section 94-397 upon the approval of the amendments to the site triangle ordinance Section 94-407. Westwick feels that if a resident abides to the site triangle ordinance, then the hedge height in a front yard becomes irrelevant and should not be a concern to the city unless the hedge is hanging over the sidewalk. And if a height needs to be attached to the ordinance, then he feels that the height should be 72 inches. Westwick feels the current ordinance and even the proposed amendments have a negative impact on his quality of life. He also feels that the lowering of the hedges will have a negative impact on his residence. Westwick feels that there are benefits to hedges. They provide greenery, oxygen, privacy, they reduce noise and provide habitat for birds and other species. Hedges also provide charm and character to properties in the historic districts. Westwick was told by city staff that the current ordinance mandates that homeowners are not allowed to have plants, shrubs or bushes that are more than 30 inches in height in front of the house line, regardless if it is a hedge or not. He asked if this is currently included in the hedge ordinance. Struck stated that vegetation of fences, walls and hedges pertains to only the front yard. So if you have landscaping materials, such as taller plants or grasses, they are not considered a hedge. Westwick asked if a standalone bush was considered part of a hedge. Struck stated that they look at the continuous vegetation that could create a solid structure. Westwick wondered if homeowners are allowed to plant gardens in their front yards, and if so, is this attached to the hedge ordinance. Struck stated that they are allowed at this time as long as it doesn’t fit under the definition of a hedge. Westwick questioned what the definition of a low lying tree was. Struck explained that if someone were to plant evergreens at a distance that could grow together, this would be considered a hedge. Westwick feels that the hedges on his property are not a safety concern and he shouldn’t be required to lower his hedges, other than those that are in the site distance triangle. Heuton asked if there would be a ‘grandfathering’ process with this. Struck explained that the City will not be going through a grandfathering process as it would be nearly impossible to keep track of this. Drew asked Westwick what he thinks would be a good height for hedges. Westwick feels that 48 inches is too low and that 72 inches would be a good height in areas of the yard that do not affect the safety of others. Jolane Tomhave also received a letter from the City. She appreciates the safety side of the ordinance at the site triangles and near the driveways. She hadn’t thought about the safety side of it and she appreciates that the city brought this to her attention. She has trimmed the hedges on her property in the site areas but doesn’t agree with the ordinance for the remaining hedges. Staci Davis, 510 9th Ave, explained that they have a hedge that goes along an alley way between her house and the alley. When they purchased the house 4 years ago, they weren’t aware of this ordinance. Since they purchased their property, they have trimmed and lowered the hedge, but she doesn’t agree with a height restriction to hedges unless it is in the site triangle. Tomhave stated that there are benefits to having greenery. The greenery does provide as a buffer from sound and dust. But also provides a habitat for birds. She would like to know what the benefits to cutting down the hedges would be. She would like to see that the hedges remain taller, other than in the safety areas. Heuton has always been concerned that fences, walls, and hedges have always been lumped together. Tornquist wonders why the ordinance doesn’t state anything regarding hedges hanging over the sidewalk. Struck explained that this is enforced in a different ordinance. Pierce is empathetic to the vegetation concerns, but the safety concerns are a bigger issue to her. Drew asked where the City Staff came up with the 48 inches height. Struck explained that City staff completed research on other cities to see what they were using. Struck also noted that some best practice examples noted that the lower height was a benefit to neighbors as they could see into their neighbors yard and notice if things were out of the ordinary. He also noted that hedges should not be removed from the ordinance. Hedges can become a bigger barrier than a fence or wall. Bungard stated that the 48 inch rule in the front yard is a pretty common height nationwide. Pierce commented that the ordinance, the way it is written, could be interpreted differently. Aiken is concerned about the properties that may have a deep, front yard. These hedges may not be a safety concern on these lots, and these people may have to remove a large amount of their hedge and it wouldn’t be necessary. Tornquist asked how tall a fence or hedge could be if it wasn’t in the front yard. Bungard explained that as long as the fence or hedge is not in the setback area, then it can be at any height that the property owner would like. Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota October 3, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, October 3, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Absent was Alan Johnson. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Ryan McKnight, Jeremy Scott, Blake Hoffman, Nacasius Ujah, Matt Anderson, Jordan McCaskill, Joseph Mohr, Tanner Nelson, Jacob Rohlik, Ryan Schiller, Joshua Westwick, Jolynn Tomhave, and others. Item #6a - The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-398 pertaining to Landscaping. (Gregg/Aiken) Motion to remove from the table. All in favor. (Aiken/Fargen) Motion to approve the amendments. (Rasmussen/Tornquist) Motion to table. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #6b –Bungard explained that these amendments pertain to Fences, Walls and Hedges in the front yard. Currently there is a 30 inch height maximum in the front yard and the amendment would increase the height to 48 inches. Additionally, horizontal rail design language would be removed from this ordinance. So long as these fences, walls, or hedges do not get into the sight triangle. And fences with a design that would results in 70% or more opening from the grade to the top would be allowed in the sight triangle. Anything within the sight triangle would have a height maximum of 30 inches. Heuton read a letter from Kelly Chromey, a city resident, asking the Planning Commission to consider increasing the height of hedges to 72 inches. She feels that hedges are aesthetically pleasing and provide refuge from wind and rain for wildlife. Hedges also play an important role in minimizing soil loss, regulating water supply and reducing pollution. Chromey feels that the hedges also prevent pedestrians from encroaching upon people’s property. And they provide privacy to property owners. Heuton read a letter from Blake Erickson who is a lifelong resident of Brookings. Erickson feels that the height of the hedges should be increased to 72 inches. He is a runner and has always enjoyed the hedges and doesn’t feel that the hedges are a safety concern. Erickson feels that there are other places in town that have equipment parked along their property lines and at intersections that obstructs the view for pedestrians. Erickson does agree that the hedges in the sight triangles should be cut to the 30 inches for safety reasons. Tornquist read a letter from Jolynn and Thomas Tomhave. The Tomhave’s appreciate that the commission is considering an increase in the height of hedges, with the exception to the sight lines. Tomhave’s feel that the hedges provide a much needed barrier from downtown foot traffic, shade, lush habitat for birds and other species, and beauty to neighborhoods. Tornquist read letter from Rebecca Kuehl Hybbert who would also like to see the hedge height be increased to 72 inches. She feels that the higher hedges will help preserve their properties. Tornquist also read a letter from Karla Hunter who is in support of the increase to 72 inches for hedges, as long as street and sidewalk traffic safety is taken in to consideration. 3 reasons that she feels the height should be increased are: 1. Privacy 2. Individuality of expression and citizen’s rights 3. Greenery is beautiful and provides for biodiversity for mammals and plentiful greener. Josh Westwick, 502 9th Ave – He recalls at the end of a previous meeting that City Staff indicated that if the motion to amend the ordinance amendment, then a discussion could be held to discuss removing hedges from this ordinance. However, the agenda item tonight does not reflect any changes from the previous meeting. He is requesting that the commission again table this item and consider removing the hedges. Westwick feels that hedges of 72 inches should be allowed on private property for the following reasons: Hedges provide residential privacy. Hedges reduce noise. Westwick noted that there is heavy foot traffic by his house during some nights and weekends and the hedges absorb some of the noise. Hedges provide safety and security. Westwick has a garden area that is susceptible to vandalism, theft and damage, however he feels that hedges help keep people on the sidewalk and off of personal property. Hedges provide charm, character and are aesthetically pleasing. Josh feels that Brookings shouldn’t try to be like everybody else and change the ordinance to 48 inches, reduction and removal of hedges will negatively affect the beauty of Brookings. Hedges serve as a natural habitat for birds butterflies and other species. Hedges have not proven to be a serious safety concern if not located within the safety zones. Westwick recalled city staff commenting that they haven’t received complaints regarding hedge heights outside of the safety zones. Westwick feels that if citizen’s haven’t complained about the hedge height for years, then residents aren’t concerned if the hedges are 72 inches tall. Reducing the hedge height will impact curb appeal and decrease property values. This is unfair and is an injustice to him and others with hedges on their properties. Westwick found that the American Planners Association stated that if communities are considering prohibiting or restricting fences, they need to also look at the benefits and positive values of hedges and fences. Additionally, he has found that there are other cities that allow for different regulations for fences and hedges. And if the fences and hedges can be separate in other cities, then they should be able to be separated here also. He would like the commission to keep the property owners in mind when making a decision on this ordinance. Westwick would like to ask that the commission consider an alternative definition to hedge in the ordinance. Similar details to another city could help define this. Jolynn Tomhave stated that they have cut down 45 feet of hedge and they wouldn’t want to cut down anymore. She feels that a 72 inch hedge height should be allowed. She left the previous Planning Commission meeting thinking that there was new thought and new movement toward a 72 inch hedge other than in the safety zones. Pierce feels that Fences, Walls and Hedges being in the same ordinance is a concern. She isn’t in favor of fences and walls being taller. But a taller hedge does have benefits and they are aesthetically pleasing. Fargen wondered if they could remain in one ordinance, but break out the items. Drew feels that a clear definition of “hedge” and “fence” needs to be made. Heuton doesn’t have an issue with a 72 inch hedge or bush in the front yard. But walls or fences are a concern to him at 72 inches in height. Aiken also agrees that a 72 inch high hedge, as long as it doesn’t affect the safety of anyone, isn’t a concern. But a clear definition of what a hedge is would be beneficial. Pierce feels that fences and walls could be left at the 30 inch height maximum. Bungard stated that she has heard concerns from citizen’s that 30 or 36 inches for fences and walls isn’t high enough and that 48 inches should be allowed. Gregg and Heuton feel that 48 inches is a good height. Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota November 7, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, November 7, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, David Jones, Joshua Westwick, and others. Item #5c – The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-398 pertaining to Fences, Walls, and Hedges. (Rasmussen/Drew) Motion to remove from the table. (Rasmussen/Drew) Motion to approve the ordinance amendments. Heuton voted no. All others voted yes. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #5c –Heuton received a letter in favor of the 6 foot hedge. Josh Westwick spoke in favor of the 48 inch hedge height. He recognizes that the 48 inch height can be sufficient. He would like the Commission to approve the 48 inches and not keep it at 30 inches. He also would like the Commission to better define the hedge definition. Rasmussen called the question and there was no further discussion. If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Published ______ time(s) at an approximate cost of $ _____________. NOTICE OF HEARING UPON A CHANGE IN ZONE REGULATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-398, pertaining to Fences, Walls, and Hedges. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City and County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. Dated this 25th day of August, 2017. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner Municipality Regulations for Fences, Walls, Hedges Sioux Falls 4’ fence in front yard;no more than 30% solid design if within 30’ from intersection along property lines Aberdeen 3’ for hedges within 50’ of intersection at curbline & 3’ for solid fence within 35’ of intersection and 15’ for driveway at property lines Rapid City 4’ for fences in front yard; fences and hedges not more than 2.5’in sight triangle Brandon 4’ fence in front yard Huron 4’ fence in front yard; no fence or plant material taller than 1’ in sight triangle (12’ for streets/alleys & 8’ for driveways); Hedges in boulevard /parking areas not more than 30” measured from street gutter level Pierre 48” fence in front yard; fences, walls and hedges at 30” in sight triangle (25’ for streets and 15’ for intersection of street and alley measured at property line) Yankton 3’ for fences, walls, structure, planting of foliage with sight triangle (30’ from curbline of intersecting streets) Mankato, MN 4’ fence in front yard; fences, walls, shrubbery, or any visual obstruction shall not be over 30” in sight triangle as measured 25’ from right-of-way line Madison, WI 4’ for fences in front yard; nothing between 30”and 10’ in sight triangle (25’ for streets and 10’ for alleys and driveways measured at property line); Fences 66% open are exempt City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ORD 17-031,Version:2 Second Reading and Action on Ordinance 17-031, an Ordinance Revising Article IV, Site Runoff and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Summary: This ordinance pertains to the operation and maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the state, such as drainage facilities and detention ponds. Background: The South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources provided an annual review of the City of Brookings Small MS4 Storm Water Management Program which is related to water quality. SDDENR commented that the City needed requirements to ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs, such as drainage facilities and detention ponds. The City of Brookings requires the individual BMP property owner to maintain each specific BMP, such as mowing, sediment control and other maintenance. The Engineering Department staff reviewed the current ordinance pertaining to maintenance of BMPs and updated the ordinance to be more specific to meet the DENR requirement. This ordinance will amend Division Post Construction Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Article IV, Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, by adding a section to the ordinance to clarify operation and maintenance requirements. Fiscal Impact: None. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Ordinance - clean copy Ordinance - marked copy City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Ordinance 17-031 An Ordinance Revising Article IV, Site Runoff and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Be It Ordained by the City of Brookings that Section 72-5 - Definitions, of Article 1-In General, and Division 2 - Post Construction Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Article IV - Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings be amended to read as follows: Sec. 72-5. – Definitions. Best Management Practices (BMPs)means various activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures and other management practices, either structural or non- structural, for the purpose of preventing or reducing the discharge of pollutants to the municipal stormwater system and/or waters of the state. Examples of structural BMPs may include permanent detention or retention ponds constructed to control and minimize stormwater runoff rates and volumes and to prevent, control, and minimize stormwater pollution. Non-structural BMPs may include ongoing treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or water disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage. BMPs may also be temporary, such as BMPs put into place during construction and maintained until the site is permanently stabilized. Sec. 72-75. – Operation and Maintenance of BMPs Permanent structural and/or nonstructural BMPs shall be implemented to control and minimize stormwater runoff rates and volumes and to prevent, control, and minimize stormwater pollutants as required in this Chapter. (1) It is a violation for any owner to improperly construct or operate or fail to maintain the proper function of privately owned structural BMPs. Maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, removing trash and debris, reseeding, mowing, pest control, removing sediment accumulation, removing vegetation, replacing filter media, and repairing eroded areas. (2) It is a violation for any owner to place or deposit debris, yard waste, garbage, or other materials that are incompatible with the function of the BMPs, or permit such items to be deposited in any manner on privately owned structural BMPs. (3) The owner shall immediately notify the City Engineer of any discharge of a pollutant, debris, yard waste, garbage, excessive sediment, or materials incompatible with BMPs, including from a privately owned BMP, into the City’s municipal storm water drainage system. This notification shall include the location of the discharge, type of pollutant, concentration and volume, if known, and corrective actions taken by the owner. The owner shall document and submit to the City Engineer all pertinent information. (4) In the case of any physical failure, including, but not limited to, structural, equipment, or media failure (e.g., failure of BMP fixtures including, but not limited to, screens, riprap, aerators, design features, and fences) of a privately owned structural BMP that may cause pollutants to enter the City’s municipal stormwater system, the owner shall immediately notify the City Engineer of the incident. This notification shall include the location failure, type and extent of the failure, if known, and corrective actions taken by the owner. The owner shall document and submit to the City Engineer all pertinent information. If privately owned BMPs are constructed, operated, and/or maintained in a manner that results in discharge of pollutants to the City's storm water drainage system, the City may require the owner to implement additional structural and/or nonstructural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the City’s storm water drainage system. II. Any or all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading: December 12, 2017 Second Reading and Adoption: January 9, 2018 Published: January 12, 2018 CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: Shari Thornes, City Clerk Ordinance 17-031 An Ordinance Revising Article IV, Site Runoff and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings and Pertaining to Operation and Maintenance of Best Management Practices in the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Be It Ordained by the City of Brookings that Section 72-5 - Definitions, of Article 1-In General, and Division 2 - Post Construction Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Article IV - Site Runoff Erosion and Sediment Control, of Chapter 72, Storm Drainage, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Brookings be amended to read as follows: Sec. 72-5. – Definitions. Best Management Practices (BMPs)means various activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures and other management practices, to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. BMP's also include treatment requirements, operating procedures and practices to control construction site runoff, sediment, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal or drainage from raw material storage., either structural or non-structural, for the purpose of preventing or reducing the discharge of pollutants to the municipal stormwater system and/or waters of the state. Examples of structural BMPs may include permanent detention or retention ponds constructed to control and minimize stormwater runoff rates and volumes and to prevent, control, and minimize stormwater pollution. Non-structural BMPs may include ongoing treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or water disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage. BMPs may also be temporary, such as BMPs put into place during construction and maintained until the site is permanently stabilized. Sec. 72-75. – Operation and Maintenance of BMPs Permanent structural and/or nonstructural BMPs shall be implemented to control and minimize stormwater runoff rates and volumes and to prevent, control, and minimize stormwater pollutants as required in this Chapter. (1) It is a violation for any owner to improperly construct or operate or fail to maintain the proper function of privately owned structural BMPs. Maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, removing trash and debris, reseeding, mowing, pest control, removing sediment accumulation, removing vegetation, replacing filter media, and repairing eroded areas. (2) It is a violation for any owner to place or deposit debris, yard waste, garbage, or other materials that are incompatible with the function of the BMPs, or permit such items to be deposited in any manner on privately owned structural BMPs. (3) The owner shall immediately notify the City Engineer of any discharge of a pollutant, debris, yard waste, garbage, excessive sediment, or materials incompatible with BMPs, including from a privately owned BMP, into the City’s municipal storm water drainage system. This notification shall include the location of the discharge, type of pollutant, concentration and volume, if known, and corrective actions taken by the owner. The owner shall document and submit to the City Engineer all pertinent information. (4) In the case of any physical failure, including, but not limited to, structural, equipment, or media failure (e.g., failure of BMP fixtures including, but not limited to, screens, riprap, aerators, design features, and fences) of a privately owned structural BMP that may cause pollutants to enter the City’s municipal stormwater system, the owner shall immediately notify the City Engineer of the incident. This notification shall include the location failure, type and extent of the failure, if known, and corrective actions taken by the owner. The owner shall document and submit to the City Engineer all pertinent information. If privately owned BMPs are constructed, operated, and/or maintained in a manner that results in discharge of pollutants to the City's storm water drainage system, the City may require the owner to implement additional structural and/or nonstructural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the City’s storm water drainage system. II. Any or all ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading: December 12, 2017 Second Reading and Adoption: January 9, 2018 Published: January 12, 2018 CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: Shari Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ORD 17-032,Version:2 Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-032, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of S½ of the NW¼ of Section 34-T110N-R50W from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District (Timberline Addition). Summary: The applicant is seeking approval of a residential rezoning request to match a new preliminary plat layout in the Timberline Addition. Background: The owner is proposing to rezone land to align with a new preliminary plat design and remedy split zoning on all proposed lots. The property is currently vacant and is directly west of Timberline Addition. The land was originally zoned in August 2016; however, the preliminary design has changed making it necessary to slightly revise the zoning. The applicant is not proposing any new residential zoning districts rather just shifting the boundaries of the existing districts. Findings of Fact: 1.The Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan shows this general area as residential. 2.City utilities are available to the property. 3.The area is a logical extension of residential land use and fits the current development pattern. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the rezoning request. Attachments: Ordinance Notice Planning Commission Minutes 12/5/2017 Rezoning Map Current Zoning Map City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Ordinance 17-032 An Ordinance to Change the Zoning within the City of Brookings Be It Ordained by the City of Brookings, South Dakota: Section 1. That the real estate situated in the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota, described as follows, to-wit: A Portion of the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of S½ of the NW¼ of Section 34- T110N-R50W, be and the same is hereby reclassified from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District. (Timberline Addition) In accordance with Section 94-7 of Article I of Ordinance 17-13 of the Code of Ordinances of Brookings, South Dakota, as said districts are more fully set forth and described in Articles III and IV, Chapter 94 of Ordinance No. 17-13 of the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Section 2. The permitted use of the property heretofore described be and the same is hereby altered and changed in accordance herewith pursuant to said Ordinance No. 17-13 of the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Section 3. All sections and ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading: December 12, 2017 Second Reading and Adoption: January 9, 2018 Published: CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD ________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Published ______ time(s) at an approximate cost of $ _____________. NOTICE OF HEARING UPON PETITION TO REZONE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That Sioux Empire Development Corporation submitted a petition to rezone the following described real estate in the City of Brookings and Brookings County, South Dakota: A Portion of the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of S½ of the NW¼ of Section 34-T110N-R50W from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City & County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. Dated this 24 th day of November, 2017. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota December 5, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #5a –Sioux Empire Development Corporation submitted a petition to rezone the West 1,029’ of the East 1,515’ of S1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 34-T110N-R50W from Residence R-1C Single Family District to Residence R-3 Apartment District; Residence R-1C to Residence R-2 Two-Family District; Residence R-3 Apartment District to Residence R-1C Single Family District; and Residence R-2 Two-Family District to Residence R-1C Single Family District. (Gregg/Fargen) Motion to approve the petition to rezone. (Tornquist/Aiken) Amendment to the motion to change the zoning on the southern end to R- 3. All present voted aye. AMENDMENT CARRIED. Motion as amended was voted on. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #5a –The owner is proposing to rezone land to align with a new preliminary plat design in the Timberline addition to match a new preliminary plat layout. This rezone will also remedy split zoning on all proposed lots. City utilities are available to this area. Tornquist wondered why the southern area is being requested to be rezoned to R-2 when the neighboring zone is R-3. Justin Bucher, Banner Associates, explained that there was a typo on the map and the zoning should be R-3 for this. City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ORD 17-033,Version:2 Public Hearing and Action on Ordinance 17-033, an Ordinance rezoning a portion of Bluegill Second Addition; a portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE ¼ NE ¼ excluding W 44’ thereof and exluding N 30’ and excluding the E 300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N- R50W from an A, Agricultural District to Residence R-1D Single Family District. Summary: The applicant is proposing to rezone a portion of land to R-1D to accommodate future residential development in the Bluegill Second and Third Addition. Background: The vacant property is currently zoned agricultural and is immediately east of Bluegill 2nd Addition. The applicant has also proposed a Preliminary Plat for this land area showing low density single- family residential lots. Findings of Fact: 1.The Future Land Use Map contained in the Comprehensive Plan shows the area as residential. 2.Utilities are available to the property. 3.Future residential development in this area fits the existing development pattern and is a logical expansion of residential property. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the rezoning request. Attachments: Ordinance Planning Commission Minutes 12/5/2017 Planning Commission Hearing Notice Rezoning Map City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Ordinance 17-033 An Ordinance to Change the Zoning within the City of Brookings Be It Ordained by the City of Brookings, South Dakota: Section 1. That the real estate situated in the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota, described as follows, to-wit: A Portion of Bluegill Second Addition; A Portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE ¼ NE ¼ excluding W 44’ thereof and exluding N 30’ and excluding the E 300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N-R50W, be and the same is hereby reclassified from from an A, Agricultural District to Residence R-1D Single Family District. In accordance with Section 94-7 of Article I of Ordinance 17-13 of the Code of Ordinances of Brookings, South Dakota, as said districts are more fully set forth and described in Articles III and IV, Chapter 94 of Ordinance No. 17-13 of the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Section 2. The permitted use of the property heretofore described be and the same is hereby altered and changed in accordance herewith pursuant to said Ordinance No. 17-13 of the City of Brookings, South Dakota. Section 3. All sections and ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading: December 12, 2017 Second Reading and Adoption: Published: CITY OF BROOKINGS, SD ________________________ Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota December 5, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #5b –Bluegill Inc and Joe and Janet Mendel submitted a petition to rezone a portion of Bluegill Second Addition; A Portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE1/4NE1/4 excluding W44’ thereof and excluding the N30’ and excluding the E300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N-R50W from an A, Agricultural District to Residence R-1D Single Family District. (Fargen/Johnson) Motion to approve the petition to rezone. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #5b –This is a request to rezone a portion of land to R-1D. The property is currently zoned Agricultural and is immediately east of Bluegill 2nd Addition. Along with this rezoning request, there will also be a preliminary plat that will be acted on tonight. Rasmussen asked what the difference is between R-1C and R-1D. Bungard explained that R-1D allows for smaller lots and lesser setbacks. Tornquist questioned the large lot size that the applicant is requesting the R-1D District which allows for smaller lots. Bungard explained that these lots are larger than typical R-1D Districts lots, but by using the R-1D zoning, a larger house will be able to be put on these lots because of the smaller setbacks. If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Published ______ time(s) at an approximate cost of $ _____________. NOTICE OF HEARING UPON PETITION TO REZONE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That Bluegill Inc. and Joe & Janet Mendel submitted a petition to rezone the following described real estate in the City of Brookings and Brookings County, South Dakota: A Portion of Bluegill Second Addition; A Portion of Bluegill Third Addition; and the SE ¼ NE ¼ excluding W 44’ thereof and exluding N 30’ and excluding the E 300’ thereof and excluding platted areas, all in Section 1-T109N-R50W from an A, Agricultural District to Residence R-1D Single Family District. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City & County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. Dated this 24 th day of November, 2017. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ORD 17-034,Version:2 Second Reading and Action on Ordinance 17-034, an Ordinance Amending the Landscaping Regulations. Summary: Discussion on amendments to the landscaping regulations. Background: Historically, there have been two main components of the landscaping/greenspace requirements in the City of Brookings. For multi-family uses, the greenspace requirements was based upon 300 square feet per unit regardless of the number of bedrooms within each unit as well as tree plantings based upon the amount of surfacing occurring on the lot. Commercial and industrial uses had similar tree planting requirements. The Planning Commission discussed landscaping/greenspace requirements during the April Planning Commission meeting and provided staff with the following guidance for drafting changes to the landscaping regulations: ·Landscaping should add value through aesthetic improvements to the property. ·Drainage improvements are acceptable within the yard requirements. ·Plant life and vegetation is viewed as a higher priority than square footage (quality vs. quantity). Utilizing the guidance from the Planning Commission, staff drafted landscaping regulations with similarities to the current surface based requirements. The most significant change in the greenspace requirements is the removal of the 300 square feet per unit for multi-family uses. While this reduction appears to be a significant change, the reality is often the additional greenspace was not usable greenspace in the aspect of it was added to the setbacks along the perimeter of the property and accounted for a few additional feet in width. In addition, drainage improvements qualify as meeting the greenspace requirement. If this change is acceptable, the greenspace requirement becomes the setbacks for the particular district in which it is located. To ensure the greenspace remains open and free of obstructions, staff is recommending parking, storage, merchandise and accessory structures are not allowed within the setback area. As an example, the current zoning regulations allow accessory structures to be five feet from the property line as well as the conversion of fifty percent of the required landscaped area may be used for parking spaces in excess of the minimum requirement. Other notable changes include the addition of foundation plantings, which would be required around the perimeter of all multi-family buildings and at a minimum along one foundation of a commercial or industrial use. The intent is to provide additional areas for vegetation to help with runoff from roofs, provide a visual break along facades, create separation between parking areas and buildings, and enhance entrances to buildings. The planting strip in commercial and industrial zones is proposed to be increased from eight to ten feet with a minimum five foot strip along the side lot line. In addition, City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:ORD 17-034,Version:2 language is proposed to require fifty percent of the rear yard of single and two-family uses to be maintained in a landscape area. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to recommend approval of the landscape ordinance with one amendment. Attachments: Landscape Ordinance as recommended by Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes 12/05/2017, 11/7/2017, 10/3/2017, 9/5/2017 Planning Commission Hearing Notice Multi Family Examples Zoning District Table City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Ordinance 17-034 An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Brookings and pertaining to Landscaping Requirements for the purposes of Administration of the Zoning Ordinance. Be It Ordained by the City Council of the City of Brookings, State of South Dakota: that Chapter 94, Zoning, shall be amended as follows: Section 1. Section 94-399 – Landscaping (a) Purpose and intent.The city recognizes the health, safety, aesthetic, ecological and economic value of landscaping and screening. The provisions of this section are intended to: (1) Add visual interest to open spaces and blank facades; (2) Soften dominant building mass; (3) Provide definition for public walkways and open space areas; (4) Ensure significant tree canopy shading to reduce glare and heat build-up; (5) Improve the visual quality and continuity within and between developments; (6) Provide screening and mitigation of potential conflicts between activity areas and more passive areas; (7) Protect and improve property values; (8) Improve air quality and provide a buffer from air and noise pollution; (9) Ensure safe and aesthetic treatment of ponding areas; (10) Enhance the overall aesthetic conditions within the city; (11) Limit sight line obstructions and drainage conflicts; and (12) Prevent conflicts with utilities. (b) Landscape plans. (1) Except for single family, two family, and property zoned agricultural, airport, or floodway district, a landscape plan must be submitted: a. With any application for new development; b.With any application for additions or modifications to existing development that physically impacts existing landscaping or screening; or c.When changes are made to an existing landscaping or screening plan on file with the city. (2) Landscape plans must be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. (3) Landscape plans must include the following information: a.Name of project, owner and developer. b.Street address of project. c.Scale (not less than one inch = 30 feet) and north arrow. d.All existing and proposed property lines. e.Above and below ground utilities and easements. f.Locations of existing and proposed buildings and all other structures. g.Location, identification and sizes of existing trees, shrubs and other vegetation that are to be retained as part of the landscaping. h.Location, identification and sizes of new trees, shrubs and other vegetation to be part of the landscaping. i.Location, width and height of all earth berms and retaining walls. j.Soil mix and depth for parking lot islands. k.Planting schedule. (c) Landscaping standards. (1) Soil surface stabilization.All disturbed areas outside of designated planting beds must be permanently stabilized with an established plant or xeriscaping soil cover. (2) Minimum number of trees.Except for single, two family, and agricultural uses, developments must at a minimum provide the following numbers of trees on site: a. One tree for the first 4,000 square feet of surfaced area. b. One tree for each additional 3,000 square feet of surfaced area. c. Existing healthy deciduous trees greater than four caliper inches or existing healthy conifer trees greater than six feet in height and are not identified on the city’s prohibited plant species list (see § 62-161) may be credited toward the minimum required trees on a site. (3) Minimum tree size.Each tree shall be balled and burlapped, container grown or planted by tree spade and shall meet the following minimum requirements at the time of planting: a. Deciduous trees must be at least one and one-half caliper inches at planting; b. Ornamental trees must be at least one and one-half caliper inches at planting; and c. Conifer trees must be at least six feet in height at planting. (4)Interior parking lot landscaping. The purpose of interior parking lot landscaping is to improve the appearance of parking lots, provide shade, and improve stormwater infiltration. All parking lots with 20,000 square feet or more of surfacing shall be landscaped in accordance with the following interior parking lot standards. a. Twenty percent of the trees required in section 94-399(c)(2) shall be planted in parking lot islands. Parking lot islands are raised or depressed non-traffic areas often containing landscape plantings in off-street parking lots, the placement of which is intended to improve safety and an orderly flow of traffic and to visually break up large expanses of surfacing. b. A minimum of one deciduous tree must be provided per parking lot island, with the following exceptions: 1. No trees are required in parking islands used for storm water management purposes; and 2. No trees are required in parking islands within structured parking facilities. c. Parking lot island soils shall be over-excavated and backfilled with 1,000 cubic feet of soils suitable to support tree growth. (5) Minimum landscape area.An area for landscaping, equivalent to the setback requirements, kept free of parking, storage, merchandise, or accessory structures, must be provided around the perimeter of a site with the following exceptions: a. Business and industrial uses shall provide a minimum ten foot wide landscape area along any right-of-way and five feet along a side lot line. b. Single family and two-family uses may have accessory structures, access drives, and parking located within the required landscape area provided not less than 50 percent of the rear yard is maintained in living ground cover. c. Walkways, trails, driveways, bus shelters and entrance drives leading to a parking or loading area may be located within the landscape area. Walkways abutting driveways shall be clearly delineated and reserved strictly for pedestrian use. d. Detention/retention ponds may be located within the minimum landscape area. e. Front yards of lots with residential uses shall be devoted entirely to landscaped area except for the necessary surfacing of driveways and walkways used to reach parking and loading areas. Walkways abutting driveways shall be clearly delineated and reserved strictly for pedestrian use. (6)Foundation plantings. A minimum planting strip of three (3’) feet shall be installed along all building foundations. Foundation plantings shall consist primarily of shrubs, perennials, and native grasses. Exceptions: a. Building foundations directly abutting a public sidewalk, public plaza, or other public hardscape feature shall be exempt from the foundation plantings. b. Business and industrial uses shall install plantings along foundations facing a public right-of-way. However, in business and industrial districts, corner lots may incorporate the total required square footage of foundation plantings into a landscape area adjacent to the building foundation along the street right-of-way with the highest classification or at the primary entrance to the building. c. Single family, two-family, and agricultural uses are exempt from foundation plantings. (7) Streetscape.In areas where a district or street specific streetscape plan has been adopted by the City Council, development must provide landscaping as set forth in the district or street specific streetscape plan. Streetscape plantings located within the property lines of the site may be credited toward the required number of trees and shrubs. Streetscape plantings in the public right-of-way shall not be credited toward the required number of trees and shrubs. Landscaping placed or removed in the public right-of-way must receive City approvals for right-of-way plantings and must conform with City right-of-way planting policies. (d) Maintenance. (1)Material maintenance.The property owner must maintain all landscaping and screening materials shown on the approved landscape plan in a manner consistent with the intent and purpose of the plan. Approved landscaping and screening materials that die, become diseased or are significantly damaged must be replaced at the next appropriate planting period with new materials in conformance with the approved landscape plan and applicable City Code standards. (2)Structure maintenance.Landscaping and screening structures such as fences and walls must be maintained in good condition, free of graffiti, peeling paint, decay or warping, must be repaired when needed and replaced periodically to maintain a structurally sound condition. (3)Removal.Unless a modified landscape plan is approved, landscaping and screening materials and structures approved on a landscape plan must not be removed except when replaced in accordance with this section. (e)Redevelopment compliance. (1)Redevelopment or large addition.When either full redevelopment of a site is proposed or an addition that would increase total floor area on a site by 25 percent or more, a landscape plan for the entire site, demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section, must be submitted for approval. (2)Small addition.When an addition is proposed that would increase total floor area on a site by less than 25 percent, but would physically impact existing landscaping, a modified landscape plan for the portion of the site affected by the addition, demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section, must be submitted for approval. (3) Constrained sites. The City recognizes that highly constrained redevelopment sites may have difficulty meeting the landscaping requirements. Given that the City seeks to encourage rather than impede redevelopment, highly constrained redevelopment sites may seek relief from the landscape standards through the planned development process. In considering planned development flexibility to landscape standards, the City shall: a. Balance the public interest in promoting redevelopment with the public interest in providing landscaping; and b. Consider whether reduced landscaping levels are balanced by alternative methods of providing visual interest to the site including but not limited to sculpture, public art or higher quality landscaping materials. Section 2. Section 94-399, as set forth above, also amends the landscaping requirements set forth in the density, area, yard and height regulations tables set forth in Sections 94- 126(f), 94-127(f), 94-128(f) and 94-130(f). The following provision, denoted by a single asterisk (*), shall replace the current provision and shall be included in each density, area, yard and height regulation table for Sections 94-126(f), 94-127(f), 94-128(f) and 94-130(f): * Parking lots shall be screened from single-family and two-family residential uses according to Section 94-401. Section 3. Any or all ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. First Reading:December 12, 2017 Second Reading and Adoption: Published: CITY OF BROOKINGS Keith W. Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: Shari Thornes, City Clerk Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota December 5, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Justin Bucher – Banner Associates, and others. Item #7b - The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-399 pertaining to Landscaping. (Rasmussen/Pierce ) Motion to remove from the table. All in favor. (Pierce/Gregg) Motion to approve the amendments. (Pierce/Tornquist) Amendment to the motion that Section 1., (c), 6b. (Exceptions to foundation plantings.) shall read “ Business and industrial uses shall install plantings along foundations facing a public right of way. However, corner lots in business and industrial districts may incorporate the total required square footage foundation plantings into a landscape area adjacent to the building foundation along the street right-of-way with the highest classification or at the primary entrance to the building. All present voted aye. AMENDMENT CARRIED. Motion as amended was voted on. Drew and Tornquist voted no. All others voted yes. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #7b – Fargen asked how the city will handle the properties that are already developed and they want to come forward and make any kind of improvements but they can’t meet the new requirements. Struck explained that they will be considered non-conforming status and they will be grandfathered in. These properties are allowed to do a certain amount of improvements before they are required to meet new requirements. Heuton asked, in this type of situation, would a property owner be able to apply for a variance if they are not able to meet the requirements. Struck explained that a variance could be applied for through the Board of Adjustment. Pierce questioned item b2. Under Section 1, “Landscape plans must be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department.” If a citizen comes in and the city doesn’t approve their plan, does the citizen have an appeal option in the ordinance? Struck explained that if there is an interpretation question on any ordinance, a citizen has the right to appeal this to the Board of Adjustment. Particularly Pierce questioned the “Constrained sites” portion under Section 1, (e) 3. Struck stated that a developer may proceed through the Planned Development process if they feel they have a constrained site. Constrained sites might be considered if the developer has some unusual terrain to deal with or an irregular lot might cause some issues. Aiken asked if something like large tree preservation would qualify as a Constrained Sight qualification? Struck explained that this could apply. Johnson asked if there would be restrictions against gardens and the size of gardens, in another ordinance? Struck explained that the only restriction the City would have would be height restrictions. Tornquist is concerned about Section 1., (c) Landscaping Standards, 6b. Exceptions to foundations plantings. She wondered why we wouldn’t want to require foundation plantings on all 4 sides? Struck explained that if there were drive-thru facilities needed, you wouldn’t be able to have foundation plantings where the drive-thru window is located. Bungard also added that the drive lane to the drive-thru window would make it impossible to have foundation plantings. Tornquist wondered if there could be an exception for those that had drive-thru windows, rather than to allow everyone the option for this exception. Aiken feels that the amendments have been improved greatly. There are some adjustments made that are pertinent to tree plantings. Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota November 7, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, November 7, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Also present were Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, David Jones, Joshua Westwick, and others. Item #5b - The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-399 pertaining to Landscaping. (Aiken/Gregg) Motion to remove from the table. All in favor. (Tornquist/Aiken) Motion to table. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #5b – Struck explained that City Staff found some recent projects and they completed a comparison for the number of trees required based on the old ordinance and the proposed new ordinance, where the number of trees increased based on the footprint size of the building. So a smaller office building would only increase by a few trees, but a larger warehouse type building would have significantly more trees. Staff feels that you would need to go with a ratio type scenario in order for the tree plantings to be healthy with proper spacing. Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota October 3, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, October 3, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Greg Fargen, Alan Gregg, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Absent was Alan Johnson. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Ryan McKnight, Jeremy Scott, Blake Hoffman, Nacasius Ujah, Matt Anderson, Jordan McCaskill, Joseph Mohr, Tanner Nelson, Jacob Rohlik, Ryan Schiller, Joshua Westwick, Jolynn Tomhave, and others. Item #6a - The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-398 pertaining to Landscaping. (Gregg/Aiken) Motion to remove from the table. All in favor. (Aiken/Fargen) Motion to approve the amendments. (Rasmussen/Tornquist) Motion to table. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Item #6a –The presented amendment is based off public comment and comments from the Planning Commission. Staff did complete research based on the commission requests. The most significant change in the greenspace requirements is the removal of the 300 square feet per unit requirement. For each district, the required setbacks will be the greenspace. This change will make for more usable greenspace as it will remain open and free from obstructions. It will create more of a streetscape and have landscaping and plantings around the perimeter of a sight. Parking, storage, merchandise, and other structures will not be allowed to be in this setback area. While this reduction appears to be a significant change, the reality is that the greenspace was not usable. Other notable changes include the addition of foundation plantings, required around multi- family buildings. And at a minimum along one side of the foundation on a commercial or industrial use building. This would eliminate asphalt or concrete parking going right up to the outside of buildings. Also, the planting strip in commercial and industrial districts is proposed to go from 8’ to 10’ with a minimum 5’ required strip along the side lot line. The 5’ strip along the side lot line is an addition in this amendment. Another change is the requirement of 50% of the rear yard in single and two-family uses to be maintained in landscape area. Heuton asked if this change would affect an accessory building being added to a single family home, would they have to be 25 foot off of the lot line? Bungard explained that this wouldn’t apply to single and two family. Just multi-family. But the 50% requirement could affect someone in the downtown area if they were wanting to put up a detached garage. Bungard showed how the greenspace area would affect a current 5-unit and 22 unit apartment complex. Tornquist asked if additional parking would then be required? Bungard stated that it would be possible depending on the requirements for the size of the complex. In the 22 unit apartment complex example, there would be additional perimeter greenspace required from the current requirements. Tornquist asked if foundation plantings on one side would still be required? Bungard stated that all sides would be required to have foundation plantings because it is a residential use. Aiken commented that some greenspace will be lost in certain areas, but then it will be made up in other areas such as tree plantings with islands in a parking lot. Bungard concurred with this statement. Pierce wondered why is there a height requirement being applied to the conifers? If it is a newly planted conifer tree, 6 foot is rather tall, and she wonders why a 4 foot tree wouldn’t be acceptable. Pierce feels that typically residential single-family developments are the only ones that are going to plant conifers and there could be more of an expense if the 6 foot tree is required. Bungard stated that conifers could also be planted in multi-family and apartment developments and business and industrial properties. Pierce then wondered if this requirement was going to apply to residential single-family developments then? Bungard was unsure of the reasoning behind the 6 foot height requirement. Aiken explained that the 6 foot height is a standard requirement. Aiken questioned the requirement of having one tree planting for the first 4,000 square feet of surfaced area. Is this counting the building square footage or the footprint of the building as square footage? Bungard recalled that a recent conversation with City Staff indicated that when you start looking at a larger sight, such as a large retail business, there will be a significant amount of landscaping area, and that wouldn’t include the building footprint. Fargen noted that the ordinance states that the landscaping plan must be reviewed and approved by the Community Development staff. Fargen asked who is this? Bungard explained that it would be herself, or Mike Struck, Community Development Director. Fargen is also concerned that the staff report indicates that the landscaping regulations should help control density. He feels that there are several ways of controlling density and doesn’t feel that density control should be included in the landscaping regulations. He does like the idea of quality over quantity in this amended ordinance. Drew is concerned about the requirement of landscaping around all 4 sides of a multi-family building. He feels that there are going to be sides of a building that will not receive sufficient sunlight for proper growth and health of landscaping. And this will cause extra maintenance work. Additionally, if it is a garage, you are not going to be able to landscape around all 4 sides. He feels the verbiage needs to be adjusted to indicate a situation like a garage where you cannot landscape on all 4 sides. He feels that the blanket verbiage of landscaping around all 4 sides needs to be rewritten. Pierce is concerned about page 3, Item #5b, regarding Minimum Landscape Area. It says that single family and two family uses may have accessory structures, access drives, and parking located within the required landscape area provided not less than 50 percent of the rear yard is maintained in living ground cover. In previous conversations it was discussed that this requirement is put in to place so people cannot use their whole backyard for parking. However she is concerned with the properties in the Historic District and around SDSU where there is a lot of rental properties and there is parking problems. A lot of the landlords have made additional parking in their backyards to keep parking off the streets. She feels that this ordinance will discourage property owners from trying to resolve the parking issue. Additionally there are some smaller homes that do not have driveways in front of the house and their only driveway or parking is at the rear of the property in the alley. So the 50% requirement needs to be looked at and maybe lowered. She wonders if this requirement could be tied to alley accesses. And if you have alley access for parking, then this number should be different. Tornquist and Pierce feel that the ordinance is difficult to follow as there are different rules for different districts. Planning Commission Brookings, South Dakota September 5th, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Absent was Greg Fargen. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Mike McClemans, John Mills, Donald Denure, David Jones, Rick Ribstein, Larry Fjeldos, Kelan Bludorn, Mary and Orren Erickson, Kathy Larson, John Kratochvil, Tom Becker, Shawn Weber, Josh Westwick, Stacy Davis, Jolane Tomhave, and others. Item #8b – The City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-399 pertaining to Landscaping. (Tornquist/Aiken) Motion to table. All present voted aye. MOTION CARRIED. OFFICIAL SUMMARY Chairperson Al Heuton called the regular meeting of the City Planning Commission to order on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, at 5:30 PM in the Chambers Room #310 on the third floor of the City & County Government Center. Members present were Tanner Aiken, James Drew, Alan Gregg, Alan Johnson, Lee Ann Pierce, Kristi Tornquist, Eric Rasmussen and Heuton. Absent was Greg Fargen. Also present were City Planner Staci Bungard, Community Development Director Mike Struck, City Engineer Jackie Lanning, Mike McClemans, John Mills, Donald Denure, David Jones, Rick Ribstein, Larry Fjeldos, Kelan Bludorn, Mary and Orren Erickson, Kathy Larson, John Kratochvil, Tom Becker, Shawn Weber, Josh Westwick, Stacy Davis, Jolane Tomhave, and others. Item #8b – Pierce is concerned about “Section b, Landscape plans” – 1. Except for single family and two family uses. She feels that the ag district should also be exempt. Additionally, “Section c, Landscaping standards” – 3. Minimum tree size. She feels that item c1. “Conifer trees may only be planted on the perimeter of the site” should be removed since the only place we have problems with conifer tree plantings is in parking lots. And maybe in Section c3-4 Interior parking lot landscaping it could state that conifer trees cannot be planted in parking lots. If you require assistance, alternative formats and/or accessible locations consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City ADA Coordinator at 692-6281 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Published ______ time(s) at an approximate cost of $ _____________. NOTICE OF HEARING UPON A CHANGE IN ZONE REGULATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the City of Brookings has submitted ordinance amendments to Section 94-399, pertaining to Landscaping. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That said request will be acted on by the City Planning Commission at 5:30 PM on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, in the Chambers Room on the third floor of the Brookings City and County Government Center at 520 Third Street, Brookings, South Dakota. Any action taken by the City Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council. Any person interested may appear and be heard in this matter. Dated this 25th day of August, 2017. ____________________________ Staci Bungard City Planner District Applicability Requirements Agriculture (A), Floodway (FW), Airport (AP) Exempt None R-1, R-1A, R-1B, R-1C, R- 1D Single & two-family uses are exempt except for 50% landscaped area in rear yard, other uses are subject to ordinance Setback of the district is landscaped area; foundation plantings; tree plantings; parking lot landscaping R-2, R-3, R-3A, RMH Single & two-family uses are exempt except for 50% landscaped area in rear yard, other uses are subject to ordinance Setback of the district is landscaped area; foundation plantings; tree plantings; parking lot landscaping RB-4,B-2, B-2A, B-3, B-4, B-5 Applies to all uses 10’planting strip along right-of- way, 5’ along side lot lines; foundation plantings; tree plantings; parking lot landscaping I-1, 1-2 Applies to all uses 10’ planting strip along right-of- way, 5’ along side lot lines; foundation plantings; tree plantings; parking lot landscaping City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:RES 18-001,Version:1 Public Hearing and Action on Resolution 18-001, a Resolution authorizing a Real Estate Exchange Agreement between the City of Brookings and John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC. Summary: The Main Avenue South and 26th Street South project included acquiring a parcel of land in the Prairie Hills Addition for the construction of a sanitary sewer lift station. The lift station parcel was recently replatted and this resolution will authorize the Real Estate Exchange Agreement to acquire the property. Background: The Main Avenue South and 26th Street South project included construction of a sanitary sewer lift station in Prairie Hills Addition. The lift station parcel was recently replatted and the City and the developer have agreed upon a Real Estate Exchange Agreement to finalize the project. In addition to the lift station parcel, the City will receive small parcels of land in Indian Hills Addition where the City’s Bike Trail encroached onto private property. The real estate exchange is summarized as follows: The City will receive the following property: Lot 1B of Block 17 of Prairie Hills Addition (lift station lot) Lots 53A, 53B and 53C of Sioux Village of Indian Hills Addition (small parcels along Indian Hills Bike Trail) The developer, John H. Mills, will receive the following property: Lots 50, 51, and 51A of Sioux Village in Indian Hills Addition (former BMU electric substation lot adjacent to Trail Ridge Road) The City shall pay the sum of $7,456.46 at the time of closing for the land exchange. The City received three market opinions of value from local real estate agents and published the public hearing as required by statute. The plat maps are attached showing which parcels are being exchanged. Fiscal Impact: The City shall pay the sum of $7,456.46 at the time of closing. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Resolution Agreement Maps City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:RES 18-001,Version:1 Notice City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Resolution 18-001 Resolution authorizing Real Estate Exchange Agreement between the City of Brookings and John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota as follows: Whereas, for the purpose of acquisition of real property for the location of a sanitary sewer lift station and to provide additional land for the recreational trail of the City of Brookings (“City”), the City desires to acquire from John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC (“Prairie Hills”), the following described property: Tract 1. Lots Fifty-three “A” (53A), Fifty-three “B” (53B) and Fifty-three “C” (53C) of Sioux Village of Indian Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota. Tract 2. Lot One “B” (1B) of Block 17 of Prairie Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota, and Whereas, the City of Brookings no longer requires the following described property because an electric substation previously located upon this property has been relocated and therefore proposes to exchange the following described property in exchange for the above-described property: Tract 3. Lots Fifty (50), Fifty-one (51) and Fifty-one “A” (51A) of Sioux Village in Indian Hills Addition, City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota; and Whereas, the City of Brookings has determined the exchange of the above- described properties for the purposes set forth above is in the best interests of the City of Brookings; Now Therefore, It Is Hereby Resolved by the City Council of the City of Brookings, South Dakota, as follows: A. That the City of Brookings acquire title to Tracts One (1) and Two (2) of the above-described real property from John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC for the purposes of obtaining a location for a sewer lift station and for recreational trail purposes; and B. That the City of Brookings pay the sum of $7,456.46 and to convey title to Tract Three (3) to an entity designated by John H. Mills in exchange for Tracts One (1) and Two (2); and C. That the Mayor, City Clerk, City Manager and City Attorney are authorized to execute a Real Estate Exchange Agreement and other required documents in accordance with this Resolution. Passed and approved on the 9th day of January, 2018. CITY OF BROOKINGS Keith Corbett, Mayor ATTEST: Shari Thornes, City Clerk REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT __________________ THIS REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT is made and executed by and between the City of Brookings, South Dakota, a South Dakota Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC, (hereinafter referred to as the “John H. Mills/Prairie Hills”): WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, each of the parties desires to acquire certain real property from the other party, pursuant to the terms of this Real Estate Exchange Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: 1. Exchange of Real Property. John H. Mills and Prairie Hills hereby agree to convey to City and City hereby agrees to acquire from John H. Mills/Prairie Hills the following described real property: Tract 1. Lots Fifty-three “A” (53A), Fifty-three “B” (53B) and Fifty-three “C” (53C) of Sioux Village of Indian Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota. Tract 2. Lot One “B” (1B) of Block 17 of Prairie Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota, and In exchange for the above-described property, the City hereby agrees to convey to the entity designated by John H. Mills/Prairie Hills and John H. Mills/Prairie Hills hereby agree to acquire from City the following described real property: Tract 3. Lots Fifty (50), Fifty-one (51) and Fifty-one “A” (51A) of Sioux Village in Indian Hills Addition, City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota. 2.Additional Cash Consideration.The City shall pay to Prairie Hills LLC or another entity designated by John H. Mills at Closing the additional sum of Seven Thousand Four Hundred Fifty Six and 46/100 ($7,456.46) Dollars. 3.Real Estate Closing Documents and Miscellaneous. City shall provide a Warranty Deed to the entity designated by John H. Mills at Closing to include the property described as Tract 3 above. City shall convey said property free of liens and mortgages, but said property may be subject to easements, rights of way and restrictions of record. John H. Mills and Prairie Hills shall, in turn, provide a Warranty Deed to City at Closing to include the property described as Tracts 1 and 2 above. John H. Mills and Prairie Hills shall convey said property free of liens and mortgages, but said 2 property may be subject to easements, rights of way and restrictions of record. In addition, John H. Mills and Prairie Hills and City, as the case may be, shall also perform the following: A.Title Insurance Policy. Title Insurance is not required for this transaction. B.Deed Preparation. The City Attorney will prepare the respective Warranty Deeds and Certificates of Real Estate Value at no cost to John H. Mills or Prairie Hills. C.Transfer Fee and Real Estate Taxes. (a) Transfer Fee. This transaction is exempt from transfer fees. (b) Real Estate Taxes. The only real estate taxes which will be payable are the 2017 Real Estate Taxes for Tracts 1 and 2. For simplicity, the parties agree that John H. Mills or Prairie Hills will pay these 2017 taxes when due. There should be no taxes due after recording the Deed to Tracts 1 and 2 and the City will agree to abate any 2018 taxes imposed on Tracts 1 and 2. D.Closing Date. The Closing Date shall occur when a mutually acceptable Closing Date is selected. E.Possession/Property Conveyed “As Is”. The parties shall each acquire possession of the above-described property immediately following Closing. The parties have inspected the above-described property and accept the condition of the property “as is”. 4.Contingency. The obligation of the City to purchase the above-described property pursuant to this Agreement is contingent upon the following contingency: (a) The parties also acknowledge the following contingency is also a condition precedent to the performance of this Agreement by the City. Briefly stated, the contingency concerns the right of the public to petition for referendum concerning this transaction. This is viewed by the City as unlikely, and discussed at greater length in subsection (i) below. (i) Referendum/Election. The City’s obligation to purchase the property described herein will be terminated if the City Council’s decision to purchase the above-described property is referred by the voters and the voters do not approve the purchase. “Referred” means a Petition to Refer, signed by the 3 requisite residents, is filed and the voters of the City, at an election, vote to nullify the decision of the City to purchase or pay for the property described herein. In the event of a successful referral, this Agreement will be null and void. This contingency will be waived at the later of the expiration date of any referendum period if there is no referendum, or the date following the election canvassing if there is a referendum election, and the purchase is approved at a referendum election. However, a referendum decision by voters of the City which does not approve the purchase will permit the City to terminate this Agreement at no cost or liability to the City. A referendum is not likely but all government real estate transactions are subject to the possibility of referendum. The City will be able to waive this contingency 20 days after publication of the Resolution approving this Purchase Agreement. If the foregoing contingencies are not satisfied or resolved or waived by the City, then this Agreement may be terminated at the option of the City and this Agreement shall be null and void. 5.Good Faith/Mutual Cooperation. (a) The City will in good faith seek to satisfy all contingencies to this Real Estate Purchase Agreement and will act in a timely manner to permit its prompt Closing. At any time and from time to time before and after the Closing, the City will, at the request of Sellers, and without further consideration, promptly execute, acknowledge and deliver such further instruments and take such further action as Sellers may reasonably request in order to consummate and confirm the transaction contemplated by this Agreement and to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement; however, no such instruments or actions will impose upon the City any burden or obligation which is in excess of any burden or obligation specifically imposed upon the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. (b) At any time and from time to time before and after the Closing, Sellers will, at the request of the City, and without further consideration, promptly execute, acknowledge and deliver such further instruments and take such further action as the City may reasonably request in order to consummate and confirm the transaction contemplated by this Agreement and to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement; however, no such instruments or 4 actions will impose upon Sellers any burden or obligation which is in excess of any burden or obligation specifically imposed upon Sellers pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 6.Right of First Refusal. In the event the City of Brookings, South Dakota offers Tract 1 or 2 for sale and receives a bona fide offer from any person, company or other entity for the purchase of part or all of Tracts 1 and 2, and should the City of Brookings, South Dakota or its successors or assigns be willing to accept such offer, the City of Brookings, South Dakota or its successors or assigns shall provide John H. Mills or Prairie Hills with a copy of the offer and a copy of any proposed contract covering the sale of the above described real property and shall notify John H. Mills or Prairie Hills that it has accepted the proposed offer subject to this Right of First Refusal. For a period of sixty (60) days following receipt of the copy of said offer as contained in the proposed contract, John H. Mills or Prairie Hills shall have the right and option to enter into a real estate purchase contract with the City of Brookings, South Dakota on the same terms and conditions specified in the bona fide offer or proposed contract. In the event John H. Mills or Prairie Hills shall not so elect within the sixty (60) day period, the City of Brookings, South Dakota may then proceed to sell the part or all of the above- described real property to the potential buyer, provided the sale is completed upon the same terms and conditions and for the same purchase price set forth in the bona fide offer or contract delivered to John H. Mills or Prairie Hills. This Right of First Refusal shall run with the land described as Tracts 1 and 2. 7.Notice. This Real Estate Exchange Agreement was prepared by Steven J. Britzman, City Attorney for the City of Brookings, 521 Sixth Street, Suite 104, Brookings, South Dakota 57006. 8.Entire Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the complete Agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written Agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement and no waiver of its terms will be effective unless such are made and executed in writing and duly acknowledged as received by the parties. 9.Binding Effect. This Agreement binds the parties hereto and their heirs, successors and assigns, if any. Dated this 9th day of January, 2018.CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA (SEAL)By: ____________________________ ATTEST: Keith Corbett, Mayor ________________________________ Shari Thornes, City Clerk 5 Dated this ____ day of January, 2018.JOHN H. MILLS (SEAL) John H. Mills Dated this ____ day of January, 2018. PRAIRIE HILLS (SEAL) By: By: John H. Mills, President NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF INTENT TO EXCHANGE REAL PROPERTY WITH PRIVATE PERSON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on January 9, 2018 at 6:00 o'clock P.M., the Brookings City Council will hold a Public Hearing at the Council Chambers on an Agreement of the City of Brookings which provides for an exchange of real property with John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC of the following described property: Exchange of Real Property. John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC proposes to convey to City and City to acquire from John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC, the following described real property: Tract 1. Lots Fifty-three “A” (53A), Fifty-three “B” (53B) and Fifty-three “C” (53C) of Sioux Village of Indian Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota. Tract 2. Lot One “B” (1B) of Block 17 of Prairie Hills Addition to the City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota, and In exchange for the above-described property, the City proposes to convey to the entity designated by John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC the following described real property: Tract 3. Lots Fifty (50), Fifty-one (51) and Fifty-one “A” (51A) of Sioux Village in Indian Hills Addition, City of Brookings, County of Brookings, State of South Dakota. At the time and place set for this Public Hearing, all who appear will be given an opportunity to express their views for or against the proposal to enter into a Real Estate Exchange Agreement concerning the above-described property with John H. Mills and Prairie Hills LLC. Dated this 26 th day of December, 2017. CITY OF BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA Shari L. Thornes, City Clerk City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0010,Version:1 Discussion and possible action on the scope of work and proposed project for remodeling of the County Resource Center for the Swiftel Center. Summary: With previous City Council action, the City purchased the County Resource Center (CRC) from Brookings County with the intent of providing for expanded conference, meeting, and office space for operations of the Swiftel Center. That transaction has been completed and we are making five-year payments to the County for acquisition of this building space. As intended, the CRC space needs upgrades and certain remodeling improvements to make it more suitable for Swiftel Center uses. This project accomplishes that. Background: The attachment provides an itemization of the scope of the project and associated with the project. The first page describes building areas referenced in the project followed by the total estimated cost by the nature of the work. Subsequent pages itemize the work by building area with associated costs. The primary scope of work in all areas involves repainting the rooms, new floor coverings, and HVAC upgrades. Technology upgrades are necessary to four meeting rooms (County Rooms C & D, small conference room, and board room) so they can be utilized to clients for rent similar to the Daktronics Conference Center rooms. The second floor staff offices will move to the CRC office area. Two small areas in the Swiftel Center are proposed for minor work; the current staff administration area on the second floor will be retrofitted for program/operations staff equipment storage. The ticket office will be modified for increased security and ticket sales operations. The estimated cash balance in Fund 284 (third penny) at year-end is $890,982. We have a policy that requires operating expenses be paid with operating revenues so all next year’s budgeted expenditures in this fund are provided for with incoming revenue. This capital project is an authorized expenditure from this fund’s cash balance. Fiscal Impact: Use of cash balance in Fund 284 in the estimated amount of $574,172.10. Recommendation: The staff recommendation is to approve the scope of work for the project, authorize the budget from Fund 284, and direct staff to proceed with the development of plans and specifications for the project. Attachments: Renovations Estimate City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ UP 17195 SWIFTEL FINISHES RENOVATIONS DECEMBER 19, 2017 | JLG 17195 | © 2017 JLG ARCHITECTS AREA PLAN 0 8 16 32XXXXXX SECOND FLOOR PLAN OFFICE AREA COUNTY ROOM C COUNTY ROOM D ADMINISTRATION AREA TICKET OFFICE AREA KEY COUNTY ROOM C COUNTY ROOM D OFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICEOFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM BOARD ROOM OFFICE OPEN OFFICE VESTIBULE VESTIBULE TICKET OFFICE ADMINISTRATION PRINTED 12/21/2017COST PER SF COSTNOTESDIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQ.$3.15$32,376.18DIVISION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS$3.23$33,168.00DIVISION 6 - WOODS, PLASTICS & COMPOSITES$4.25$43,720.00DIVISION 8 - OPENINGS$1.25$12,800.00DIVISION 9 - FINISHES$11.08$113,863.50DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES$0.07$750.00SUBTOTAL GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$23.03$236,677.68DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING$0.20$2,100.00DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATION & AC$3.25$33,400.00DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL$2.92$30,000.00SUBTOTAL MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL$6.37$65,500.00Contractor OH&P$2.94 $30,217.77Does not include items by Owner, listed below.CONTINGENCY$4.41$45,326.65Does not includeitems by Owner, listed below.TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$36.76$377,722.10Owner Provided Items (not included in Construction Cost):DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT$10,000.00DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS$24,450.00DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL$137,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$16.69$171,450.00A/E Design Compensation$25,000.00**Note: Preliminary estimate based on work executed to date - work is performed hourly per the Prime Agreement.TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST$55.88$574,172.10SWIFTEL RENOVATIONS COST SUMMARY 10%15%Page 1 ADMINISTRATION AREAQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements12.0% $14,020.00 1 $1,682.40Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$1,682.40DIVISION 2-EXISTING CONDITIONSSelective Demolition & Salvage 650 SF $3.00 1 $1,950.00Remove existing finishes and prep for installation of new finishes.TOTAL DIVISION 2$1,950.00DIVISION 9-FINISHESCarpet Tile73 SY $40.00 1 $2,920.00Install new carpet tile in the north office and hallwayReplace Damaged Ceiling Tiles 65 SF $3.00 1 $195.00Replace 10% of the ACT ceiling tiles in the north office and hallwayVinyl Base160 LF $5.00 1 $800.00Install new rubber wall base at the north office and hallwayWall Paint1,255 SF $1.00 1 $1,255.00Repaint the walls in the north office and hallwayPaint Door Frames6 EA $150.00 1 $900.00Paint the door framesTOTAL DIVISION 9$6,070.00DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC Mechanical Construction1 LS $6,000.00 1 $6,000.00Tie the existing HVAC system into the new BAS systemTOTAL DIVISION 23$6,000.00SUB-TOTAL$15,702.40Contractor OH&P10%$1,570.24CONTINGENCY15%$2,355.36TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$19,628.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$19,628.00 COUNTY ROOM CQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements12.0% $55,095.00 1 $6,611.40Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$6,611.40DIVISION 2-EXISTING CONDITIONSSelective Demolition & Salvage 3,225 SF $3.00 1 $9,675.00Remove existing finishes and prep for installation of new finishes, and remove (5) doors.TOTAL DIVISION 2$9,675.00DIVISION 6-WOODS PLASTICS AND COMPOSITESWood Trim Chair Rail126 LF $10.00 1 $1,260.00Add wood chair rail at perimeter of the room to match the Daktronics Event Hall.TOTAL DIVISION 6$1,260.00DIVISION 8-OPENINGSWood Doors & Hardware6 EA $1,100.00 1 $6,600.00Replace (1) metal door with a wood door to match existing wood doors, and replace (4) damaged wood doors.TOTAL DIVISION 8$6,600.00DIVISION 9-FINISHESCarpet Tile332 SY $40.00 1 $13,280.00Install carpet tile.Ceiling Paint1,626 SF $1.50 1 $2,439.00Repaint the gyp ceiling coffersKitchen LVT Flooring234 SF $10.00 1 $2,340.00Install luxury vinyl tile (LVT) at the kitchenPartition Wall Fabric Upgrade 600 SF $12.00 1 $7,200.00Replace the fabric on the operable partition wallReplace Ceiling Tiles1,600 SF $3.00 1 $4,800.00Replace the ACT ceiling tilesVinyl Base 203 LF $5.00 1 $1,015.00Install new rubber wall base around the perimeter of the room, and in the kitchenWall Paint2,436 SF $1.00 1 $2,436.00Repaint the wallsPaint Door Frames7 EA $150.00 1 $1,050.00Repaint the door framesTOTAL DIVISION 9$34,560.00DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC Mechanical Construction1 LS $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00Tie the HVAC and temperature controls into the new BAS systemTOTAL DIVISION 23$3,000.00SUB-TOTAL$61,706.40Contractor OH&P10%$6,170.64Does not include items by Owner, listed below.CONTINGENCY15%$9,255.96Does not include items by Owner, listed below.TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$77,133.00Owner Provided ItemsDIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENTProjection Screen1 EA $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00Add new projection screen (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)DIVISION 26- ELECTRICALProjector1 EA $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00Install new projector (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)Audio System1 LS $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00Install new Audio system (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$28,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$105,133.00 COUNTY ROOM DQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements12.0% $36,790.50 1 $4,414.86Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$4,414.86DIVISION 2-EXISTING CONDITIONSSelective Demolition & Salvage 2,035 SF $3.00 1 $6,105.00Remove existing finishes and prep for installation of new finishes, and remove (1) door.TOTAL DIVISION 2$6,105.00DIVISION 6-WOODS PLASTICS AND COMPOSITESWood Trim Chair Rail126 LF $10.00 1 $1,260.00Add wood chair rail at perimeter of the room to match the Daktronics Event Hall.TOTAL DIVISION 6$1,260.00DIVISION 8-OPENINGSWood Doors & Hardware2 EA $1,100.00 1 $2,200.00Replace (1) metal door with a wood door to match existing wood doorsTOTAL DIVISION 8$2,200.00DIVISION 9-FINISHESCarpet Tile (County Room D) 212 SY $40.00 1 $8,480.00Install carpet tile.Ceiling Paint (County Room D) 959 SF $1.50 1 $1,438.50Repaint the gyp ceiling coffersKitchen LVT Flooring (County Room D) 126 SF $10.00 1 $1,260.00Install luxury vinyl tile (LVT) at the kitchenPartition Wall Fabric Upgrade (County Room D) 600 SF $12.00 1 $7,200.00Replace the fabric on the operable partition wallReplace Ceiling Tiles (County Room D) 950 SF $3.00 1 $2,850.00Replace the ACT ceiling tilesVinyl Base (County Room D) 141 SF $5.00 1 $705.00Install new rubber wall base around the perimeter of the room, and in the kitchenWall Paint (County Room D) 1,692 SF $1.00 1 $1,692.00Repaint the wallsPaint Door Frames (County Room D) 4 EA $150.00 1 $600.00Repaint the door framesTOTAL DIVISION 9$24,225.50DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC Mechanical Construction1 LS $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00Tie the HVAC and temperature controls into the new BAS systemTOTAL DIVISION 23$3,000.00SUB-TOTAL$41,205.36Contractor OH&P10%$4,120.54Does not include items by Owner, listed below.CONTINGENCY15%$6,180.80Does not include items by Owner, listed below.TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$51,506.70Owner Provided ItemsDIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENTProjection Screen1 EA $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00Add new projection screen (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)DIVISION 26- ELECTRICALProjector1 EA $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00Install new projector (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)Audio System1 LS $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00Install new Audio system (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$28,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$79,506.70 OFFICE AREAQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements 12.0% $118,711.00 1 $14,245.32Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$14,245.32DIVISION 2-EXISTING CONDITIONSSelective Demolition & Salvage 4,666 SF $3.00 1 $13,998.00Remove existing finishes, prep for installation of new finishes, remove existing sink in public restroom, remove (1) doorTOTAL DIVISION 2$13,998.00DIVISION 6-WOODS PLASTICS AND COMPOSITESBathroom Vanity and Sink 3 LF $400.00 1 $1,200.00Install new sink (to match existing public restrooms)Replace Office Countertops 110 LF $150.00 1 $16,500.00Replace all countertops in each officeNew Office Casework110 LF $200.00 1 $22,000.00Install new casework in each officeTOTAL DIVISION 6$39,700.00DIVISION 8-OPENINGSStorefront Opening SF01 40 SF $45.00 1 $1,800.00Install new storefront system and door at entry to office suiteWood Doors & Hardware2 EA $1,100.00 1 $2,200.00Install (2) new doors and related hardwareTOTAL DIVISION 8$4,000.00DIVISION 9-FINISHESA4 Wall Construction80 SF $6.50 1 $520.00Construct new wall in IT Office (A106 per floor plan)Bathroom Ceramic Tile184 SF $15.00 1 $2,760.00Install ceramic tile in the restroom (to match existing public restrooms)Carpet Tile518 SY $40.00 1 $20,720.00Install new carpet tilePaint Door Frames14 EA $150.00 1 $2,100.00Repaint all door framesReplace Damaged Ceiling Tiles 936 SF $3.00 1 $2,808.00Replace 20% of the ACT ceiling tilesVestibule Walkoff Carpet 24 SY $45.00 1 $1,080.00Install walk-off carpet in the north and south entry vestibulesVinyl Base 985 SF $5.00 1 $4,925.00Install new rubber wall baseWall Paint9,850 SF $1.00 1 $9,850.00Repaint the wallsTOTAL DIVISION 9$44,763.00DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIESBaby Changing Station1 EA $750.00 1 $750.00Install baby changing station in the restroomTOTAL DIVISION 10$750.00DIVISION 22 - PLUMBINGRestroom Plumbing Update 1 EA $2,100.00 1$2,100.00Install new automatic flush valve on the toilet in the restroom (to match existing public restrooms)Remove and replace existing countertop lavatory.TOTAL DIVISION 21$2,100.00DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC Mechanical Construction1 LS $13,400.00 1 $13,400.00Tie the HVAC and temperature controls into the new BAS systemTOTAL DIVISION 23$13,400.00SUB-TOTAL$132,956.32Contractor OH&P10%$13,295.63Does not include items by Owner, listed below.CONTINGENCY15%$19,943.45Does not include items by Owner, listed below.TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$166,195.40Owner Provided ItemsDIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENTProjection Screen2 EA $2,000.00 1 $4,000.00Install (1) projection screen in the Conference Room and (1) in the Board Room (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGSOffice Work Stations (Partition Walls) 4 EA $4,500.00 1$18,000.00Pricing based on 8'x8' work stations; 7' tall (66" solid wall panels + 18" glazed panels on top); by Owner.DIVISION 26- ELECTRICALProjector2 EA $10,000.00 1 $20,000.00Install (1) projector in the Conference Room and (1) in the Board Room (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)Audio System2 EA $10,000.00 1 $20,000.00Install Audio system in the Conference Room and Board Room (Owner Furnished, Contractor Installed)TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$62,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$228,195.40 TICKET OFFICEQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements12.0% $10,185.00 1 $1,222.20Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$1,222.20DIVISION 2-EXISTING CONDITIONSSelective Demolition & Salvage 480 SF $3.00 1 $1,440.00Remove existing finishes and prep for installation of new finishes.TOTAL DIVISION 2$1,440.00DIVISION 6 - WOODS, PLASTICS & COMPOSITES Install Salvaged Partition Walls 30 LF $50.00 1$1,500.00Install the salvaged partition walls from the Administration Area on second floorTOTAL DIVISION 6$1,500.00DIVISION 9-FINISHESCarpet Tile54 SY $40.00 1 $2,160.00Install new carpet tileVinyl Base129 SF $5.00 1 $645.00Install new rubber wall baseWall Paint1,290 SF $1.00 1 $1,290.00Repaint the wallsPaint Door Frames1 SF $150.00 1 $150.00Repaint the door framesTOTAL DIVISION 9$4,245.00DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC Mechanical Construction1 LS $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00Tie the HVAC and temperature controls into the new BAS systemTOTAL DIVISION 23$3,000.00SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST$11,407.20Contractor OH&P10%$1,140.72CONTINGENCY15%$1,711.08TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$14,259.00Owner Provided ItemsDIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGSOffice Partition Walls30 LF $215.00 1 $6,450.00Pricing based on 7' tall partition wall (66" solid wall panel + 18" glazed panel on top); by Owner.TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$6,450.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$20,709.00 FACILITY-WIDE IMPROVEMENTSQUANTITY UNITSTOTAL UNIT COSTCORR. FACTOREXTENDED COST DIVISION TOTALNOTESDIVISION 1 - GEN REQUIREMENTSGeneral Requirements12.0% $35,000.00 1 $4,200.00Miscellaneous expenses, office staff, temp facilities, temp utilities, etc. TOTAL DIVISION 1$4,200.00DIVISION 23- HEATING, VENTILATION & AC BAS Headend Equipment1 LS $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00Install new Building Automation System.TOTAL DIVISION 23$5,000.00DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICALFAS Voice Evacuation System (install/labor) 1 LS $25,000.00 1$25,000.00 Install new Fire Alarm System.Fiber Optic Cable1 LS $5,000.00 1$5,000.00 Tie the two facilities' electrical systems together via fiber optic cabling.TOTAL DIVISION 26$30,000.00SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST$39,200.00Contractor OH&P10%$3,920.00Does not include items by Owner, listed below.CONTINGENCY15%$5,880.00Does not include items by Owner, listed below.TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST$49,000.00Owner Provided ItemsDIVISION 26 - ELECTRICALFAS Voice Evacuation System (parts) 1 LS $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00Purchase Fire Alarm System (install by Contractor; see Division 26 above)Security Card Access Sytem1 LS $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00Install new software update for security card access system.Security Camera System1 LS $20,000.00 1 $20,000.00Purchase and install security cameras and system.TOTAL DIVISION 26$47,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS$47,000.00TOTAL ESTIMATED COST$96,000.00 City of Brookings Staff Report Brookings City & County Government Center, 520 Third Street Brookings, SD 57006 (605) 692-6281 phone (605) 692-6907 fax File #:ID 2018-0017,Version:1 National League of Cities Conference & Exposition Report. Summary: Council Members will present a report on the National League of Cities Conference & Exposition, which was held November 15-18, 2017 in Charlotte, NC. City of Brookings Printed on 1/4/2018Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™